Covington & Burling
Law firms can help close this gap, particularly in cases like these that require substantial expertise and resources.
April 30, 2019 at 11:59 PM
3 minute read
Describe your firm's philosophy on pro bono service.
Covington regards pro bono service as a professional obligation of each firm lawyer—with the privilege we all have as lawyers, comes a responsibility to give back. Covington seeks input from each individual lawyer about pro bono work that would best serve the public good. Our pro bono program is therefore voluntary, diverse and driven by our lawyers' interests, though anchored in increasing access to justice for economically disadvantaged individuals.
Of the big cases your firm recently worked on, one involved representing the city of Los Angeles to prevent the federal government from attaching grant money to local immigration policies. Tell us more about the case and how you reached the outcome.
We were thrilled when Los Angeles City Attorney Mike Feuer reached out to Covington after then-U.S. Attorney General Jeff Sessions announced he would withhold federal funding for local law enforcement from municipalities that refused to participate in federal immigration enforcement. These federal actions threatened to reduce or eliminate vital funding, and also to undermine longstanding policies on how LA's police engage with our immigrant community.
We assembled a cross-office team that included some of our strongest constitutional advocates and experienced litigators. The team has done everything from case investigation and arguing summary judgment motions, to handling two Ninth Circuit appeals. They, and the City Attorney team, have dedicated substantial time and energy to challenge the Department of Justice's unconstitutional practices, and the results reflect this dedication.
What was the most satisfying aspect of that key case?
It has been remarkably satisfying to work with our hometown to ensure local autonomy over critical law enforcement policies. Los Angeles welcomes immigrants from all over the world, and our city's law enforcement officials years ago determined that working collaboratively with all members of the community is the best way to build trust and keep everyone safe.
Discuss other key pro bono matters recently completed by the firm.
In 2018, Covington achieved many victories in both civil rights impact cases and individual direct representations. The firm obtained a nationwide injunction blocking the federal government from rescinding the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program, which has allowed more than 200,000 young immigrants to continue to live and work in the United States. Covington also challenged Milwaukee Police Department's unconstitutional stop-and-frisk policies and practices that disproportionately targeted black and Latino individuals. The firm negotiated a favorable settlement, which mandates significant MPD reforms to training, supervision and discipline. Also in 2018, in partnership with National Veterans Legal Services Program, Covington lawyers helped more than 60 veterans seeking benefits for military service-connected injuries and in seeking military discharge status upgrades.
Why does your pro bono work matter to you as a lawyer?
In California and nationally, there is a large "justice gap," with many more clients who cannot afford counsel than there are lawyers to help them. Law firms can help close this gap, particularly in cases like these that require substantial expertise and resources. It is a privilege to work in a firm that understands we must take responsibility for our communities and our country.
Responses submitted by Alan Pemberton, co-chair of the public service committee, and Mitchell Kamin, co-chair of the commercial litigation practice group at Covington & Burling.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTopping Kirkland, Weil Won the Most Valuable Major Bankruptcy Retentions of 2024
New Year Brings New Partner Hires for White & Case, Venable, Winston & Strawn
3 minute readWhy Hogan Lovells and Perkins Coie Reversed, Will Now Pay Out Special Bonuses to Associates
4 minute readLongtime Baker & Hostetler Partner, Former White House Counsel David Rivkin Dies at 68
2 minute readTrending Stories
- 1You Too Can Be a Programmer: Connecting to Legal Platform APIs With Generative AI (Part 2)
- 2Court of Appeals and Appellate Division As Courts of First Instance
- 3Federal Judge Slaps Down the SEC’s Attempt to Regulate Crypto Liquidity Providers
- 4A Client Is Guilty; But Another Man Is Wrongfully Convicted
- 5Legal Tech's Predictions for Cybersecurity in 2025
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250