Prosecutors Back Lobbyist Sam Patten's Push for Leniency in Mueller Case
Sam Patten was willing and able to testify against Paul Manafort in Washington, prosecutors said.
April 08, 2019 at 02:09 PM
6 minute read
Without recommending a specific sentence, prosecutors said Monday that Washington lobbyist Sam Patten should receive credit for his cooperation with the government when he is sentenced this week for failing to disclose to U.S. authorities his past consulting work for a Ukrainian political party.
Patten, a onetime associate of former Trump campaign chairman Paul Manafort, pleaded guilty in August to violating the Foreign Agents Registration Act, an 80-year-old law that came to renewed prominence following Manafort's prosecution on charges related to his past lobbying work for the Russia-aligned government of former Ukrainian President Viktor Yanukovych. Manafort's prosecution at the hands of the special counsel's office, led by Robert Mueller III, marked the beginning of the Justice Department's renewed scrutiny of advocacy for international clients after decades of lax FARA enforcement.
Patten's case was referred to career prosecutors by Special Counsel Robert Mueller III's office.
In a court filing, prosecutors said Patten faces a maximum sentence of five years in prison but recommended that he be credited for the “cooperation and the substantial assistance he has provided to the government.”
“Consistent with the practice of the Special Counsel's Office, the government does not take a position with respect to a particular sentence to be imposed,” the prosecutors said.
Patten had been prepared to testify against Manafort in Washington, prosecutors said, adding that his experience as a political consultant overseas made him a “valuable resource for the government in a number of other criminal investigations.” He met with government investigators, either on the phone or in person, on nine separate occasions.
Patten, represented by Schertler & Onorato partner Stuart Sears, was charged last year with failing to register as a foreign agent in connection with his work for the Opposition Bloc, a political party in Ukraine. Prosecutors alleged that Patten sought to arrange for his Russian business partner and a member of the Opposition Bloc—identified in court papers as a “prominent Ukrainian oligarch”—to meet with members of Congress and their staffs, but failed to disclose those activities to the U.S. Justice Department.
Sears argued that Patten should avoid jail time, in a court filing that downplayed Patten's offense and appeared to draw distinctions between his case and Manafort's.
“Mr. Patten was never hired to lobby U.S politicians or to advocate for or against any specific U.S. policy. Mr. Patten did not create or hire intermediaries for the purpose of concealing from the American public or government his work on behalf of a foreign client. He did not charge exorbitant fees to advance his client's causes and did not hide his assets around the globe and far away from the IRS,” Sears said in a sentencing memo posted Monday.
Patten's defense lawyers continued: “And perhaps most importantly for a FARA case, he never concealed who his clients were. Instead, during the course of a long business relationship where Mr. Patten advised his clients on matters related solely to Ukrainian politics and elections, he did a few favors for his clients that crossed the line into FARA-registrable activity.”
U.S. District Judge Amy Berman Jackson is set to sentence Patten on April 12. In a letter to Jackson on March 28, Patten said he accepted “complete responsibility” and that he “should be punished for this.”
Patten, prosecutors said, focused his efforts on members of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee and House Committee on Foreign Affairs but also worked to arrange meetings with State Department officials and reporters. His failure to disclose the lobbying dated back to 2014, prosecutors said, adding his company raked in more than $1 million between the spring of 2015 and 2017 from its work for the Opposition Bloc.
“The activity was undertaken to promote the interests of [the Ukrainian oligarch] and the Opposition Bloc to influence U.S. policy,” prosecutors said in the charging documents. Prosecutors also alleged that Patten helped the Ukrainian oligarch draft op-eds targeted at the U.S. press.
As part of his plea deal, Patten admitted to brokering access to President Donald Trump's inauguration for a pro-Russian Ukrainian oligarch in a scheme designed to circumvent the federal prohibition on foreigners donating to such ceremonies.
At his sentencing Friday, Patten will find himself in front of a judge who has been immersed in foreign-lobbying issues for more than a year now.
Jackson presided over the special counsel's prosecution of Manafort in Washington, a case that included allegations that the longtime Republican operative failed to register under FARA and, through an unknowing attorney, misled the Justice Department about the nature of his work for Ukraine.
Berman's sentence—coming weeks after a federal judge in Alexandria, Virginia, sentenced Manafort on financial fraud charges—elevated Manafort's prison term to 7½ years.
At Manafort's sentencing, Jackson stressed that FARA was a criminal statute and not merely a “pesky regulation,” as many lobbyists came to view it after years of light enforcement.
“When people don't have the facts, democracy can't work,” she said, adding that Manafort had effectively lied to Congress and the American public by failing to properly disclose his work for Ukraine.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All3rd Circuit Nominee Mangi Sees 'No Pathway to Confirmation,' Derides 'Organized Smear Campaign'
4 minute readJudge Grants Special Counsel's Motion, Dismisses Criminal Case Against Trump Without Prejudice
Ex-Deputy AG Trusts U.S. Legal System To Pull Country Through Times of Duress
7 minute read'Even Playing Field?' Wiley Rein Intervenes in Federal Election Campaign Spending Row
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1As 'Red Hot' 2024 for Legal Industry Comes to Close, Leaders Reflect and Share Expectations for Next Year
- 2Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 3Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 4Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 5Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250