Here's Who Wants to Sue Trump Over the Border Wall
Several groups said they planned to sue the administration over what they viewed as an illegal power grab.
February 15, 2019 at 05:14 PM
4 minute read
The firestorm over President Donald Trump's declaration of a national emergency to build a wall on the U.S.-Mexico border ignited with a fury Friday, as several groups vowed to sue the administration over what they've decried as an end-run around the Constitution.
Trump announced during a Friday press conference that he would declare a national emergency to begin construction of a wall. Much of the $8 billion dedicated for the project would come from diverting funds appropriated for other purposes, including the Defense Department's military construction projects.
“I didn't need to do this. But I'd rather do it much faster,” Trump said during a press conference Friday. Legal experts have said those remarks would be used in lawsuits to show that Trump's justifications for a national emergency declaration were nonexistent.
By Friday afternoon, several groups emerged claiming they would be a check on the Trump administration. None had yet filed lawsuits, but their arguments broadly were that the executive branch would write off Article I of the Constitution, that Trump has unlawfully redirected appropriated funds away from other federal programs, and that the declaration of an “emergency” was not justified.
“This is a patently illegal power grab that hurts American communities and flouts the checks and balances that are hallmarks of our democracy. We will be filing a lawsuit early next week,” Anthony Romero, executive director of the American Civil Liberties Union, said Friday.
The ACLU said it would argue Trump's use of emergency powers to override Congress' funding restrictions is “unprecedented” and that Trump lacked the statutory authority to use funds Congress dedicated for military construction projects to erect his border wall.
From the West Coast, California Gov. Gavin Newsom promised swift legal action, arguing Trump's plan would divert funds the state's law enforcement used to combat drug cartels “California will see you in court,” he said.
California Attorney General Xavier Becerra, a frequent legal foe of the Trump administration, also tweeted the day before that the state “will do what we must to hold him accountable. No one is above the law.”
Also vowing to join the fray are various states' attorneys general, including New York Attorney General Letitia James, who said Friday her office would use “every legal tool” at its disposal to fight Trump's emergency declaration.
Washington Attorney General Bob Ferguson teased similar legal action: “If Washington is harmed, my office will take appropriate steps to block this unlawful action,” he said Thursday in a press release.
Another group—Protect Democracy—said Thursday that it had prepared a lawsuit on behalf of El Paso County, Texas, and the Border Network for Human Rights, to challenge Trump. The group said it would work alongside the Niskanen Center.
Trump said his administration would likely lose any legal challenge to his declaration at the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. He said the case would then make its way to the Supreme Court, where “hopefully we'll get a fair shake and we'll win.”
Trump has been a frequent critic of the Ninth Circuit, which has frequently ruled against his policies. Trump did notch a victory at the Ninth Circuit over border wall construction earlier this week.
Looming over the president's declaration is the possibility of a court battle with the Democratic-controlled U.S. House of Representatives. Speaker Nancy Pelosi and Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, in a joint statement, described Trump's move as an end-run around the Constitution and a violation of “Congress's exclusive power of the purse.”
“The Congress will defend our constitutional authorities in the Congress, in the Courts, and in the public, using every remedy available,” they said.
Read more:
Donald Trump's Now 1-0 in Border Wall Cases in the Ninth Circuit
Sen. Whitehouse: There's a 'Crisis of Credibility' at the U.S. Supreme Court
Trump Portrays Supreme Court as Key Player in DACA, Border Wall Fights
Chief Justice Roberts Rebuffs Trump After He Criticizes Judges Again
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllUS Judge Cannon Blocks DOJ From Releasing Final Report in Trump Documents Probe
3 minute readPrivate Equity Giant KKR Refiles SDNY Countersuit in DOJ Premerger Filing Row
3 minute readSeveral Big Law Firms Saw Year-Over-Year Lobbying Revenue Growth in 2024
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Courts Demonstrate Growing Willingness to Sanction Courtroom Misuse of AI
- 2The New Rules of AI: Part 1—Managing Risk
- 3Change Is Coming to the EEOC—But Not Overnight
- 4Med Mal Defense Win Stands as State Appeals Court Rejects Arguments Over Blocked Cross-Examination
- 5Rejecting 'Blind Adherence to Outdated Precedent,’ US Judge Goes His Own Way on Attorney Fees
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250