Lobbyist Sam Patten, Charged in Mueller Spinoff Case, Gets 3 Years' Probation
A federal judge in Washington sentenced Patten to three years of probation and ordered him to pay a $5,000 fine.
April 12, 2019 at 10:40 AM
5 minute read
Updated at 11:19 a.m.
Sam Patten, a Washington lobbyist and onetime associate of Paul Manafort, avoided prison time Friday on a charge that he failed to disclose past consulting work for a Ukrainian political party, as a federal judge in Washington sentenced him to three years of probation and ordered him to pay a $5,000 fine.
His sentencing before U.S. District Judge Amy Berman Jackson came eight months after he pleaded guilty to violating the Foreign Agents Registration Act, an 80-year-old law requiring the disclosure of U.S.-based lobbying for foreign governments and other interests. After decades of lax enforcement, the law returned to prominence in the prosecution of Manafort, who pleaded guilty last year to charges related to his own lobbying for Ukraine.
Patten pleaded guilty to communicating with U.S. lawmakers on behalf of the Opposition Bloc, a Russia-aligned political party in Ukraine, without disclosing that work to the Justice Department as required under FARA. Prosecutors alleged Patten sought to arrange for his Russian business partner and a member of the Opposition Bloc, identified in court papers as a “prominent Ukrainian oligarch,” to meet with members of Congress and their staffs.
As part of the plea deal, Patten also admitted that he brokered access to Trump's inauguration for a pro-Russian Ukrainian oligarch. The scheme, in which he arranged for a U.S. citizen to serve as a “straw donor” and give $50,000 to Trump's inaugural committee for four tickets to the event, was designed to circumvent the federal prohibition on foreigners contributing funds to such ceremonies.
The special counsel's office referred Patten's case to career federal prosecutors in Washington, who backed the longtime lobbyist's bid for leniency.
On Friday, Patten's defense attorney, Schertler & Onorato partner Stuart Sears, said his client had faced a choice “along the way in this case between his career and assisting the government.
“And he chose his country,” Sears said, adding that Patten had likely sacrificed his career in doing so.
“I think that's an important consideration for the court to take in this case,” he added.
Patten, who'd written a letter to Jackson in advance of Friday's hearing, said he “fully” appreciated the “seriousness of the offense with which I'm charged.”
“I pled guilty. I recognize the serious of my conduct and crimes I committed. I behaved as if the law did not apply to me, and that was wrong,” he said.
Jackson appeared struck by Patten's cooperation but said he had been accused of a number of offenses. “None of them were minor,” she said.
Echoing statements she made at Manafort's sentencing in March, Jackson stressed what she saw as the value of FARA in bringing transparency to the American political process. “The whole point and the only pt of the FARA statute is to ensure transparency in the political process and the legislative process and put people on notice of when a foreign government” is seeking to influence U.S. policy, she said.
“People need the facts for democracy to work,” she said.
But, noting his cooperation with prosecutors and other factors, Jackson said, “there are reasons your sentence is not going to be like [Manafort's] sentence.”
Days before sentencing, prosecutors said Patten should be credited for his cooperation with the Russia investigation, noting that he had been prepared to testify against Manafort in Washington. After he was found guilty of financial fraud in Alexandria, Virginia, Manafort pleaded guilty in Washington federal court to a pair of conspiracy charges connected to his past work for the pro-Russian government of Ukraine.
Patten met with government investigators, either in person or over the phone, on nine separate occasions. And his experience as an overseas political consultant made him a “valuable resource for the government in a number of other criminal investigations,” prosecutors said.
At Friday's sentencing, Jackson appeared miffed by the decision of prosecutors to not recommend a specific sentence for Patten. Prosecutors had declined to provide that specific recommendation, citing in a court filing the “practice of the special counsel's office.”
“I have to say, I'm not exactly sure where the new tradition of demurring instead of making a recommendation comes from. I believe the culprit may be in the courtroom,” she said, in an apparent reference to Andrew Weissmann, a top prosecutor on Mueller's team, who attended the sentencing.
Still, she described the prosecutors' court filing earlier in the week as “extremely supportive” of Patten's request for leniency.
“It is,” said prosecutor Fernando Campoamor-Sanchez.
Read more:
Greg Craig, Former Skadden Partner, Charged With Lying About Ukraine Work
Prosecutors Back Lobbyist Sam Patten's Push for Leniency in Mueller Case
Manafort Judge Says Foreign Lobbying Law Is No 'Pesky Regulation'
Charge Against DC Lobbyist Boosts Focus on Foreign-Agent Registration
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All5th Circuit Strikes Down Law Barring Handgun Sales to Adults Under 21
Apple Files Appeal to DC Circuit Aiming to Intervene in Google Search Monopoly Case
3 minute readDC Circuit Revives Firefighters' Religious Freedom Litigation in Facial Hair Policy Row
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Uber Files RICO Suit Against Plaintiff-Side Firms Alleging Fraudulent Injury Claims
- 2The Law Firm Disrupted: Scrutinizing the Elephant More Than the Mouse
- 3Inherent Diminished Value Damages Unavailable to 3rd-Party Claimants, Court Says
- 4Pa. Defense Firm Sued by Client Over Ex-Eagles Player's $43.5M Med Mal Win
- 5Losses Mount at Morris Manning, but Departing Ex-Chair Stays Bullish About His Old Firm's Future
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250