The Billion-Dollar Club Is Chock Full of Firms With Large DC Footprints
Washington held its own in the latest Am Law 100 rankings.
April 23, 2019 at 05:36 PM
2 minute read
Seven 2019 Am Law 100 firms with their largest office in Washington, D.C., cracked $1 billion in annual revenues last year, placing them among the nation's top grossing 35 firms.
Those firms are Hogan Lovells (ranked seventh in the Am Law 100), Morgan, Lewis & Bockius (eighth), Jones Day (ninth), Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr (28th), Covington & Burling (29th), Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld (30th), and Squire Patton Boggs (34th). Some of these firms are more typically associated with other markets—such as Philadelphia, Ohio and the Midwest—but they have their largest offices in D.C., according to available ALM data.
Hogan Lovells, Morgan Lewis and Jones Day all saw revenue climb by 4 percent or more last year, but the D.C. firm in the 10-figure club with the most startling growth is Covington.
Revenues jumped more than 18 percent at Covington last year, helping the firm hurdle eight spots in the rankings to leapfrog D.C.-based competitor Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer. With revenue growth of 1 percent last year, Arnold & Porter ranked 40th with revenues of $961.2 million.
Other firms with their largest offices in D.C. and Virginia were concentrated in the middle of the pack: McGuireWoods (49th), Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman (61), and Venable (65). Pillsbury's revenues grew 9.6 percent and Venable's revenues grew 5.5 percent, but each firm dropped one spot in the Am Law 100 this year.
Three brick-and-mortar institutions finished in the final 15 of the rankings, namely Williams & Connolly (86th), Crowell & Moring (95th), and Steptoe & Johnson LLP (96th). Crowell dropped 13 spots this year amid a 4.2 percent revenue decline, and could be in danger of becoming a Second Hundred firm if its revenue continues to decline as it has for the previous two years. Steptoe, meanwhile, maintained its ranking despite revenue growth of 3.7 percent.
Much of the D.C. market experienced a year of modest growth, with the biggest of Big Law continuing to remain competitive with their counterparts in New York and California.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSo You Want to Be a Tech Lawyer? Consider Product Counseling
BCLP Exploring Merger Prospects as Profitability Lags, Partnership Shrinks
Anticipating a New Era of 'Extreme Vetting,' Big Law Immigration Attys Prep for Demand Surge
6 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Friday Newspaper
- 2Judge Denies Sean Combs Third Bail Bid, Citing Community Safety
- 3Republican FTC Commissioner: 'The Time for Rulemaking by the Biden-Harris FTC Is Over'
- 4NY Appellate Panel Cites Student's Disciplinary History While Sending Negligence Claim Against School District to Trial
- 5A Meta DIG and Its Nvidia Implications
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250