Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr
As lawyers, we have certain skills, and using them on behalf of people for whom such help is otherwise unavailable helps to make the world a fairer, more just place.
April 30, 2019 at 11:59 PM
3 minute read
Describe your firm's philosophy on pro bono service.
Wilmer encourages all lawyers, including new associates and summer associates, to participate in a wide variety of pro bono activities. We endorse the principle that every lawyer has a professional responsibility to use a portion of his or her time for pro bono legal service and recognize that pro bono work often exposes lawyers to types of legal and professional work that is not otherwise readily available.
Of the big cases your firm worked on, one included representing Robert McCoy in the McCoy v. Louisiana case. Tell us more about that case and how you reached the outcome.
McCoy was a fascinating, foundational case. As Mr. McCoy was under sentence of death, the stakes could not have been higher. Plus, the facts were so stark and the legal principle so arresting: Against Mr. McCoy's expressed wishes, his lawyer told the jury he was guilty. People have a sense that such an admission is improper, but identifying the relevant constitutional principle and its limits proved a challenge. Our principal argument was that criminal defendants have a Sixth Amendment autonomy right to not have their lawyers admit their guilt to the jury when they specifically instruct their lawyers not to. The justices based their opinion largely on this ground, adopting points we made in our briefs and at oral argument.
What was the most satisfying aspect of that key case?
Obtaining a fair outcome for our client (and, we hope, others who are similarly situated) was certainly the most satisfying aspect of the representation, but so was our role in helping to establish a fundamental rule regarding the balance a lawyer must draw between respecting his client's right to make certain fundamental decisions, on the one hand, and using his own best professional judgment in vigorously advancing the client's interests.
Discuss other key pro bono matters recently completed by the firm.
In 2019, the Sixth Circuit denied the Social Security Administration's petition for rehearing en banc of its holding that SSA's eligibility redetermination procedures are unconstitutional and violate the Administrative Procedure Act. As many as 2,000 indigent individuals stand to benefit.
We concluded our representation of Ms. C, a human trafficking victim. U.S.-based individuals trafficked her from Cambodia to California in 2013 and forced her to work in their homes and businesses without pay. We secured a discharge upgrade to "honorable" for Helen Grace James, who was given an "undesirable" discharge from the military in 1955 for being lesbian. After nearly 60 years, Ms. James has finally received the recognition she deserves, including eligibility for military honors at her funeral.
Why does your pro bono work matter to you as a lawyer?
Pro bono work is important because it is a great way to help truly advance the main calling of our profession, which is to try and achieve justice. As lawyers, we have certain skills, and using them on behalf of people for whom such help is otherwise unavailable helps to make the world a fairer, more just place. Mr. McCoy's case is a good example.
Responses submitted by Christopher Herrling, pro bono counsel, and Seth Waxman, co-chair of the appellate and Supreme Court litigation practice at Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSo You Want to Be a Tech Lawyer? Consider Product Counseling
BCLP Exploring Merger Prospects as Profitability Lags, Partnership Shrinks
Anticipating a New Era of 'Extreme Vetting,' Big Law Immigration Attys Prep for Demand Surge
6 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250