US Justice Department Names James Burnham to Key Civil Division Post
The former Jones Day associate and Trump White House lawyer will succeed Brett Shumate in a key litigation role at Main Justice.
April 12, 2019 at 05:21 PM
4 minute read
James Burnham, a top lawyer in the U.S. Justice Department's civil division who previously worked in the Trump White House counsel's office, is assuming a new role that will make him a more visible defender of Trump administration policies in court, according to people familiar with the move.
Burnham, a former Jones Day associate who is currently overseeing the civil division's consumer protection branch, was named Friday as the new deputy assistant attorney in charge of the federal programs section, which is tasked with representing the administration in trial courts across the United States.
A Justice Department spokeswoman confirmed that Burnham will lead the civil division's federal programs branch beginning next week.
A former clerk for retired U.S. Judge Alexander Kozinski of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, Burnham will replace Brett Shumate, who is stepping down from the role after two years crisscrossing the country in some of the most high-profile court challenges to Trump administration moves. Shumate was a lead Trump defender in disputes involving immigration policy, conflicts of interest and the Commerce secretary's decision to add a citizenship question to the 2020 census.
Shumate was also on the Justice Department team that recently abandoned the defense of the Affordable Care Act in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, endorsing a lower court's decision to void the Obama administration's signature health care law in its entirety. The former Wiley Rein partner has not announced his post-DOJ plans.
In Burnham, the Justice Department selected a lawyer close to U.S. Solicitor General Noel Francisco, the department's top appellate lawyer defending the Trump administration. Burnham was in the wave of Jones Day lawyers, a group of more than a dozen former partners and associates at the firm, who jumped to the Trump administration in 2017.
Burnham has already made a high-profile court appearance on behalf of the Trump administration, leading the defense of the White House's decision last year to revoke the press credentials of CNN reporter Jim Acosta.
A Trump-appointed federal judge ordered the White House to restore Acosta's press credentials after finding that administration officials had denied him an adequate opportunity to contest the process. U.S. District Judge Tim Kelly based his ruling largely on a 1977 decision in which the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit ruled that the White House must provide due process when revoking a reporter's press credentials. “I simply have no choice but to apply that precedent,” he said.
More recently, Burnham helped Attorney General William Barr through his Senate confirmation process. Burnham had previously aided the efforts to confirm Trump's two nominees to the U.S. Supreme Court, Justices Neil Gorsuch and Brett Kavanaugh.
At Jones Day, where Burnham reported earning $810,000, he was on the team that defended former Virginia Gov. Bob McDonnell against federal corruption charges. Burnham remained on the case as Jones Day appealed the conviction to the U.S. Supreme Court. The Supreme Court reversed the conviction and sent the case back to the trial court, prompting federal prosecutors to drop all charges against McDonnell and his wife.
Dechert partner Michael McGinley, a former Trump White House lawyer, described Burnham as a deft litigator and strategist who can plot cases from the trial court to the Supreme Court. Those skills, he said, would serve Burnham well in a role requiring coordination between the federal programs branch and civil appellate lawyers, along with the solicitor general's office.
“James is a brilliant and versatile litigator who will thrive in his new role,” McGinley said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllRead the Document: 'Google Must Divest Chrome,' DOJ Says, Proposing Remedies in Search Monopoly Case
3 minute readAmir Ali, MacArthur Justice Center Director, Confirmed to DC District Court
From ‘Deep Sadness’ to Little Concern, Gaetz’s Nomination Draws Sharp Reaction From Lawyers
7 minute readConservative Boutiques That Backed Trump Reap Their Rewards
Trending Stories
- 1Womans Suit Alleging Negligence to Sex Trafficking by Hotel Tossed by Federal Judge
- 2Dog Gone It, Target: Provider of Retailer's Mascot Dog Sues Over Contract Cancellation
- 3Lululemon Faces Legal Fire Over Its DEI Program After Bias Complaints Surface
- 4Plaintiff Gets $500K Policy Limit Without Surgery
- 5Philadelphia Bar Association Executive Director Announces Retirement
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250