Senior US House Lawyer Will Depart Doug Letter's General Counsel Office
The House General Counsel's Office will play a central role in any subpoena fights involving the Trump administration. Last month, Letter hired Megan Barbero, a senior appellate lawyer at the Justice Department, as an associate general counsel.
April 02, 2019 at 04:45 PM
4 minute read
Updated at 7 p.m.
A senior lawyer in the U.S. House of Representatives general counsel's office is leaving the legislative chamber's legal team as the Democratic majority ramps up investigations into President Donald Trump and his administration, setting the stage for court battles over document demands.
The lawyer, Kimberly Hamm, notified judges in pending cases that she is stepping down from her role as associate general counsel. A former litigation counsel at the law firm Simpson Thacher & Bartlett, Hamm joined the House general counsel's office in October 2014 and was promoted last year, under the leadership of then-general counsel Thomas Hungar, to the third-ranking role in the office.
Hamm's departure comes just months after the Democrats returned to power in the House and Douglas Letter, a former top Justice Department appellate lawyer, was named by Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-California, as the new general counsel. Hungar returned to his former firm, Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher, as a partner in January.
Last month, Letter hired Megan Barbero, a senior appellate lawyer at the Justice Department, as an associate general counsel. As of Tuesday, Barbero and Hamm were both identified as associate general counsels on the House general counsel office's website.
Hamm did not return messages seeking comment. Letter referred questions to Pelosi's office, which did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
A person familiar with Hamm's plans said she is joining the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission as an adviser to Chairman Jay Clayton.
Hamm has made appearances in court cases in which the House has asserted its voice as an institution. Those cases have involved public-records disputes, subpoena fights and health care matters.
On Tuesday, Hamm alerted U.S. District Judge Emmet Sullivan of the District of Columbia of her departure in a case involving a government watchdog group's request for communications between the White House, Department of Health and Human Services and Congress related to the Republicans' ultimately failed effort to repeal the Affordable Care Act.
The House general counsel's office, then led by Hungar, intervened on behalf of the House Ways and Means Committee in September 2017, arguing against the disclosure of congressional records he claimed were confidential.
Hamm's notice, a common filing for government lawyers who leave public service, said a colleague, Kristin Shapiro, an assistant general counsel in the office, would continue representing the House committee in the litigation.
Shapiro joined the general counsel's office in 2016 from Williams & Connolly, where she had been an associate. The office has one other assistant general counsel, Brooks Hanner, who joined the office from Hogan Lovells in July. He had been a senior associate there.
Hamm had previously helped defend the House against former FBI Director James Comey's bid to block a subpoena. Comey, represented by Dechert partners David Kelley and Vincent Cohen, eventually dropped his challenge after reaching what he called an “acceptable accommodation” to testify voluntarily.
Hamm leaves the House general counsel's office as Democrats appear increasingly poised to pursue documents from the Trump administration.
On Monday, the leaders of six House committees sent a letter to Attorney General William Barr demanding the full release of Special Counsel Robert Mueller III's report on the investigation into Trump and Russia's interference in the 2016 election. The House Judiciary Committee on Wednesday plans to begin authorizing subpoenas demanding the report, along with underlying evidence and materials.
“While we hope to avoid resorting to compulsory process, if the department is unwilling to produce the report to Congress in unredacted form, then we will have little choice but to take such action,” the committee leaders said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllDOJ, 10 State AGs File Amended Antitrust Complaint Against RealPage and Big Landlords
4 minute readSpecial Counsel Jack Smith Prepares Final Report as Trump Opposes Its Release
4 minute readPentagon Settles Suit Seeking to Clear Records of Service Members Discharged for Being LGBTQ
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Lawsuit alleges racial and gender discrimination led to an Air Force contractor's death at California airfield
- 2Holland & Knight Picks Up 8 Private Wealth Lawyers in Los Angeles
- 3Khan Defends FTC Tenure, Does Not Address Post-Inauguration Plans
- 4J.D. Vance Campaign Finance Challenge Leads December Supreme Court Petition Roundup
- 54th Circuit Revives Racial Harassment Lawsuit Against North Carolina School District
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250