Alex Jones addresses the media inside the Rayburn House Office Building ahead of a House Judiciary Committee hearing with testimony from Google CEO Sundar Pichai on Dec. 11, 2018. Photo: Diego M. Radzinschi/ALMBad News for Alex Jones: Defamation Case Over Charlottesville Theories Gets Green Light
A team from Georgetown Law's Civil Rights Clinic represents the plaintiff.
March 29, 2019 at 12:01 PM
3 minute read
Legal troubles mounted Friday for conspiracy theorist and Infowars host Alex Jones after a federal judge in Virginia ruled a defamation lawsuit can proceed against him and other defendants over the Charlottesville rallies that led to the death of protester Heather Heyer.
Jones is a co-defendant, along with his media company Infowars LLC and others, including former Florida Rep. Allen West, in a suit filed by plaintiff Brennan M. Gilmore, whose video of Heyer's death went viral.
Gilmore recorded and posted a video of James Alex Fields Jr. plowing his car into a crowd protesting the “Unite the Right” rally in Virginia, which had attracted white supremacist and neo-Nazi groups. Fields later pleaded guilty to 29 federal hate crimes for the August 2017 attack that killed Heyer, a paralegal with The Miller Law Group, and injured 36 others.
But Gilmore alleges Jones and the other defendants led an online campaign accusing him of being a “deep state” operative who helped orchestrate and spread propaganda about the incident. He filed a federal lawsuit suit in the Western District of Virginia alleging defamation and intentional infliction of emotional distress.
The defendants moved to dismiss, arguing that the Virginia court lacked subject-matter jurisdiction and could not exercise personal jurisdiction over them.
Senior U.S. District Judge Norman K. Moon disagreed. He found the court could exercise personal jurisdiction over all the defendants, except for West. Moon dismissed West because Gilmore failed to prove he had a hand in distributing an article targeting a Virginia audience.
Andrew Mendrala, Aderson Francois, Brianne Gorod and Elizabeth Wydra of Georgetown Law's Civil Rights Clinic represented Gilmore.
“Victims of vile conspiracy theories should take comfort in Judge Moon's ruling that Brennan Gilmore's defamation suit against InfoWars must proceed,” supervising attorney Mendrala said in a statement Friday. “Today's decision shows that the law will protect victims of baseless lies by holding people like Alex Jones accountable for the harm they cause.”
Defense counsel included Thomas Albro and Evan Mayo of Tremblay & Smith; and Baker & Hostetler attorneys Andrew Grossman, Elizabeth Scully, Richard Raile and Mark Bailen. Bailen's automated email message indicated he was out of office Friday, while the other attorneys did not immediately respond to a request for comment by deadline.
|This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All
Baltimore City Govt., After Winning Opioid Jury Trial, Preparing to Demand an Additional $11B for Abatement Costs
3 minute read
Regulatory Upheaval Is Coming. How Businesses Prepare and Respond Will Separate Winners and Losers
3 GOP States Join Paid Sick Leave Movement, Passing Ballot Measures by Wide Margins
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250
