US House Committee Passes First-Ever Marijuana Banking Bill
The bill, approved by the House Committee on Financial Services, is a top priority for a marijuana industry largely shut out of mainstream banking.
March 28, 2019 at 11:54 AM
4 minute read
U.S. House Democrats on Thursday advanced legislation to give cannabis businesses greater access to banking, approving protections for financial institutions for the first time in six years of legislative attempts.
The Secure and Fair Enforcement Banking Act would offer legal safe harbor for banks and credit unions that choose to serve state-approved marijuana-related businesses if they comply with a set of reporting requirements.
The bill, approved by the House Committee on Financial Services in a 45-15 vote, is a top priority for a marijuana industry largely shut out of mainstream banking and forced to deal in large sums of cash.
"What we've done is draft a piece of legislation that is narrowly confined to the financial services industry so that … businesses that are legitimate in their states can get legitimate banking services—credit cards, payroll, checking accounts, lending," said Rep. Ed Perlmutter, D-Colorado, one of the bill's lead authors. "Because we've seen that across the country, huge piles of cash are developed by these businesses and particularly create real public safety hazards."
Democratic control of the House has provided a friendlier environment for marijuana bills such as the Secure and Fair Enforcement Banking Act, which in previous congresses had been bottled up by the key Republican chairman.
➤➤ Get the latest cannabis lawyering, compliance and commentary straight to your inbox with Higher Law, a new Law.com briefing. Learn more and sign up here.
California Democrat Maxine Waters now chairs the Financial Services Committee and has expressed support for measures to protect state-regulated marijuana. At Waters' request, Perlmutter added language to his bill Wednesday to require banking regulators to report annually on the availability of banking services to minority- and women-owned cannabis businesses.
"I also consider this bill as part of a holistic approach toward providing criminal justice reform to those who have been harmed by criminalization of marijuana and should not by any means be the only bill the House takes up on the important issue of cannabis reform," Waters said.
Perlmutter said he had 151 co-sponsors for his legislation, including some Republicans. Many Republicans on the Financial Services Committee, however, opposed the bill and tried unsuccessfully during Wednesday's marathon markup session to attach hostile amendments.
"We need to ensure that we're doing our due diligence before proceeding," said North Carolina Rep. Patrick McHenry, the ranking Republican member of the committee. "One committee hearing is not enough to fully understand the consequences of this bill. It is a massive change in federal policy."
At the end of 2018, 551 banks and credit unions across the country reported serving marijuana-related businesses, according to the U.S. Department of the Treasury's Financial Crimes Enforcement Network.
"The SAFE Banking Act would go a long way toward improving safety, transparency, access, and justice in the cannabis industry," said Aaron Smith, executive director of the National Cannabis Industry Association. "The amendments agreed upon in committee should solidify the already overwhelming support for this legislation in the House. The cannabis and financial services industries have been waiting for clarification and protection for far too long, and we are confident the House would approve this bill if allowed to vote on it without further delay."
Read more:
Hogan Lovells Joins Ninth Circuit Fight Over Seized Hemp
The IRS Keeps Winning Marijuana Cases in US Appeals Courts
Catch Up With a Paul Hastings Lobbyist on Crypto, Cannabis & More
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'A Warning Shot to Board Rooms': DOJ Decision to Fight $14B Tech Merger May Be Bad Omen for Industry
'Incredibly Complicated'? Antitrust Litigators Identify Pros and Cons of Proposed One Agency Act
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1'Lookback Window' Law for Child Abuse Cases Constitutional, State High Court Finds
- 2Troutman Pepper Says Ex-Associate Who Alleged Racial Discrimination Lost Job Because of Failure to Improve
- 3Texas Bankruptcy Judge Withdraws Ethics Complaint Against Jackson Walker
- 4Apply Now: Superior Court Judge Sought for Mountain Judicial Circuit Bench
- 5Harrisburg Jury Hands Up $1.5M Verdict to Teen Struck by Underinsured Driver
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250