Meet the Judge: What to Know About Amy Berman Jackson
Roger Stone must explain why his conditions for release and a media contact order placed on him shouldn't be revoked or changed in light of a photo he posted on Instagram that featured Jackson with a crosshair next to her head.
February 20, 2019 at 12:09 PM
4 minute read
Judge Amy Berman Jackson must once again decide whether to revoke the conditions of release for a defendant tied to the special counsel's Russia investigation.
First, it was Paul Manafort. The former Trump campaign chairman found himself behind bars this past summer after he was arraigned on new charges accusing him of attempting to tamper with potential witnesses. The revocation of Manafort's bond came after Jackson, of the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, already put him on notice in November 2017 over ghostwriting an op-ed for the Ukrainian English newspaper Kyiv Post.
Jackson struck a tone of regret when sending Manafort to jail, saying she thought “long and hard” about the decision. Ultimately, Jackson said she was “troubled” by Manafort's attempts to contact potential witnesses by phone and encrypted messaging.
Now, it's Roger Stone who must explain why his conditions for release and a media contact order placed on him shouldn't be revoked or changed in light of a photo he posted on Instagram that featured Jackson with a crosshair next to her head. The post was taken down, but not before it caught significant social media attention.
Stone's legal team filed an apology with the court, but it was not enough to head off Thursday's hearing before Jackson.
The post came just days after Stone's legal team asked for a new judge. Stone's lawyers questioned the fairness of assigning the case to Jackson instead of randomly assigning it to a judge under local criminal rules. Randomly assigning a judge is an essential element of due process to ensure a fair trial, Stone's lawyers said in their request for a new judge.
Jackson has been handling many of the cases brought by special counsel Robert Mueller III's team as it investigates Russian interference into the 2016 presidential election.
Stone is fighting charges that he lied to congressional investigators probing Russian interference in the 2016 U.S. election, obstructed justice and tampered with a witness. Those charges were brought by prosecutors working for Mueller and the U.S. attorney in Washington, D.C., Jessie Liu. Their offices are jointly handling Stone's case.
Stone is represented by Fort Lauderdale, Florida-based attorneys Bruce Rogow, Grant Smith of StrategySmith, and Robert Buschel of Buschel & Gibbons. He also has a Washington, D.C.-based attorney, L. Peter Farkas of Halloran Farkas + Kittila.
Jackson is no stranger to the spotlight. She's presided over high-profile cases, including a class action over the Office of Personnel Management's data breach and the Justice Department's blockbuster challenge to Anthem Inc.'s proposed $54 billion acquisition of Cigna Corp.
She also oversaw the 2012 lawsuit for documents tied to the botched gun sting known as “Operation Fast and Furious.” Jackson ruled against the Obama administration at one point in that case, saying it could not claim executive privilege to withhold some of the documents.
Jackson, a former Trout Cacheris litigation partner in Washington, was confirmed in 2011. She graduated in 1979 from Harvard Law School, where one of her classmates included Chief Justice John Roberts. She also served as a law clerk to Judge Harrison Winter of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, and as an assistant U.S. attorney for the District of Columbia before going into private practice.
Read more:
Roger Stone's Apology for 'Crosshairs' Instagram Post Wasn't Enough for Judge
Roger Stone's Lawyers Already Want a New Judge in Mueller Case
Mueller: Manafort Should Face 19-24 Years on Bank, Tax Fraud Charges
Don't Assume Anything From Your Sentencing Judge, and Other Takeaways: Flynn Edition
Amy Berman Jackson, Judge Assigned to Manafort Case, No Stranger to Spotlight
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllGovernment Attorneys Face Reassignment, Rescinded Job Offers in First Days of Trump Administration
4 minute readRFK Jr. Will Keep Affiliations With Morgan & Morgan, Other Law Firms If Confirmed to DHHS
3 minute readAm Law 200 Firms Announce Wave of D.C. Hires in White-Collar, Antitrust, Litigation Practices
3 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250