Florida Bar Is Investigating US Rep. Matt Gaetz After Complaints of Alleged Cohen Witness Tampering
A Twitter campaign called on users to lodge complaints with the Florida Bar after Gaetz seemingly threatened President Donald Trump's former attorney Michael Cohen a day before his testimony before Congress.
February 27, 2019 at 02:51 PM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Daily Business Review
The Florida Bar has opened an ethics investigation of U.S. Rep. Matt Gaetz, a Fort Walton Beach attorney, based on a tweet targeting ex-Trump attorney Michael Cohen and seen by some as witness tampering.
Although the bar would not confirm the nature of the complaints, Gaetz fired off the controversial tweet Tuesday, prompting widespread condemnation and spawning a copy-and-paste Twitter campaign. The Twitter posters called on other users to file a complaint with the Florida Bar in order to have Gaetz disbarred for witness tampering.
“The Florida Bar is aware of the comments made in a tweet yesterday by Rep. Matt Gaetz, who is a Florida Bar member, and I can confirm we have opened an investigation,” said Florida Bar spokeswoman Francine Walker.
In Gaetz's tweet, which he sent the day before Cohen was set to testify before Congress, Gaetz wrote:
Hey @MichaelCohen212 – Do your wife & father-in-law know about your girlfriends? Maybe tonight would be a good time for that chat. I wonder if she'll remain faithful while you're in prison. She's about to learn a lot…”
Gaetz apologized to Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi and deleted the tweet hours after he posted it. His office did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
Yesterday, Twitter users began posting nearly identical tweets alleging that Gaetz's tweet to Cohen violated a federal statute regarding witness intimidation. The North Florida politician had been an attorney at Keefe, Anchors, Gordon & Moyle, according to the Florida Bar's website, though the firm no longer has a website or public contact information. While there are small differences in the hundreds of tweets, the most common language is:
“Matt Gaetz is a licensed attorney in Florida. His Bar Number is 48962. He violated 18 U.S.C. § 1512. He could be charged with a felony for witness tampering but this is also grounds for disbarment. Call the Florida Bar and file an official complaint. The number is 1-866-352-0707.”
According to botcheck.me, an application that uses machine learning to identify fraudulent accounts on Twitter, most, if not all, of the tweets are from human-run accounts.
Levine Kellogg Lehman Schneider + Grossman attorney Larry Kellogg, who previously sat on the Florida Bar's grievance committee, said that though the bar often takes social media and news reports into consideration when deciding whether an attorney has violated criminal law or personal conduct statutes, Gaetz's status as a politician would likely protect him from discipline.
“Unless he's convicted of a crime, he's not going to be disbarred,” said Kellogg, who pointed out that Cohen was only disbarred Tuesday following his multiple guilty pleas to federal charges.
Kellogg said that the Florida Bar has long had internal discussions over how involved in politics it should get, and what constitutes “taking a political side.” Given the high-profile nature of the subject, Kellogg believes the bar will refrain from wading into the political dust-up, especially if most of the bar complaints come as a result of tweets with identical language.
Regardless, Gaetz will likely be required to respond to the bar complaints, an annoyance if anything, Kellogg said. The grievance committee may send Gaetz some correspondence asking him to refrain from future similar tweets.
“He might get a letter saying 'I know you're a Congressman but you have to tone it down,' ” Kellogg said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Serious Disruptions'?: Federal Courts Brace for Government Shutdown Threat
3 minute readGovernment Attorneys Are Flooding the Job Market, But Is There Room in Big Law?
4 minute readWill Khan Resign? FTC Chair Isn't Saying Whether She'll Stick Around After Giving Up Gavel
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250