Jones Day
Ensuring that we work identically for all clients, regardless of income, influence or resources, feeds the soul of people who care deeply about principles of justice and rule of law.
April 30, 2019 at 11:59 PM
3 minute read
Describe your firm's philosophy on pro bono service.
With privilege comes great responsibility. That responsibility is rooted in a mission of broad and deep service to the communities that have been instrumental to our success. We have a long history of commitment to pro bono legal service, public service and community involvement. Our commitment to pro bono service is as critical to the firm's institutional character as is our successful representation of paying clients.
Of the big cases your firm recently worked on, Jones Day lawyers tried a case to verdict on behalf of a young Ethiopian woman trafficked by a U.S. State Department employee. That was one of the first civil TVPA cases to be tried to verdict in the U.S. Tell us more about the case and how you reached the outcome.
Sarah was a live-in housekeeper for a former State Department employee and her husband, the Howards. The Howards targeted Sarah when they met her on Embassy grounds. When they finally lured her into their household, Sarah was sexually assaulted and raped for nearly seven months, all while being told that this was part of her job and threatened into silence. Sarah eventually escaped the Howards' home, and after many years, filed suit. We conducted interviews and an investigation, which culminated in a five-day trial where we called Sarah, two other fact witnesses, and an expert on human trafficking. The jury returned the favorable verdict, which we successfully defended in the Fourth Circuit a year later.
What was the most satisfying aspect of that key case?
The moment our client realized she had gotten justice against her abuser. Throughout the entire trial, Sarah had been publicly reliving an incredibly traumatic experience; she was exposed and vulnerable. When the jury returned with the verdict, she did not immediately understand. We then looked her in the eye and told her, "You won." Her eyes filled up with tears and she said, "They believed me?"
Discuss other key pro bono matters recently completed by the firm.
In December 2018, we won asylum for a married couple who are former police officers from El Salvador marked for death by the Mara 18 and MS-13 gangs. The husband disrupted a prison smuggling scheme and his wife provided evidence leading to the conviction of a gang member for murder. As community leaders, both openly and actively opposed gang violence. They fled after receiving death threats from the gangs. We won asylum for both clients after more than 20 months of asylum proceedings, including detention proceedings, motions for bond, transfer of venue and consolidation, and a joint asylum trial. DHS waived appeal. Our clients are now free and safe.
Why does your pro bono work matter to you as a lawyer?
As lawyers who believe in justice and rule of law, and typically represent institutions that often have the best of everything, pro bono gives us the chance to deploy those same resources on behalf of individuals who often have nothing. Ensuring that we work identically for all clients, regardless of income, influence or resources, feeds the soul of people who care deeply about principles of justice and rule of law.
Responses submitted by Laura K. Tuell, firmwide head of pro bono at Jones Day.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllBig Law Practice Leaders 'Bullish' That Second Trump Presidency Will Be Good for Business
3 minute readBig Law Leaders, Dealmakers Optimistic About M&A Deal Flow Under Trump, With Caveats
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Infant Formula Judge Sanctions Kirkland's Jim Hurst: 'Overtly Crossed the Lines'
- 2Trump's Return to the White House: The Legal Industry Reacts
- 3Election 2024: Nationwide Judicial Races and Ballot Measures to Watch
- 4Climate Disputes, International Arbitration, and State Court Limitations for Global Issues
- 5Judicial Face-Off: Navigating the Ethical and Efficient Use of AI in Legal Practice [CLE Pending]
- 6How Much Does the Frequency of Retirement Withdrawals Matter?
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250