Takeaways From Wynn Resorts' $20M Penalty Over Sexual Misconduct Claims
"There was a repeated failure to investigate and follow and enforce the policies concerning workplace harassment," one observer says.
February 28, 2019 at 04:49 PM
5 minute read
The $20 million regulatory fine against Wynn Resorts tied to a sexual harassment scandal that ousted chairman and CEO Steve Wynn last year was the largest Nevada has imposed against a gambling licensee and marked a rare instance in the #MeToo era of a company being held accountable for not doing enough to investigate and stop workplace misconduct.
Companies across industries have been forced ever more to face consequences of alleged sexual misconduct claims against executives, as the #MeToo movement put a new spotlight on harassment in the workplace. The introspection has driven law firm investigations and preventative work, and in some cases big settlements involving claims against high-level executives.
But, so far at least, regulatory fines have been uncommon, employment attorneys said in interviews with The National Law Journal. The penalty this week issued by the Nevada Gaming Commission exposed the consequences a company can face by allegedly failing to timely investigate complaints of sexual harassment.
➤➤ Get employment law news and commentary straight to your inbox with Labor of Law, a new Law.com briefing. Learn more and sign up here.
The penalty against Wynn Resorts showed that a company—beyond an executive—can be held accountable for how it responds to sexual harassment complaints, said Deborah Marcuse, the Title VII practice group co-chairwoman at plaintiffs firm Sanford Heisler Sharp. Ignoring complaints, or not doing enough to investigate them, can be a liability.
Wynn Resorts said in a statement that there's been a “paradigm shift” at the company over the past year. The Wall Street Journal last year published investigative reports about Wynn, who resigned amid allegations of sexual harassment. He has denied any wrongdoing.
“The completion of the review by Nevada regulators is an important step forward, and we deeply appreciate the trust and confidence they have placed in the new leadership of Wynn Resorts to 'grow and prosper,'” the company said.
Gregory Brower, a Brownstein Hyatt Farber Schreck partner who represented Wynn Resorts, was not reached for comment.
The Nevada Gaming Commission said in its settlement with Wynn Resorts that company leaders “fell short of their culture and commitment in perhaps one of the most important areas for an employer—focusing on its employees. Respondents have focused on a single man, rather than the company's greatest asset, its 25,000 employees.”
Wynn Resorts initiated an “enhanced” workplace compliance and sexual harassment training program for all employees, and the company commissioned pay and promotion equity studies, the commission said. The company has taken measures to “reinvigorate and implement meaningful change across all levels of the organization.”
Marcuse called the Wynn Resorts case a “stark example” that features a more regular occurrence in which companies don't adequately investigate misconduct claims.
“When you choose to ignore a cultural problem at your corporation, you're making a bad business decision that could come back and bite you,” she said. “This is dramatically worse than a single case would be.”
Cheryl Sabnis, a litigation partner at King & Spalding in San Francisco, said the Wynn Resorts penalty showed the far-reaching consequences of allegations of sexual harassment.
“The issue was not just sexual assault happened, but there was a repeated failure to investigate and follow and enforce the policies concerning workplace harassment,” Sabnis said. “The key takeaway is a reminder that when allegations are made you have to investigate them, you can't ignore them. If you do so, you do it at your own peril.” She added: “If you don't live by those policies you are setting yourself up for failure.”
Sabnis said the Wynn Resorts penalty was specific to the Nevada commission but shows that companies will continue to face pressure to take seriously workplace culture and take steps to minimize and prevent misconduct.
“It's one more avenue where a company has played fast and loose and ignored allegations and not properly handled those allegations in the past,” she said. “It's not just litigation. It's not just a social media onslaught. It's not just bad press. It shouldn't be looked at as a one-off. It should be looked at in a new area where regulators are holding the bar appropriately.”
The Wynn Resorts settlement is posted below:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllBaltimore City Govt., After Winning Opioid Jury Trial, Preparing to Demand an Additional $11B for Abatement Costs
3 minute readRegulatory Upheaval Is Coming. How Businesses Prepare and Respond Will Separate Winners and Losers
3 GOP States Join Paid Sick Leave Movement, Passing Ballot Measures by Wide Margins
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Will Trump Be a Boost to Quinn Emanuel's Fortunes in China?
- 2Legaltech Rundown: LexisNexis Releases Lexis+ AI Mobile App, Hotshot Launches New M&A Training Simulation, and More
- 3Perkins Coie Boasts Diverse Partner Class
- 4READ THE DOC: NY Judge Indefinitely Delays Sentencing in Trump Hush Money Case
- 5US Supreme Court Tries to Define a 'Crime of Violence'
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250