Munger, Tolles & Olson
Helping people overcome disadvantages through the law not only fulfills a moral duty, it is deeply rewarding.
April 30, 2019 at 11:59 PM
4 minute read
Describe your firm's philosophy on pro bono service.
Service to the community through pro bono work is one of Munger, Tolles & Olson's core values. Our firm dedicates more than 3 percent of all attorney time to pro bono work each year on cases covering a wide spectrum. In addition, the firm's partner-funded MTO Foundation contributes significantly to providers of legal services to underserved communities.
Of the big cases your firm recently worked on, one included a landmark trial victory in New Mexico. Tell us more about that case and how you reached the outcome.
As co-counsel to MALDEF and New Mexico Center on Law and Poverty, Munger Tolles won a landmark trial demonstrating that the state of New Mexico's inadequate education system deprives children of the educational opportunities needed for college, career and civic life, thereby denying them due process and equal protection. During the two-month trial, educational experts testified about the needs of New Mexico students and systemic deficiencies undermining student success; school superintendents testified that their districts lack resources, quality programs and state support; and families testified about the lack of educational opportunity in the state's schools. The state's experts and officials were forced to concede that, while students at high-poverty schools have less access to effective teachers, the state has failed to provide adequate resources to improve teacher training, compensation, recruitment and retention.
What was the most satisfying aspect of that key case?
We pride ourselves on handling the most complex cases in the country and offering assistance to those most in need. This case was the perfect marriage of those two aims. Routinely ranked at the bottom in terms of academic performance and graduation rates, New Mexico is a state desperately in need of educational reform. While much work remains to be done, this case will have a profound impact on the future of New Mexico, and thus, our country.
Discuss other key pro bono matters recently completed by the firm.
As co-counsel to the ACLU, Munger Tolles obtained a classwide preliminary injunction barring the city of Los Angeles from enforcing "gang injunctions," which the city uses to prevent individuals the city has decided are gang members from participating in various ordinary, legal activities. As co-counsel to the Native American Disability Law Center, Munger Tolles obtained a landmark federal court ruling that schools run by the Bureau of Indian Education (BIE) are obligated to address the mental health and wellness needs of all students. As co-counsel to Public Counsel, Munger Tolles obtained a settlement calling for the county of Los Angeles to implement new policies to prevent inmates with mental illnesses from being released without arrangements for managing their mental health.
Why does your pro bono work matter to you as a lawyer?
As professionals and officers of the court, we owe a duty to contribute to the public good. While there are many lawyers in the profession, too many individuals in need lack access to the legal system and access to justice. Helping people overcome disadvantages through the law not only fulfills a moral duty, it is deeply rewarding. Whether through impact litigation or representing an individual client, this type of work can fundamentally change people's lives for the better.
Responses submitted by E. Martin Estrada, a litigator at Munger, Tolles & Olson, and lead trial counsel on the New Mexico educational rights case.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSo You Want to Be a Tech Lawyer? Consider Product Counseling
BCLP Exploring Merger Prospects as Profitability Lags, Partnership Shrinks
Anticipating a New Era of 'Extreme Vetting,' Big Law Immigration Attys Prep for Demand Surge
6 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250