Greg Craig's Lawyers Bash 'Vague, Cryptic and Confusing' Charges
Defense lawyers for the former Skadden partner and Obama White House counsel contend the indictment "jumbles allegations about written statements together with inferences about oral representations."
April 30, 2019 at 02:27 PM
4 minute read
The defense lawyers for Gregory Craig, a former Obama White House counsel and Big Law partner in Washington, are pushing back against prosecutors and demanding the government provide more details about allegations that he lied about his advocacy for the government of Ukraine.
Craig, a former Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom partner in Washington, has pleaded not guilty to charges he misled the Justice Department to avoid registering as a foreign agent in connection with his past work for Ukraine. He is represented by a team from Zuckerman Spaeder. Craig retired from Skadden last year as the criminal investigation was unfolding.
Central to the government's case is Craig's role in the preparation of a report, in 2012, on the Ukrainian government's prosecution of Yulia Tymoshenko, a former prime minister and political rival of the country's president at the time, Viktor Yanukovych.
Tuesday's court filing asks U.S. District Judge Amy Berman Jackson of the District of Columbia to force the government to provide with greater particularity details about the indictment. The filing marked the first significant glimpse of how Craig plans to challenge prosecutors. Craig's lawyers also said they planned soon to file papers asking Jackson to dismiss the indictment.
“When it comes time to identifying the actual false or misleading statements, the indictment is vague, cryptic, and confusing,” Craig's lawyers, including William Taylor III and William Murphy, said in the new filing.
Craig's lawyers contend he was not required to disclose that work under the Foreign Agents Registration Act, or FARA, an 80-year-old law requiring the disclosure of lobbying work carried out in the United States for foreign governments and other overseas interests. The law has played an outsized role in prosecutions stemming from the special counsel's investigation of Russia's interference in the 2016 presidential election.
“Mr. Craig contends that neither he nor his law firm engaged in any conduct that required FARA registration, and that he did not mislead the FARA Unit in any way,” Craig's lawyers wrote in a court filing Tuesday. “In fact, Mr. Craig and his law firm did not register under FARA because they believed, after careful consideration of the issue, that the firm's work for Ukraine did not require registration.”
Prosecutors said in charging documents that the “purpose of FARA is to prevent covert influence by foreign principals. Proper registration under the statute allows the U.S. government and the American people to evaluate the statements and activities of individuals who are serving as agents of foreign principals.”
The defense team also hammered at the fact the government allegedly does not have recordings or other notes from key meetings involving Craig and lawyers from the Justice Department's FARA unit.
“The indictment was prepared many years after the events in question, and memories have faded. The government has no written record to elucidate the allegations of false oral statements—or perhaps to dismantle them—and depends entirely upon the recollections of participants that are vague, incomplete and unreliable,” Craig's lawyers said in the new court filing. “Despite the self-evident risk of mistake and misremembering, the government pursues criminal charges alleging that Mr. Craig lied to the FARA unit.”
Craig's lawyers said the indictment “jumbles allegations about written statements together with inferences about oral representations. There is no itemization of what statements are alleged to be false as opposed to those alleged to be misleading.”
Craig's indictment came just months after Skadden reached a $4.6 million settlement with the Justice Department resolving claims that the firm failed to register under FARA. As part of the settlement, Skadden registered retroactively as a foreign agent.
Last week, federal prosecutors revealed that they had agreed to not offer Skadden's settlement as evidence at Craig's trial.
Read more:
Skadden's Foreign-Lobbying Settlement Is Off-Limits at Greg Craig's Trial
Greg Craig, Defiant After Lobbying Charges, Will Plead Not Guilty
Registering as a 'Foreign Agent'? Why Law Firms and Lobby Shops Might Demur.
DOJ Leader Raises Specter of Civil Actions Targeting Foreign Influence
Skadden Registers Ukraine Advocacy After Settling DOJ's Lobbying Case
Mike Scarcella contributed reporting from Washington.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrump Administration Faces Legal Challenge Over EO Impacting Federal Workers
3 minute readUS Judge Cannon Blocks DOJ From Releasing Final Report in Trump Documents Probe
3 minute readPrivate Equity Giant KKR Refiles SDNY Countersuit in DOJ Premerger Filing Row
3 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250