Judge Sentences Maria Butina 18 Months in Prison
The sentence marks a win for prosecutors after Butina's defense attorneys asked for a sentence of time served.
April 26, 2019 at 11:27 AM
4 minute read
A Russian woman who tried to ingratiate herself with American political conservatives ahead of the 2016 election was sentenced on Friday to 18 months in prison by a federal judge.
Maria Butina was sentenced by Judge Tanya Chutkan of the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia on a single count that she conspired to act as an unregistered Russian agent. Butina pleaded guilty in December in exchange for federal prosecutors dropping a second charge against her.
After Butina spoke Friday expressing remorse for her actions, Chutkan ordered the 18-month sentence. Butina also will be deported back to Russia “promptly” after she completes her sentence. She has already served nine months in jail, for which she'll be credited.
The sentence marks a win for prosecutors, who had sought an 18 month-sentence for Butina. Her defense attorneys—McGlinchey Stafford partner Robert Driscoll and associate Alfred Carry—sought a sentence of time served and an order for her immediate deportation to Russia.
In handing down the sentence, Chutkan said that it “may be true” that, if Butina had notified the Justice Department, her conduct would have been legal. “But it's because she did not register that her conduct was so dangerous and a threat to our country's democratic institutions.”
The judge noted that she certainly agreed that Butina, who came to the U.S. as a graduate student at American University, was “a legitimate and hard working student.” At the same time, Chutkan said she was “not simply seeking to learn about the U.S. political system.”
Nor was Butina's offense a mere failure to register with the government, the judge said. Chutkan described how Butina sought to gain connections with organizations for Russia's benefit, at a time when Russia was acting to interfere and affect the American political process. Chutkan stressed that her conduct was “sophisticated.”
“This was not a simple misunderstanding by an overeager foreign student,” Chutkan said. Before she handed her sentence, she told Butina: “You're a young woman, you're smart. … You have a future ahead of you, I wish you the best of luck.”
Friday's hearing drew to a close a months long legal saga for Butina, who admitted she worked at a former Russian government official's direction as she cozied up to powerful conservatives and National Rifle Association members in an effort to influence U.S. policy toward Russia. Butina initially pleaded not guilty last summer to charges relating to her unregistered work at the behest of Alexander Torshin, a former deputy governor of Russia's central bank.
Butina's case drew wide interest and fueled public speculation that she was a Russian spy. Even in the week leading up to Friday's sentencing, there were renewed questions of whether Butina's work amounted to espionage, as the government pushed an 18-month sentence for her. Her defense attorneys sought a sentence of time served and her immediate deportation back to Russia.
Federal prosecutors last week filed a declaration from a former FBI counterintelligence official who described how Russian intelligence could benefit from the information Butina provided them.
The official, David Anderson, said Russian intelligence services could use Butina's information “for years to come in their efforts to spot and assess Americans who may be susceptible to recruitment as foreign intelligence assets.”
Butina's defense attorneys accused the filing of raising a “wholly new theory of espionage activity” at the eleventh hour, and sought to strike the declaration from the record. Chutkan on Thursday denied that motion, noting Butina's attorneys “had notice” of prosecutors' intent to use the FBI official as a witness or to submit a declaration from him, since April 10.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSplit 4th Circuit Ruling Is a Win for Covington & Burling in US Army Base Attack Litigation
3 minute readA Conversation with NLJ Lifetime Achievement Award Winner Jeff Smith
11 minute readBiden's Nominee Secures U.S. Senate Confirmation for Phila. Federal Judgeship
3 minute read'Export Violations'?: RTX Settles Civil Charges With $200M Consent Agreement
3 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250