'Urgent,' 'Problematic': Roger Stone's Attorneys Scrambled After Gag Order Scolding
Email exchanges included in court papers filed Monday evening detail the frenzied effort by Stone's attorneys to get information from publishers on when the book, with a new intro critical of the special counsel, was sent to stores.
March 12, 2019 at 08:35 AM
4 minute read
Roger Stone's attorneys were left scrambling in the days after they decided the new “problematic” introduction for the former Trump adviser's book could land him in jail for potentially violating his gag order.
Stone has been in legal hot water since his attorneys notified Judge Amy Berman Jackson of the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia that their client would be re-releasing his 2017 book. The release includes a new introduction that criticizes special counsel Robert Mueller III, who brought the criminal charges against Stone.
Email exchanges included in court papers filed Monday night detail the frenzied effort by Stone's attorneys to get information from publishers on when the book was sent to stores, when it would be publicly released, and how it fit into the broader picture of when Jackson issued an order prohibiting their client from speaking publicly about his case.
“The mere publication of the new portions of the book could land Roger in jail for contempt of the judge's order. We are trying to establish data points and provide legal advice,” Grant Smith, one of Stone's attorneys, told a publisher in a Feb. 26 email. “I can not give you more information without violating the attorney client relationship at the moment.”
“I need this immediately. This is not a some made up emergency,” Smith wrote.
In an earlier Feb. 21 email exchange among members of Stone's legal team, one of his attorneys Bruce Rogow deemed a potion of the book's new introduction “problematic,” and floated the idea of asking the publisher to black out the pages.
Stone is represented by Fort Lauderdale-based attorneys Grant Smith of StrategySmith; Robert Buschel of Buschel & Gibbons; and Bruce Rogow and Tara Campion. He's also retained a Washington, D.C.-based attorney, L. Peter Farkas of Halloran Farkas + Kittila.
The emails, revealing how Stone's book sent his attorneys into a mad dash, are included in a court submission that Stone's attorneys filed late Monday after Jackson ordered them last week to detail Stone's efforts to comply with a gag order she issued on Feb. 21.
Stone's lawyers notified the Washington, D.C., judge earlier this month about the “imminent” re-release of Stone's book and the new introduction, which calls special counsel Robert Mueller III “crooked.” Stone's attorneys asked the court to “clarify” that the book's re-release did not violate the order, because the introduction was written before the order was issued.
Jackson last week denied that motion, instead scolding Stone and his legal team for not immediately notifying the court about the book. Noting that the book was already on sale and that the introduction was already accessible online, Jackson ordered Stone's attorneys to explain the discrepancy and to produce records related to the book's re-release.
In their Monday evening filing, Stone's attorneys apologized for the “confusing representation about publication.” They clarified that the new introduction for Stone's book was sent to publishers in January and scheduled for a February release.
They told the Jackson they did not intend to mislead her by not flagging the book earlier. They said they only read the revised introduction after Stone's gag order hearing took place—specifically, while they were waiting to catch a plane back to Florida.
Stone earlier got into trouble with the court after he posted a photo on Instagram appearing to show Jackson's head next to what appeared to be a gun's crosshair. That resulted in Jackson issuing the gag order that barred Stone from publicly discussing the case.
A status conference is scheduled for March 14.
Stone has pleaded not guilty to charges that he lied to congressional investigators probing Russian interference in the 2016 U.S. election, obstructed justice and tampered with a witness.
Read more:
Judge Scolds Roger Stone's Defense Team Over 'Unexplained Inconsistencies'
Roger Stone Is Bench Slapped, Gagged Over Hostile Instagram Post
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllBankruptcy Judge Clears Path for Recovery in High-Profile Crypto Failure
3 minute readGovernment Attorneys Face Reassignment, Rescinded Job Offers in First Days of Trump Administration
4 minute readDC Judge Chutkan Allows Jenner's $8M Unpaid Legal Fees Lawsuit to Proceed Against Sierra Leone
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1We the People?
- 2New York-Based Skadden Team Joins White & Case Group in Mexico City for Citigroup Demerger
- 3No Two Wildfires Alike: Lawyers Take Different Legal Strategies in California
- 4Poop-Themed Dog Toy OK as Parody, but Still Tarnished Jack Daniel’s Brand, Court Says
- 5Meet the New President of NY's Association of Trial Court Jurists
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250