Robins Kaplan
Few professions offer the ability to change people's lives forever. Being a lawyer is one that does.
April 30, 2019 at 11:59 PM
3 minute read
Describe your firm's philosophy on pro bono service.
As our firm's chairman, Marty R. Lueck, put it, "we believe everyone is entitled to effective, zealous representation, not just the rich and powerful." Robins Kaplan attorneys view pro bono work as a professional and moral responsibility and profoundly personally fulfilling. We set high expectations: all attorneys are required to contribute at least 50 hours of pro bono work each year.
Of the big cases your firm recently worked on, one included achieving a consent decree that will require enforceable reforms of the Chicago Police Department. Tell us more about that case and how you reached the outcome.
On Oct. 20, 2014, Laquan McDonald was shot 16 times by the Chicago Police Department. In the following year, the [Department of Justice] opened an investigation into the CPD's "use of force, including racial, ethnic and other disparities in use of force." The DOJ released its findings of patterns and practices of "unnecessary and avoidable uses of force," and "identified serious concerns about the prevalence of racially discriminatory conduct." However, the DOJ under the Trump administration declined to pursue a federal court consent decree to achieve meaningful reform. The then-Illinois attorney general, Lisa Madigan, sought pro bono co-counsel to pursue a civil rights action on behalf of the people of Illinois based on the findings of the DOJ report. Robins Kaplan was honored to help litigate, negotiate, and ultimately achieve the reforms set out in the consent decree.
What was the most satisfying aspect of that key case?
Judge [Robert] Dow held a public fairness hearing to hear from members of the public. Over 90 individuals addressed the need for the consent decree. This hearing reflected authentic democracy in action, and vindicated the dedication to bring reform to Chicago. As Judge Dow explained, the consent decree aims to ensure that "policing in Chicago is done fairly, transparently and without bias, affording dignity to those who are served and protected."
Discuss other key pro bono matters recently completed by the firm.
In 2018, we helped secure a victory on behalf of a transgender woman incarcerated by the Missouri Department of Corrections (MDOC). A federal district court permanently prohibited MDOC from enforcing a policy that denied doctor-recommended health care to transgender people as cruel and unusual punishment.
We also helped a detained Cameroonian woman obtain asylum. In addition to working tirelessly with experts and witnesses for the hearing, our attorneys were personally invested in the case. They waited several hours for their client's release from detention and personally assisted her through TSA at the airport so she could board a flight to be reunited with her sister.
Why does your pro bono work matter to you as a lawyer?
Few professions offer the ability to change people's lives forever. Being a lawyer is one that does. And pro bono work offers the ability to do that for people in need of it the most—the poor, the disadvantaged, and those who live in the shadows of life. Pro bono work is not only a privilege for lawyers, but a responsibility.
Responses submitted by Patrick Arenz, a partner and high-stakes trial lawyer at Robins Kaplan.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrump's SEC Overhaul: What It Means for Big Law Capital Markets, Crypto Work
Holland & Knight, Akin, Crowell, Barnes and Day Pitney Add to DC Practices
3 minute readFrom ‘Deep Sadness’ to Little Concern, Gaetz’s Nomination Draws Sharp Reaction From Lawyers
7 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250