Buttigieg Worked With Jenner, and Warren Went With Perkins Coie: Disclosures
The early wave of campaign disclosures from Democratic presidential contenders shows ties to Big Law.
April 17, 2019 at 02:44 PM
4 minute read
Updated at 4:55 p.m.
U.S. Sen. Elizabeth Warren's presidential campaign turned to Perkins Coie as the Massachusetts Democrat embarked on her bid for the party's nomination, paying the firm $80,000 in February for legal consulting, according to a financial disclosure filed this week.
The expenditure was among several that provided a first glimpse at some of the Big Law connections established by Democratic contenders.
Between late February and mid-March, Peter Buttigieg's campaign paid Jenner & Block nearly $82,000 for legal consulting as the mayor of South Bend, Indiana, readied himself for the Democratic primary. His campaign, formally launched just days ago with an event in South Bend, reported paying Jenner & Block in three separate installments—the first and largest, totaling almost $45,500, on Feb. 25.
Jenner litigation partner Previn Warren in Washington is serving as general counsel to the Buttigieg campaign, a firm spokesperson said. Warren was a classmate of Buttigieg's at Harvard College.
The Warren and Buttigieg campaigns did not respond to requests for comment. A spokesman for Perkins Coie declined to comment on the firm's work.
Julian Castro's campaign reported a debt of nearly $20,000 to the Washington-based firm Utrecht, Kleinfeld, Fiori, Partners for legal services. Castro, whose fundraising did not rival some of the other contenders, joined the Obama administration as the secretary of Housing and Urban Development after serving as mayor of San Antonio.
U.S. Rep. Tulsi Gabbard, a Hawaii Democrat who began her presidential campaign in January, paid $10,000 to Bergeson in February and another $4,553 in legal fees to Dentons in early March, according to her disclosure.
The four Democrats were the only candidates who listed expenses for legal consulting in the first quarter of 2019, a three-month stretch that saw the primary field grow crowded with more than a dozen contenders.
New Jersey Democratic U.S. Sen. Cory Booker's campaign did not list a legal consulting expense, but it did report that it owes about $28,000 to Capitol Compliance Associates, a Washington-based firm specializing in campaign finance, for “compliance and financial management” services.
U.S. Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand, D-New York, reported paying two firms—Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr, along with Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom. Neither payment was for legal services.
Skadden was paid more than $1,200 for “reception-catering and facilities,” according to Gillibrand's disclosure, and Wilmer received about $300 in early March for “reception-catering.” The payments put the two firms in the company of Nocking Points Wine and Oliver Cheng Catering And Events as beneficiaries of the Gillibrand campaign's reception and catering budget.
Meanwhile, the Trump campaign spent $1.64 million on legal consulting, with the bulk of those expenditures going to Jones Day.
The firm, whose alumni have filled prominent posts within the Trump administration and received nominations to the federal bench, received nearly $1.25 million from the campaign in the first three months of 2019, a total that tracks closely with what Jones Day received in late 2018.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllPaul Weiss’ Shanmugam Joins 11th Circuit Fight Over False Claims Act’s Constitutionality
‘A Force of Nature’: Littler Mendelson Shareholder Michael Lotito Dies At 76
3 minute readUS Reviewer of Foreign Transactions Sees More Political, Policy Influence, Say Observers
'Unlawful Release'?: Judge Grants Preliminary Injunction in NASCAR Antitrust Lawsuit
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250