In Trump vs. George Conway, Will Wachtell Be Caught in the Crossfire?
President Donald Trump on Wednesday called Wachtell's Conway "a stone cold LOSER" and "husband from hell!" Conway's response? A retweet with the comment, "The President of the United States."
March 20, 2019 at 05:00 PM
5 minute read
The original version of this story was published on The American Lawyer
George Conway, the 30-year veteran of Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz and 18-year spouse of counselor to President Donald Trump Kellyanne Conway, first used Twitter to express his opinions about the president back in June 2017.
Lately Conway, who's formally of counsel at the ultra-elite New York firm, has accelerated his online criticism of the president. He's become a co-founder of a group of conservative lawyers vowing to speak out in favor of the rule of law and to the power of truth, a clear rebuke to the president.
Now Trump, who's never shied away from an online fight, is dishing back with new tweets and insults that continued into Wednesday.
Trump used Twitter Tuesday to call Conway a “total loser” after 2020 campaign manager Brad Parscale wrote that the president ”turned down Mr. Kellyanne Conway for a job he desperately wanted.” Conway had once been mooted to serve as Trump's solicitor general then refused an offer to lead the civil division of the U.S. Department of Justice.
On Wednesday, Trump attacked Conway again on Twitter, this time without a prompt from Parscale.
“George Conway, often referred to as Mr. Kellyanne Conway by those who know him, is VERY jealous of his wife's success & angry that I, with her help, didn't give him the job he so desperately wanted. I barely know him but just take a look, a stone cold LOSER & husband from hell!”
According to a report from NBC News, Trump continued his fusillade when speaking to reporters on the White House lawn Wednesday afternoon before leaving for Ohio, calling Conway a “whack job.”
Conway, meanwhile, responded to Tuesday's affront by asserting the president has a narcissistic personality disorder. His rejoinder to Wednesday's tweet was more succinct: he simply retweeted it, commenting “The President of the United States.”
While internet and media speculation in recent days and months has centered on the status of the Conways' marriage, there's another consequence of the feud worth considering: any potential impact on Wachtell, the most profitable law firm in the world.
In addition to airing his grievances with individuals ranging from the late Sen. John McCain to North Korean leader Kim Jong-Un, Trump has eagerly used Twitter as a mouthpiece to attack companies that have provoked his ire. Targets have included Amazon, General Motors, the New York Times, and Carrier, and Trump shows no signs of running out of room on his list.
So what happens if Trump elects to call out not just Conway, but also his employer, Wachtell?
“It's an area that's fraught with danger,” says Stan Steinreich, president and CEO of Steinreich Communications. “The president is still the president, and that only comes with gravitas and power.”
(Another lawyer at an elite New York firm, Sullivan & Cromwell partner Frank Aquila, deleted his own Twitter account in September after tweeting that White House Press Secretary Sarah Sanders should “Rot in Hell” and having his position with the law firm draw scrutiny.)
Compared to some of its peers, Wachtell doesn't regularly see its attorneys jump back and forth between the firm and the corridors of power in Washington, D.C., and elsewhere. (Two exceptions: former New York district attorney Robert Morgenthau and former White House counsel Bernard Nussbaum.) Consequently, it may not be as familiar with seeing its attorneys landing at the center of the news cycle as other top New York and Washington firms.
Still, it's likely that the firm has already considered the prospect of being hit with shrapnel from the fight.
“This isn't their first rodeo,” Steinreich says. “I would certainly assume they're well prepared to handle that.”
It's also fair to expect that the firm, already muted in its public profile, has made a pre-emptive decision to sit on its hands if its name does show up in the president's Twitter postings. Neither Conway nor the firm responded to requests for comment, but that would be in line with Steinreich's advice.
“When things spiral down into the gutter, I think people that take the high ground and don't engage in the mudslinging are those that ultimately win out,” he says. “I would counsel Wachtell not to be quick to jump into this mix. Situations like this can be 24-hour events at best.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrump's SEC Overhaul: What It Means for Big Law Capital Markets, Crypto Work
Holland & Knight, Akin, Crowell, Barnes and Day Pitney Add to DC Practices
3 minute readFrom ‘Deep Sadness’ to Little Concern, Gaetz’s Nomination Draws Sharp Reaction From Lawyers
7 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250