New Lawsuit Pits Dentons Against Former Government Contracts Leader
Jessica Abrahams, who now heads the government contracts group at Drinker Biddle, claims Dentons owes her close to $400,000 after she fled the firm over alleged mismanagement. Dentons says it was the one left holding the bag.
April 30, 2019 at 11:44 AM
3 minute read
The former chair of Dentons' government contracts group, Jessica Abrahams, claims in a lawsuit that the megafirm owes her close to $400,000 and that it bad-mouthed her to clients when she left the firm.
Dentons counters that Abrahams left with nearly $2 million in unpaid billings when she departed for Drinker Biddle & Reath a year ago, calling her suit a “diversion” from her own failures to meet her commitments to the firm.
Abrahams practiced at McKenna Long & Aldridge for more than a decade ahead of its merger with Dentons in 2015. After the firms merged, Abrahams' suit alleges, Dentons was bound by a side letter to its partnership agreement concerning its obligations to return capital to former McKenna partners if they left the firm. She alleges that, when she left Dentons for Drinker Biddle, the firm did not adhere to its commitment and demanded she repay a 2016 bonus.
Her suit, filed Monday in the Superior Court of the District of Columbia, demands $390,400 plus interest and fees. But while Abrahams' formal claims are for breach of contract or, in the alternative, conversion, her brief complaint also includes a single paragraph reciting a litany of alleged abuses and mismanagement at Dentons that she says led to her exit.
“Abrahams learned of numerous significant accounting and billing irregularities and resultant tax issues,” the complaint asserts. “The environment at the firm also was one that ignored open and obvious sexual harassment, and gender and age discrimination. Abrahams also found that Dentons' management rewarded personal relationships over merit in determining compensation and promotion. Further, Dentons consistently failed to make budget after the merger. Abrahams discovered after the merger that Dentons had failed to make budget for years before the merger, which was not disclosed to MLA's partners.”
Abrahams claims her attempts to leave the firm were hindered by Dentons' management. She alleges the firm's leaders “made false representations to multiple clients concerning the quality of her work in an unethical and unlawful attempt to persuade clients to stay with Dentons,” causing her largest client to not follow her to Drinker Biddle, where she leads the government contracts group.
Dentons blasted the allegations in an emailed statement Tuesday.
“Ms. Abraham's pleading is a kitchen sink attempt to publicly disparage Dentons that is tellingly void of substance as the firm fulfilled its obligations to her,” the statement said. “The reality is that, when Ms. Abrahams left, Dentons was owed more than $1.8 million from her clients and those fees and costs largely remain outstanding today. The complaint, which was filed after Dentons expressed concerns about these receivables and her compliance with her partnership obligations, is a blatant and baseless attempt to divert attention from these key facts and her failure to resolve these issues.”
Abrahams is represented by Mark London and Lance Robinson of London & Mead. An initial scheduling conference in the case is set for Aug. 16.
Abraham's complaint is below:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllA Look Back at High-Profile Hires in Big Law From Federal Government
4 minute readArnold & Porter Matches Market Year-End Bonus, Requires Billable Threshold for Special Bonuses
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Trailblazing Broward Judge Retires; Legacy Includes Bush v. Gore
- 2Federal Judge Named in Lawsuit Over Underage Drinking Party at His California Home
- 3'Almost an Arms Race': California Law Firms Scooped Up Lateral Talent by the Handful in 2024
- 4Pittsburgh Judge Rules Loan Company's Online Arbitration Agreement Unenforceable
- 5As a New Year Dawns, the Value of Florida’s Revised Mediation Laws Comes Into Greater Focus
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250