Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison
As a lawyer, I am duty bound to safeguard the rule of law and to represent those in need.
April 30, 2019 at 11:59 PM
3 minute read
Describe your firm's philosophy on pro bono service.
Pro bono is an indispensable element of practice at Paul Weiss, just as important as work for paying clients. This fervent commitment to pro bono is what brought so many of us here, including me. Our lawyers are reflexively and viscerally committed to doing the right thing, so there is never a doubt that we will step up to protect the rule of law, as we have throughout our history.
Of the big cases your firm recently worked on, one included representing families who were separated at the Mexico border. Tell us more about that case and how you reached the outcome.
When the family separation crisis began, lawyers lacked a playbook for a crisis of this magnitude. We focused on finding solutions that transcended a single case and identifying gaps in the response, developing a project to locate the parents of over 200 separated children so that those families could be reunified. We represented parents in detention centers, securing the release of many. We facilitated one of the first reunifications of a child under five, pursuant to a court deadline in the Ms. L litigation.
We continue to lead a court-appointed Steering Committee to vindicate the rights of separated parents deported without their children and have helped lead efforts to build a national coalition of lawyers to represent the families post-release.
What was the most satisfying aspect of that key case?
I am enormously proud of the work of nearly 100 Paul Weiss lawyers involved in the Steering Committee in Ms. L on behalf of 420 separated parents deported without their children. Their work has facilitated nearly 150 family reunifications. Working with NGOs, and drawing on Paul Weiss technology experts, we located all but a handful of parents. Amid unprecedented chaos, we identified a pressing need and made an indelible impact.
Discuss other key pro bono matters recently completed by the firm.
We've been challenging state-by-state laws that violate a woman's right to a safe, legal abortion and recently won a ruling striking down Mississippi's 15-week abortion ban. Now we're fighting Mississippi's new "fetal heartbeat" abortion ban.
On the anti-gun violence front, our two-year collaboration with 10 law firms and three NGOs through the Firearms Accountability Task Force is continuing to bear fruit; the Sandy Hook victims' families recently won their appeal before the Connecticut Supreme Court, holding gun makers liable under state unfair trade practices statutes. The court adopted a position advocated by us in our amicus brief. And we were heavily involved in successful voter protection litigation, particularly in Georgia's gubernatorial race.
Why does your pro bono work matter to you as a lawyer?
As a lawyer, I am duty bound to safeguard the rule of law and to represent those in need. My parents, both attorneys, and my mentors, Judge Simon Rifkind and Arthur Liman, a former partner at the firm, ingrained in me the importance of serving others. I am privileged to lead a law firm with 1,000 supremely talented lawyers and an ethos, developed over more than a century, to use those resources for the public good.
Responses submitted by Brad Karp, chairman of Paul Weiss.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSo You Want to Be a Tech Lawyer? Consider Product Counseling
BCLP Exploring Merger Prospects as Profitability Lags, Partnership Shrinks
Anticipating a New Era of 'Extreme Vetting,' Big Law Immigration Attys Prep for Demand Surge
6 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Judge Denies Sean Combs Third Bail Bid, Citing Community Safety
- 2Republican FTC Commissioner: 'The Time for Rulemaking by the Biden-Harris FTC Is Over'
- 3NY Appellate Panel Cites Student's Disciplinary History While Sending Negligence Claim Against School District to Trial
- 4A Meta DIG and Its Nvidia Implications
- 5Deception or Coercion? California Supreme Court Grants Review in Jailhouse Confession Case
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250