Skadden's Foreign-Lobbying Settlement Is Off-Limits at Greg Craig's Trial
The government has agreed it won't use Skadden's settlement agreement with the government, nor the law firm's retroactive FARA registration as evidence at the trial.
April 26, 2019 at 10:50 AM
3 minute read
Federal prosecutors have agreed not to offer as evidence at Greg Craig's trial the settlement his former law firm, Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom, reached in January to resolve claims that it failed to disclose past work for the Russia-aligned government of Ukraine.
Craig, a former Skadden partner in Washington who earlier served as the top lawyer in the Obama White House, is charged in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia with misleading authorities about his preparation of a report on the prosecution of Yulia Tymoshenko, a former prime minister of Ukraine and political rival of the country's president at the time, Viktor Yanuovych. Craig, represented by a team from Zuckerman Spaeder, contends he was not required to disclose his work under the Foreign Agents Registration Act, an 80-year-old law requiring the disclosure of lobbying work for foreign governments and other overseas interests.
Craig has pleaded not guilty. His trial, which is expected to last two weeks, is set to begin Aug. 12.
In January, Skadden agreed to pay $4.6 million to resolve U.S. Justice Department claims that the law firm violated the Foreign Agents Registration Act, or FARA, for work it conducted for Ukraine beginning in 2012. Skadden retroactively registered as a foreign agent of the Ukrainian government. The settlement amount represented the firm's earnings from the Tymoshenko report.
“We believe that, based on this agreement, neither the Settlement Agreement nor the Skadden FARA filings will be raised by either party in any way during Mr. Craig's trial,” according to the filing submitted on Friday by Craig's lawyers and the prosecution team. “However, each party reserves the right to ask the court for permission to introduce this evidence in rebuttal and/or in response to any argument or evidence offered by the other party that makes it relevant to the jury's determination of the charges.”
The testimony agreement, which still requires the approval of Judge Amy Berman Jackson, includes a stipulation that the government will limit the scope of testimony for two unidentified witnesses.
Craig's defense team said it will not elicit testimony from one of those witnesses regarding communication with Craig after Jan. 16, 2014, and the government will not seek to cross-examine a witness about communication and events that occurred after Jan. 16, 2014.
The government said it won't introduce Skadden's retroactive registration as a foreign agent for Ukraine.
Sealed proceedings were held earlier in front of U.S. District Judge Beryl Howell in Washington over attorney-client privilege matters involving Craig. Jackson first noted those proceedings in an order last week. She had planned to review that litigation, but she said Friday that there is no need for her to do so at this time.
Read the notice filed Friday in D.C. federal court:
Read more:
Ex-Partner's Fight Against Lobbying Charges to Put Skadden Back in Limelight
Greg Craig, Defiant After Lobbying Charges, Pleads Not Guilty
Registering as a 'Foreign Agent'? Why Law Firms Might Demur.
DOJ Leader Raises Specter of Civil Actions Targeting Foreign Influence
Skadden Registers Ukraine Advocacy After Settling DOJ's Lobbying Case
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'A Shock to the System’: Some Government Attorneys Are Forced Out, While Others Weigh Job Options
7 minute readHogan Lovells, Jenner & Block Challenge Trump EOs Impacting Gender-Affirming Care
3 minute readGOP Now Holds FTC Gavel, but Dems Signal They'll Be a Rowdy Minority
6 minute readDC Lawsuits Seek to Prevent Mass Firings and Public Naming of FBI Agents
3 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250