Russian Billionaire Deripaska Sues Mnuchin Over 'Devastating' Sanctions
Oleg Deripaska claims the U.S. Treasury's block on his property and assets have contributed to the devastation of his wealth and reputation.
March 15, 2019 at 01:43 PM
5 minute read
Russian billionaire Oleg Deripaska, long facing scrutiny over his ties to President Vladimir Putin, on Friday sued the U.S. government to reverse “devastating” sanctions that he claimed have destroyed his reputation and cut him off from international business.
Deripaska, represented by Washington lawyer Erich Ferrari, who specializes in U.S. government sanctions disputes, claimed U.S. Treasury's block on his property and assets have contributed to the “wholesale devastation of [his] wealth, reputation, and economic livelihood.” Deripaska's suit claimed he has lost $7.5 billion since the Treasury first imposed sanctions in April 2018.
“By sanctioning Deripaska and including him in an arbitrarily contrived list of 'oligarchs,' defendants have acted without regard to these obligations and beyond the bounds of their authority,” according to Deripaska's lawsuit, which was brought against the Treasury Department and its Office of Foreign Assets Control.
The Treasury Department declined to comment on the lawsuit, filed in U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia.
Deripaska, according to his complaint, “has been ousted from the international business community, as banks and businesses refuse to transact or deal with him or his businesses out of fear of their own potential exposure to U.S. sanctions for doing so.”
The suit comes amid broadening congressional scrutiny of how the Trump administration has handled sanctions against Russian businesses and executives. The administration has sanctioned more than 200 Russian-related entities and individuals, but the decision to lift sanctions against three Deripaska-owned companies drew criticism and questions from members of Congress.
Indeed, members of Congress questioned the Treasury Department's moves to lift sanctions against companies Deripaska controls, including Rusal, one of the world's largest aluminum producers. Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin participated recently in a bipartisan classified briefing with U.S. House members.
Mnuchin said in a statement in January that “Deripaska will remain sanctioned, his property and interests remain blocked, and any companies he controls are also sanctioned.”
On lifting sanctions against three companies under Deripaska's control, Mnuchin said: “These entities are undergoing significant restructuring and governance changes that sever Deripaska's control and significantly diminish his ownership. They have committed to provide Treasury with an unprecedented level of transparency into their dealings to ensure that Deripaska does not reassert control.”
Deripaska has repeatedly denied any involvement in alleged Russian collusion that is the focus of Special Counsel Robert Mueller III's ongoing investigation. Former Trump campaign chairman Paul Manafort, convicted in Washington and Virginia courts on lobbying and financial crimes, has reportedly long known Deripaska. Ferrari, Deripaska's lawyer, said in Friday's complaint “it appears to be the case that there is simply no evidence Deripaska is involved in the Russian government's activities.”
Friday's lawsuit claimed the political climate in the United States precludes the ability of Deripaska from challenging his blacklist designation through an administrative process at the Office of Foreign Assets Control.
“Members of Congress—potential stakeholders in any future delisting—have also exhibited their own animus towards Deripaska by expressly referring to him as an 'enemy' and a 'criminal,' absent any evidence and without consequence to their political standing,” according to the lawsuit. “Indeed, the general hysteria surrounding Deripaska prevents him from having a meaningful opportunity to challenge his designations through the normal channels for doing so.”
Ferrari is no stranger to suing the Treasury Department over its sanctions. In July 2017, he represented a Belizean banana farmer who challenged sanctions imposed for his alleged ties to Mexican drug lord Joaquín “El Chapo” Guzmán. Those sanctions were lifted the following month, according to the Federal Register.
Here's the complaint Deripaska filed Friday in Washington:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllRead the Document: 'Google Must Divest Chrome,' DOJ Says, Proposing Remedies in Search Monopoly Case
3 minute readAmir Ali, MacArthur Justice Center Director, Confirmed to DC District Court
From ‘Deep Sadness’ to Little Concern, Gaetz’s Nomination Draws Sharp Reaction From Lawyers
7 minute readConservative Boutiques That Backed Trump Reap Their Rewards
Trending Stories
- 1First California Zantac Jury Ends in Mistrial
- 2Democrats Give Up Circuit Court Picks for Trial Judges in Reported Deal with GOP
- 3Trump Taps Former Fla. Attorney General for AG
- 4Newsom Names Two Judges to Appellate Courts in San Francisco, Orange County
- 5Biden Has Few Ways to Protect His Environmental Legacy, Say Lawyers, Advocates
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250