Greg Craig, Defiant After Lobbying Charges, Will Plead Not Guilty
The former Skadden partner and Obama White House counsel appeared Friday in Washington court. A defense lawyer for Craig, William Murphy of Zuckerman Spaeder, entered the not guilty plea on Craig's behalf.
April 12, 2019 at 01:56 PM
5 minute read
Greg Craig, a former partner at Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom who had served as President Barack Obama's first White House counsel, will plead not guilty to charges he lied to the Justice Department to avoid registering as a foreign agent in connection with his work for Ukraine, his defense lawyer told a judge Friday.
Craig's initial court appearance, before Magistrate Judge Deborah Robinson in Washington, came a year after he retired amid scrutiny connected to a report he prepared in 2012 for the Russia-aligned Ukrainian government on the prosecution of Yulia Tymoshenko, a former prime minister and political rival of the country's president at the time, Viktor Yanukovych.
A defense lawyer for Craig, William Murphy of Zuckerman Spaeder, entered the plea on Craig's behalf.
Craig and his lawyers have mounted an aggressive public relations campaign, attempting to get in front of prosecutors to portray the case as government overreach. It was Craig's defense team—through a PR team at TSD Communications Inc.—that announced the expected charges, and Craig signed up for Twitter on Thursday to post a video of himself reading a statement that defiantly challenged the government's case.
“This prosecution is unprecedented and unjustified. I am confident that both the judge and the jury will agree with me,” Craig said in the video, posted to YouTube.
On Thursday, prosecutors charged Craig, 74, with making false and misleading statements to the Justice Department between 2013 and 2014 as it inquired about whether he needed to disclose his Ukraine work under the Foreign Agents Registration Act, an 80-year-old law requiring lobbyists for foreign governments and other overseas interests to disclose their political activities in the United States.
Craig had wanted to avoid registering under FARA “at least in part because he believed doing so could prevent him or others at the law firm from taking positions in the federal government in the future,” according to the indictment.
But his reluctance to register was also rooted in considerations for the report itself, prosecutors said. A FARA registration would have required Skadden to reveal the full extent of its Ukraine work, including a consultation on a second trial of Tymoshenko, and disclose that the firm received more than $4 million to prepare the report.
Those details, prosecutors said, would have undermined the credibility of the report and Craig's purported independence in preparing it.
An Ivy League-educated luminary in Democratic circles, Craig has steadfastly professed his innocence, even as his firm agreed to pay $4.6 million—representing the amount it received from Ukraine—to resolve claims that it violated the foreign-lobbying disclosure law.
“This indictment accuses Mr. Craig of misleading the FARA Unit of the Department of Justice in order to avoid registration,” Craig's defense attorneys, William Taylor and William Murphy, said in a statement Thursday. “It is itself unfair and misleading. It ignores uncontroverted evidence to the contrary. Mr. Craig had no interest in misleading the FARA Unit because he had not done anything that required his registration. That is what this trial will be all about.”
As part of the settlement, Skadden registered retroactively as a foreign agent and, in the process, revealed that the firm understood Ukrainian billionaire Victor Pinchuk to be bankrolling the Tymoshenko report.
Announcing the settlement, the Justice Department said Skadden had, “in reliance on the lead partner,” made false and misleading statements concerning the firm's role in releasing the report to media outlets.
Craig insisted on including language in Skadden's contract with Ukraine specifying that the firm would not engage in political activities that would trigger the need to register under FARA. But the Justice Department said his work nonetheless veered into political territory as he provided copies of the Tymoshenko report to U.S. media outlets and spoke with reporters.
It was in response to inquiries from Justice Department, prosecutors said, that Craig misled authorities about his role in the media strategy around the Tymoshenko report.
Craig's defense lawyers have said he “repeatedly refused” to participate in Ukraine's media and lobbying campaign. His defense team has also said Craig spoke to The New York Times “not at the direction or on behalf of Ukraine but to make certain that the Times would accurately summarize the report's criticisms of the Tymoshenko trial and not rely on misinformation from Ukraine and its representatives.”
“He did not lie to his former firm or the government about these conversations. Furthermore, he was told by the FARA unit on January 16, 2014 that he was not required to register under the statute,” Craig's defense lawyers said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllJudge Grants Special Counsel's Motion, Dismisses Criminal Case Against Trump Without Prejudice
Ex-Deputy AG Trusts U.S. Legal System To Pull Country Through Times of Duress
7 minute read'Even Playing Field?' Wiley Rein Intervenes in Federal Election Campaign Spending Row
3 minute readBig Law Lawyers Fan Out for Election Day Volunteering in Call Centers and Litigation
7 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Del. Court Holds Stance on Musk's $55.8B Pay Rescission, Awards Shareholder Counsel $345M
- 2Another Senior Boeing Attorney Exits, This One for CLO Post at Jet-Maintenance Company
- 3Bridge the Communication Gap: The Benefits of Having (and Being) a Bilingual Mediator
- 4CFIUS Is Locked and Loaded, but What Lies Ahead for CFIUS Enforcement Activity?
- 5Deluge of Trump-Leery Government Lawyers Join Job Market, Setting Up Free-for-All for Law Firm, In-House Openings
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250