Meet the Judge Who'll Decide California's Challenge to Trump's National Emergency Declaration at the Border
U.S. District Judge Haywood Gilliam Jr., who on Wednesday was assigned the case brought by Democratic state attorneys general, has previously blocked the implementation of Trump administration rules creating exemptions to the contraceptive mandate in the Affordable Care Act.
February 20, 2019 at 03:17 PM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on The Recorder
Lawyers for the Trump administration are likely to be in a familiar Oakland, California, courtroom as they seek to defend the president's declaration of a national emergency at the nation's southern border with Mexico.
U.S. District Judge Haywood Gilliam Jr. of the Northern District of California on Wednesday was assigned a lawsuit brought by a group of Democratic states' attorneys general who claim that the declaration will divert funding from the states to finance a wall along the U.S.-Mexico border, a signature proposal of Donald Trump's 2016 presidential campaign.
Administration lawyers will have to hope for better luck than they've had so far in litigating a separate case that's before Gilliam where state attorneys general have challenged the president's policies. Gilliam last month granted the AGs' request for a preliminary injunction blocking the implementation of Trump administration rule changes that would have created exemptions to the contraceptive mandate in the Affordable Care Act. Gilliam had previously granted a nationwide temporary restraining order in the case in late 2017. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, however, last narrowed the ruling's impact to the plaintiff states in a ruling that cautioned district judges against issuing nationwide injunctions.
The Executive Committee of the Northern District of California assigned Gilliam the border wall funding case after lawyers for the states declined magistrate judge jurisdiction in the case. As of Wednesday, lawyers for the Trump administration had yet to make an appearance in the case.
Gilliam, a former federal prosecutor, took the bench in 2014 after a stint as the vice chairman of the white-collar defense and investigation group at Covington & Burling. He got his undergraduate degree at Yale University and clerked for U.S. District Judge Thelton Henderson after graduating from Stanford Law School in 1994. From 1996 to 1999 he was an associate at the firm then known as McCutchen, Doyle, Brown & Enersen. After nearly eight years as an assistant U.S. attorney in the Northern District of California, Gilliam returned to the McCutchen firm as a partner before joining Covington in 2009.
Gilliam is the most recently confirmed of the 11 judges appointed by President Barack Obama who occupy all but three of the active district judge slots in Northern California. So far, there have been no district court openings on the Northern District bench for Trump to fill. U.S. District Judge Trevor McFadden of the District of Columbia, a Trump appointee, has been assigned a separate challenge brought on behalf of people who own property along the border.
In announcing that he would declare a national emergency at the southern border in the White House Rose Garden Friday, Trump predicted to reporters that the administration would be sued.
“And they will sue us in the Ninth Circuit, even though it shouldn't be there,” Trump said. “And we will possibly get a bad ruling, and then we'll get another bad ruling. And then we'll end up in the Supreme Court, and hopefully we'll get a fair shake. And we'll win in the Supreme Court, just like the [travel] ban.”
Trump's remarks echoed his earlier criticism from last year of the Ninth Circuit and an “Obama judge” who ruled against him in a case challenging the administration's changes to asylum policy. The earlier remarks prompted a rare response from Chief Justice John Roberts.
“We do not have Obama judges or Trump judges, Bush judges or Clinton judges,” Roberts said in a statement issued by the court. “What we have is an extraordinary group of dedicated judges doing their level best to do equal right to those appearing before them. That independent judiciary is something we should all be thankful for.”
Read more:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllWilmer, Miles & Stockbridge, and Polsinelli Hire Litigation, Government Contract Attorneys
2 minute read'Sharp and Profound' Policy Shifts Prompt DC Law Firms to Evaluate Opportunities, Challenges
5 minute readTrump Election-Interference Prosecution Appears on Course to Wind Down
4 minute read'Rapidly Closing Window': Progressive Groups Urge Senate Votes on Biden's Judicial Nominees
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Gordon Rees Opens 80th Office, ‘Collaboration Hub’ in Palo Alto
- 2The White Stripes Drop Copyright Claim Against Trump Campaign
- 3Law Firm Accused of Barratry for Allegedly Soliciting Crash Victims
- 4Carlton Fields Downsizes in Move to New Atlanta Office
- 5Trump's Selection of Zeldin to Head EPA Draws Surprise, Little Hope of Avoiding Deregulation
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250