Sullivan & Cromwell
As a lawyer working in a large firm on matters that typically center on disputes about money, I feel it is important to spend time on cases that raise important policy issues that matter to real people's lives.
April 30, 2019 at 11:59 PM
3 minute read
Describe your firm's philosophy on pro bono service.
Pro bono work is a core value of S&C. We represent clients in high-stakes pro bono litigation that impacts their livelihood and liberty, but we also leverage our storied corporate expertise for creative efforts on behalf of unconventional clients.
In addition to matters we handle on our own, we regularly partner with our clients and nonprofit organizations with the aim to strengthen the communities within which we work and live.
Of the big cases your firm recently worked on, one included representing Success Academy Charter School to help it secure independence. Tell us more about that case and how you reached the outcome.
The Success Academy case involved an effort by the New York City Board of Education to dictate virtually every aspect of pre-kindergarten classes provided by charter schools, despite a 2014 state law which clearly provides that all regulation of pre-K classes offered by charter schools is the responsibility of the relevant charter entity. In the case of Success Academy, that charter entity is the State University of New York. We prevailed in the case by keeping the courts focused on the crucial language in the statute and urging them to reject the many broad policy arguments asserted by the New York Attorney General's office and the NYC Corporation Counsel in an effort to escape the statute's plain meaning.
What was the most satisfying aspect of that key case?
The most satisfying aspect of the case was persuading a majority of the New York Court of Appeals to apply the statute based on the words actually used by the legislature, rejecting the tortured interpretation advanced by our adversaries. As a result of that victory, charter schools like Success Academy can compete with local school districts by providing innovative pre-K classes that help small children learn.
Discuss other key pro bono matters recently completed by the firm.
In addition to representing minors separated from parents at the U.S. border, we also partnered with Immigration Equality to secure a district court win for clients Andrew Dvash-Banks and his son Ethan.
After Andrew, an American, and his Israeli husband, Elad, were married in Canada, a surrogate gave birth to Ethan and his twin brother. But, because Ethan was genetically related to Elad, the U.S. consulate did not grant Ethan the same U.S. citizenship status as his twin. The court held that Ethan acquired U.S. citizenship at birth, a victory that will impact binational families globally.
Why does your pro bono work matter to you as a lawyer?
As a lawyer working in a large firm on matters that typically center on disputes about money, I feel it is important to spend time on cases that raise important policy issues that matter to real people's lives. Some of my most-gratifying work has been on pro bono cases where we provide Sullivan & Cromwell's signature excellence to clients who otherwise could not afford that level of legal representation.
Responses submitted by Jessica Klein, head of pro bono practice, and Steve Holley, litigation group partner at Sullivan & Cromwell.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrump's SEC Overhaul: What It Means for Big Law Capital Markets, Crypto Work
Holland & Knight, Akin, Crowell, Barnes and Day Pitney Add to DC Practices
3 minute readFrom ‘Deep Sadness’ to Little Concern, Gaetz’s Nomination Draws Sharp Reaction From Lawyers
7 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250