House Judiciary Tees Up Subpoena for Unredacted Mueller Report
Rep. Jerrold Nadler said he will first negotiate with the attorney general before issuing the subpoena.
April 03, 2019 at 10:54 AM
3 minute read
The U.S. House Judiciary Committee has voted to authorize a subpoena to obtain Special Counsel Robert Mueller III's full report and its underlying evidence.
Panel chairman Jerrold Nadler, D-New York, said in opening remarks Wednesday that he asked U.S. Attorney General William Barr to work with the committee to get access to material covered under grand jury secrecy rules. “He has so far refused,” Nadler said. He said he would give Barr time to change his mind, but would issue subpoenas for the materials if they could not reach a deal.
“We will as appropriate go to court. We think we need a subpoena first,” Nadler said.
The 24-17 vote came over the objections of the panel's Republicans, who complained that Barr has already promised to release the report's contents, but that he was not permitted to disclose grand jury information.
But their concerns were overridden by the panel's Democrats, who said the public was entitled to see the grand jury material, pointing to examples set by the conclusions of special prosecutor Leon Jaworski's Watergate investigation and Ken Starr's inquiry into President Bill Clinton.
In demanding documents, Nadler said Wednesday it was Congress' “job, not the attorney general's, to determine whether or not President Trump has abused his office.”
Barr told lawmakers in a March letter that he would release a redacted version of Mueller's nearly 400-page report. He said the Justice Department, with Mueller's assistance, was “well along in the process” of reviewing and redacting any grand jury information in the document, along with any information that could interfere with ongoing investigations.
Barr closed the letter by saying he believed it would be appropriate for him to testify on the report shortly after its public release. He proposed a May 1 appearance before the Republican-led Senate Judiciary Committee followed the next day by a hearing with the House Judiciary Committee.
The House panel also voted Wednesday to subpoena the documents and testimony of former Trump White House officials and lawyers, including former White House Counsel Don McGahn and his former chief of staff, Ann Donaldson. Both left the administration last year.
The subpoenas also seek records related to former White House Chief of Staff Reince Priebus, chief strategist Steve Bannon, and communications director Hope Hicks.
Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan partner William Burck represents McGahn, Priebus, and Bannon; Trout Cacheris & Janis chairman Robert Trout represents Hicks.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'New Circumstances': Winston & Strawn Seek Expedited Relief in NASCAR Antitrust Lawsuit
3 minute read5th Circuit Rules Open-Source Code Is Not Property in Tornado Cash Appeal
5 minute readDOJ Asks 5th Circuit to Publish Opinion Upholding Gun Ban for Felon
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250