Morrison & Foerster
From securing elections to putting the government to its burden in criminal cases to protecting the rights of the disabled, every case is vitally important to the clients and to me.
April 30, 2019 at 11:59 PM
3 minute read
Describe your firm's philosophy on pro bono service.
Morrison & Foerster has a proud tradition of pro bono leadership. We have established a formal expectation that all MoFo lawyers make meaningful pro bono contributions throughout their careers. Our guiding principle is to accord equal dignity and equal rigor to our pro bono endeavors. We encourage lawyers to find their passion in pro bono, and we dedicate extraordinary resources to helping them contribute their best through pro bono work.
Of the big cases your firm recently worked on, one included a win for Georgia voting rights. Tell us more about that case and how you reached the outcome.
We employed a three-part strategy: (i) we narrowed our case to moot defendants' immunity defenses; (ii) we engaged the country's leading election integrity expert to hack a Georgia voting machine and alter the results in the courtroom; and (iii) we induced the defendants to put key election officials on the stand to defend the election system, knowing cross-examination would elicit many security deficiencies in that system. Consequently, the court rejected the immunity defenses (which the 11th Circuit affirmed) and found that defendants had taken a "head in the sand" approach to election security, creating powerful precedent for election security challenges. With the time crunch of midterms behind us, we're now well positioned to win preliminary and permanent injunctions this year.
What was the most satisfying aspect of that key case?
Nothing is more fundamental to our republic than secure elections reflecting the will of the voters. This institution is under attack from forces within and without the country. The court's decision breathes new life into critical efforts across the U.S. to thwart those attacks by requiring secure, reliable voting systems, even when legislatures and executives do not. The court's decision validating our theory and concerns was incredibly satisfying and encouraging.
Discuss other key pro bono matters recently completed by the firm.
Highlights of our lawyers' achievements through their collective 78,000 hours of pro bono work in the last year include: Parents who care for foster children in Hawaii are receiving substantially increased stipends for their care. Before we filed suit in 2013, foster care stipends were unchanged for 25 years.
Individuals with mental disabilities or mental illness in Los Angeles—many of them homeless or close to it—no longer face structural barriers when applying for General Relief benefits. A Texas law that stigmatized women seeking abortion by requiring burial or cremation of fetal remains was enjoined.
Recipients of short-term housing subsidies in Washington, D.C., are protected by the city's ban on "source of income" discrimination.
Why does your pro bono work matter to you as a lawyer?
Our pro bono work provides an opportunity to help protect the rights of those who cannot afford to do so themselves. It's an important reminder that justice isn't truly available to all because it often comes at considerable cost. From securing elections to putting the government to its burden in criminal cases to protecting the rights of the disabled, every case is vitally important to the clients and to me.
Responses submitted by Jennifer Brown, senior pro bono counsel at Morrison & Foerster, and David Cross, partner in the firm's global antitrust practice.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTopping Kirkland, Weil Won the Most Valuable Major Bankruptcy Retentions of 2024
New Year Brings New Partner Hires for White & Case, Venable, Winston & Strawn
3 minute readWhy Hogan Lovells and Perkins Coie Reversed, Will Now Pay Out Special Bonuses to Associates
4 minute readLongtime Baker & Hostetler Partner, Former White House Counsel David Rivkin Dies at 68
2 minute readTrending Stories
- 1You Too Can Be a Programmer: Connecting to Legal Platform APIs With Generative AI (Part 2)
- 2Court of Appeals and Appellate Division As Courts of First Instance
- 3Federal Judge Slaps Down the SEC’s Attempt to Regulate Crypto Liquidity Providers
- 4A Client Is Guilty; But Another Man Is Wrongfully Convicted
- 5Legal Tech's Predictions for Cybersecurity in 2025
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250