McGuireWoods
As lawyers we have a critical and unique responsibility to ensure access to justice for others. Unfortunately, that access is scarce or unavailable for those of limited means. Without pro bono work, these individuals would not know justice.
April 30, 2019 at 11:59 PM
3 minute read
Describe your firm's philosophy on pro bono service.
McGuireWoods looks to take on transformative issues in its pro bono work, but the primary objective of that work is to help people facing life-changing circumstances who lack the resources to hire lawyers overcome challenges. If that results in a U.S. Supreme Court victory that changes public policy, a record-setting judgment or a better way to battle homelessness, that's just an additional benefit of doing good for our communities.
Of the big cases your firm recently worked on, you represented a human trafficking victim who was introduced into a cult at age 2. Tell us more about that case and how you reached the outcome.
Betsy Hutson met Kendra Ross in 2015 through an aftercare shelter for human trafficking survivors. Over the course of the following two years, Betsy worked to earn Kendra's trust and discuss the possibility of filing a lawsuit against the regimented cult and its leader, Royall Jenkins, who forced Kendra to work without pay, benefits or breaks for over a decade. In 2017, a dedicated team of McGuireWoods' attorneys filed a complaint on behalf of Kendra and helped her navigate the difficult steps of litigation. In May 2018, Kendra was awarded nearly $8 million—the largest civil single-plaintiff trafficking award in U.S. history. The court's opinion provides invaluable precedent for other trafficking survivors seeking justice.
What was the most satisfying aspect of that key case?
The most satisfying part of Kendra's case was the evidentiary hearing in Kansas in February 2018. Kendra had the incredible courage to return to the epicenter of the cult, take the stand in open court, and testify against her traffickers. After the hearing, the judge walked down from the bench, shook Kendra's hand, expressed sincere compassion toward her, and said it was a true honor and privilege to meet her.
Discuss other key pro bono matters recently completed by the firm.
The firm won a Fourth Amendment case at the U.S. Supreme Court, with the high court ruling that police officers without a warrant cannot use the automobile exception to enter a home's curtilage to access a vehicle. The decision changed the way police nationwide are trained to conduct searches. Partner and appellate practice co-chair Matt Fitzgerald led the pro bono McGuireWoods team (all under age 35), which included two former U.S. Supreme Court clerks. Additionally, McGuireWoods helped establish "Charlotte Triage," in which firm lawyers and corporate general counsel help Charlotte, North Carolina, legal aid providers help underprivileged clients fight evictions, open doors for employment and housing, and preserve access to health care.
Why does your pro bono work matter to you as a lawyer?
As lawyers we have a critical and unique responsibility to ensure access to justice for others. Unfortunately, that access is scarce or unavailable for those of limited means. Without pro bono work, these individuals would not know justice. Performing pro bono work at the firm confirms our commitment to making justice available for as many people as we can, regardless of their ability to pay us.
Responses submitted by Scott Oostdyk, a litigation partner at McGuireWoods.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFrom ‘Deep Sadness’ to Little Concern, Gaetz’s Nomination Draws Sharp Reaction From Lawyers
7 minute readNelson Mullins, Greenberg Traurig, Jones Day Have Established Themselves As Biggest Outsiders in Atlanta Legal Market
7 minute readEx-Deputy AG Trusts U.S. Legal System To Pull Country Through Times of Duress
7 minute readShareholder Activists Poised to Pounce in 2025. Is Your Board Ready?
Trending Stories
- 1Eagle Pharma Founder Sues Company to Recoup Cost of SEC Investigation
- 2GC Conference Takeaways: Picking AI Vendors 'a Bit of a Crap Shoot,' Beware of Internal Investigation 'Scope Creep'
- 3Legal Events for Georgia Lawyers
- 4'There is No Time to Waste': Matt Gaetz Withdraws From AG Nomination
- 5The Growing PFAS Morass: Why Insurance Should Cover These Products Liability Claims
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250