August Trial Date Eyed in Case Against Greg Craig, Ex-Skadden Partner
"We'd like this case to be resolved as soon as possible,” Craig's defense lawyer William Taylor of Zuckerman Spaeder said in court Monday in Washington.
April 15, 2019 at 11:50 AM
4 minute read
A federal judge in Washington indicated Monday she would set an August trial date for Greg Craig, the former Obama White House counsel charged last week with misleading the U.S. Justice Department about his work for Ukraine as a partner at Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom.
U.S. District Judge Amy Berman Jackson agreed to hold Craig's trial in August after his lead defense lawyer, Zuckerman Spaeder partner William Taylor III, suggested scheduling it for that month.
“Your honor,” Taylor said, “to cut to the chase, we'd like this case to be resolved as soon as possible.”
A date as early as Aug. 5 was discussed but drew resistance from federal prosecutor Fernando Campoamor-Sanchez, who said the U.S. Attorney's Office in Washington was “hoping to get a little more time than that.” The brief hearing, held just days after Craig pleaded not guilty to charges he lied to the Justice Department, ended without Jackson setting a firm start date for the trial, which is expected to take up to two weeks.
At one point, as the lawyers and judge conferred about late summer travel schedules and other scheduling conflicts, Taylor told Jackson that his co-counsel William Murphy had plans to travel to Cooperstown, New York, home to the Baseball Hall of Fame, over Labor Day weekend. Murphy stood up to say the trip was an “annual pilgrimage.”
“Alright,” Jackson replied, “baseball's important.” She added: “I'd hope by then the jury has the case.”
Craig made an initial appearance before a magistrate judge last week after being charged with making false and misleading statements to the Justice Department concerning his past work for the Russia-aligned government of Ukraine.
Prosecutors have alleged that, in response to inquiries from the Justice Department, Craig lied and omitted information about his work in 2012 preparing a report on the prosecution of former Ukrainian prime minister Yulia Tymoshenko, a political rival of the country's president at the time, Viktor Yanukovych.
According to prosecutors, Craig made false and misleading statements about his interactions with the media in the rollout of the report, in part to avoid registering as an agent for Ukraine under a U.S. lobbying disclosure law.
Craig has adamantly denied for months that he misled U.S. authorities and has argued that his work did not fall under the Foreign Agents Registration Act, an 80-year-old law requiring the disclosure of U.S.-based lobbying for foreign governments and other overseas interests.
“This prosecution is unprecedented and unjustified. I am confident that both the judge and the jury will agree with me,” Craig said in a video that he posted last week on YouTube.
On Monday, in his first appearance before Jackson since the indictment, Taylor reiterated his contention that Craig is “entirely innocent.”
At the conclusion of Monday's hearing, Jackson relaxed travel restrictions on Craig, allowing him to venture beyond the Washington metro area after providing pretrial services with at least two days' notice. Jackson also ordered Craig to surrender his passport but left open the possibility that she would approve international travel.
Taylor, citing Craig's past service in the Clinton and Obama administrations, said travel restrictions were unnecessary, telling Jackson there was “no possibility that Greg Craig is not going to appear for trial in this case.” Craig has plans to travel abroad on Sept. 9, lawyers said Monday.
“That's reason to make sure we get started in mid-August,” Jackson said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllBinance's Singapore-Based General Counsel Is Shattering Crypto's 'Bro Ceiling'
4 minute readDC Circuit OKs Enforcement of Intra-EU Awards, Does Not Decide If Other Treaties' Awards May Be Enforced
7 minute readMike Lynch's Brush With Prison Taught Him Life Is Precious. Then a Yacht Accident Proved Him Right
Elon Musk's X 'Deceives Users' and Lacks Transparency, EU Alleges in First DSA Enforcement Action
3 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250