Conservative Big Law Veterans Raise Specter of Trump Impeachment
Signatories on the new statement include Big Law attorneys Peter Keisler of Sidley Austin; King & Spalding's Marisa Maleck; and John Bellinger III of Arnold & Porter.
April 24, 2019 at 03:19 PM
5 minute read
A new statement from Checks & Balances, a group of high-profile conservative lawyers, is urging Congress to “conduct further investigation” into behavior detailed in the Mueller report that is “starkly inconsistent with the president's constitutional duty to 'take care that the laws be faithfully executed.'''
The 11 signatories of the statement posted Tuesday included several Big Law attorneys: Peter Keisler of Sidley Austin; King & Spalding's Marisa Maleck, a former law clerk to Justice Clarence Thomas; and John Bellinger III of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer. The letter came with a disclaimer: “Each of us speaks and acts solely in our individual capacities, and our views should not be attributed to any organization we may be affiliated with.”
Also on the list of signers was retired Jones Day partner Donald Ayer; Jonathan Adler, professor at Case Western Reserve University School of Law, and George Conway III, of counsel at Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz and a persistent President Donald Trump critic whose wife is Kellyanne Conway, a close adviser to Trump.
Stuart Gerson, a Justice Department official under President George H.W. Bush, a member of Becker Epstein & Green, and a co-author of the statement, said Wednesday that the group is “not urging” impeachment as such, but “our view is more like, if something is to be done about it, here are the facts.”
The lawyers wrote, “We call on Congress to conduct robust, bipartisan oversight to ensure that the threats posed by ongoing foreign malign activities are addressed as matters of the highest priority as we increasingly near the 2020 election.”
In addition, they said, “We believe the framers of the Constitution would have viewed the totality of this conduct as evidence of high crimes and misdemeanors. Accordingly, Congress, which carries its own constitutional oversight responsibilities, should conduct further investigation.”
Asked if the signers' stance might get them in trouble professionally, Gerson said that if anything, members of the group are “being rewarded” for speaking out. Administration officials, other lawyers and even some judges have contacted and applauded the members of the group confidentially, urging them to continue to advocate for the rule of law, he said.
Trump has rebuffed the rising dialogue about impeachment. “If the partisan Dems ever tried to Impeach, I would first head to the U.S. Supreme Court,” Trump said Wednesday. He did not articulate what action he would take, if any, if House Democrats did begin impeachment proceedings.
Members of Checks & Balances are not filing amicus briefs as a group, but some members, including Keisler, have appeared on briefs that take positions against the Trump administration. Keisler and fellow Sidley partner Carter Phillips were amicus parties on a brief filed Tuesday in California challenging the Trump administration's use of a national emergency declaration to fund a border wall to which Congress has not allotted any funding.
Ayer, Gerson and Paul Rosenzweig, formerly senior counsel to Kenneth Starr in the Whitewater investigation, said in an op-ed Wednesday at USA Today that “Mueller's report convincingly demonstrates systematic actions by the president to obstruct an ongoing criminal investigation, irrespective of whether a sitting president can be indicted.
Last year, Maleck, the King & Spalding associate in Washington, appeared on an MSNBC program to talk about her position as a conservative lawyer who's questioning the president's attacks on constitutional norms.
“What's a little concerning is I do think people look at him and say, well, look at all these judges, we're really shaping the judiciary, let's sort of ignore it, he's just sort of blustering. But his words have legal effect,” said Maleck, who clerked for Thomas in the 2015-2016 term. “When he tweets something, people respond. To me, it's not enough to just sort of say we have Justice Kavanaugh, we have Justice Gorsuch so there's nothing to see here. There's plenty of things to see. When you start corroding constitutional norms over time, and switching out dialogue about it, all of a sudden we don't have a functioning democracy any more.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllShaq Signs $11 Million Settlement to Resolve Astrals Investor Claims
5 minute readAm Law 100 Partners on Trump’s Short List to Replace Gensler as SEC Chair
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250