Here's the 'Extraordinary' Story of Treasury Nominee Bimal Patel, Ex-O'Melveny Partner
“I am so fortunate that the doctors saved my life and that my parents, particularly my mom, always believed in me,” Patel, up for a key Treasury post, told U.S. senators on Thursday at his confirmation hearing.
February 14, 2019 at 12:55 PM
5 minute read
Born three months premature, weighing two pounds and two ounces, Bimal Patel entered life facing long odds of growing up to tell the U.S. Senate of his improbable journey to being nominated for a top U.S. Treasury Department post.
As he told members of the Senate Banking Committee on Thursday, he contracted pneumonia at two weeks old. “Doctors,” Patel said, “told my parents that I would never grow past four feet tall, that I would be incapacitated, and that I would die.”
Patel is in line for a top supervisory role at the U.S. Treasury Department—assistant secretary for financial institutions. Since May 2017, Patel has served as deputy assistant secretary for the Financial Stability Oversight Council, a panel created under the Dodd-Frank financial reforms charged with promoting market discipline and responding to emerging risks.
“I am so fortunate that the doctors saved my life and that my parents, particularly my mom, always believed in me,” said Patel, a former top financial regulatory partner at O'Melveny & Myers in Washington.
But his story began years before he was born, when his father left a life as a peanut farmer in rural India to pursue an education in the United States. His father, seated behind him at Thursday's hearing, would go on to receive a Ph.D. from New York University and run a number of small businesses in Georgia while teaching at Spelman College, a historically black all-women's college in Atlanta.
Patel's story struck members of the committee, with Sen. Thom Tillis, R-North Carolina, calling it “extraordinary.” But it did not pave an entirely smooth path for Patel during Thursday's confirmation hearing, in which members of the Senate Banking Committee largely focused on Mark Calabria, the Trump's administration's nominee to lead the Federal Housing Finance Agency.
At one point in the hearing, Patel drew raised eyebrows from U.S. Sen. John Kennedy, R-Louisiana, who asked whether there are any banks that are “too big to fail.” Among the Financial Stability Oversight Council's tasks is determining whether institutions are systemically important, or “too-big-to-fail.”
Here's the exchange between Kennedy and Patel:
Kennedy: Do you believe we still have banks that are too big to fail?
Patel: Senator, I believe comparing to pre-crisis levels that financial institutions on the whole are better—
Kennedy: Do you believe that we have banks that are too big to fail?
Patel: I believe in the aggregate that we have greater visibility and resolvability—
Kennedy: Am I missing something here? I'm not connecting with you. Do we still have banks that are too big to fail? Now, you're going to run financial institutions in this country—that's kind of a basic question.
Patel: It is. I think the circumstances surrounding the failure are very fact-dependent.
Kennedy: Well, you're not going to answer the question are you? OK, let me try another one. We did have a financial meltdown in 2008, right?
Patel: We did, yes.
Kennedy: Oh, thank god.
Kennedy: Do you find it embarrassing that many financial institutions that contributed to that meltdown were not held accountable? Not just the institutions—but the people responsible.
Patel: I strongly believe in protecting taxpayers and I hope that we never have to live through another set of events like—
Kennedy: Mr. Patel, I'm not going to vote for you if you don't answer my questions. I don't mean to be rude. But I need answers. We should get you to do your job.
Patel: We should hold accountable those responsible—
Kennedy: And we didn't—did we?
Patel: In some cases we did not.
Kennedy: Right—see that was easy.
Patel: I apologize.
Kennedy: I'm not against big. I'm against dumb. I'm not a big regulation kind of guy. But I'm against not properly regulating our financial markets. The emphasis is properly—and you've got to do that.
Patel: I commit to you, that if I am fortunate enough to be confirmed I will work with you and try to address your concerns.
Read Patel's opening statement below:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrump's SEC Likely to Halt 'Off-Channel' Texting Probe That's Led to Billions in Fines
'Absurd Costs'?: Visa Faces Antitrust Class-Action Surge Following DOJ Complaint
3 minute readNY Antitrust Investigators Seek Subpoena in Probe of Potential Capital One-Discover Merger
Trending Stories
- 1The State of Cost Recovery — Post COVID
- 2Why Is It Becoming More Difficult for Businesses to Mandate Arbitration of Employment Disputes?
- 3The Whys and Hows of a Mediator’s Proposal
- 4Litigators of the Week: A Trade Secret Win at the ITC for Viking Over Promising Potential Liver Drug
- 5Litigator of the Week Runners-Up and Shout-Outs
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250