'Set Your Ground Rules Early' and 10 Other Tips on Becoming a Good Judge
And here's another tip from former judge and current Oregon Attorney General Ellen Rosenblum: Don't fake what you don't know.
May 10, 2019 at 03:10 PM
5 minute read
When Oregon Attorney General Ellen Rosenblum was asked recently to talk to the National Judicial College about how to be a good judge, she told college president Benes Aldana, “You know Ben, I'm really not a judge anymore.”
Aldana replied, “Yes you are. Once a judge, always a judge.” So Rosenblum, who served for 22 years as a trial and appellate judge in Oregon before becoming the state's elected attorney general in 2012, agreed to speak to a group of newly minted state and local judges in April about becoming a good judge.
Rosenblum told the National Law Journal that her main message was to urge her audience not to become “judicial couch potatoes,” withdrawing from community involvement for fear of violating judicial ethics rules.
Certainly, Rosenblum said, judges should abide by ethical canons, but even so, “there is so much you can do as a judge in the community.” She said, “a lot of judges don't think they can do anything” outside of their judicial duties. In her own career as a judge, Rosenblum initiated a citizen conference to improve public understanding of the judicial system and a “Tell it to the Judge” event in which judges answered questions from the public at shopping malls.
But in planning her April talk, at the last minute, Rosenblum decided to add a list of suggestions on how new judges can become good judges. “People like lists. These are the things that popped into my head, and for me, having gone from being a trial judge to an appellate judge also gave me a perspective that I thought might be helpful.”
Some of the 11 tips she offered may seem surprising. One tip urges judges to develop helpful relationships with lawyers, jurors, fellow judges and even journalists.
Ellen RosenblumFor example, Rosenblum encouraged judges to mentor lawyers in their community. “Going for a walk with or taking a young lawyer out to coffee might be the most thrilling moment of that lawyer's career thus far. It will also get you out of the courthouse and into the fresh air for a healthy break,” she told the new judges.
In the interview with NLJ, Rosenblum cautioned that this type of contact shouldn't occur with “the lawyer who's on the case in front of you.” But as a judge, she recalled, “I realized how little it takes up from my time to have an impact on a young person who is getting started or maybe in a transition. I can take half an hour out of my day. I don't do it every day, but it's just amazing how helpful and important that could be.”
Other lawyer-friendly advice from Rosenblum: Give lawyers enough time to establish their record, and don't hesitate to ask lawyers to educate them on issues on which they may not be experts.
Another tip: “Set your ground rules early when it comes to discovery practice.” Rosenblum said: “If the lawyers believe you are in control, they will get along better, and your role as referee will take up less of your precious time.”
On making the record, Rosenblum said, judges should make the time “even if you are feeling antsy about the time and ready to move on. I didn't realize the importance of this until I became an appellate judge and the records simply didn't always match up to the arguments—sometimes on account of an impatient trial judge.”
As for asking to be educated, she said, “It is okay to say you are new to the subject matter—no one expects you to be an expert. You are a judge of general jurisdiction for a reason, and lawyers will respect you for not trying to fake what you don't know.”
Rosenblum also urged new judges to make collegiality with their colleagues a priority, to chat with jurors after a trial is over, and to never say “no comment” to an inquiring journalist. On the last point, she said, “There's almost always something you can say [to a journalist] that is a matter of public record. If not, just consider a question as an opportunity to educate the media as to why you are unable to discuss the case.”
Read more:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'A Horrible Reputation for Bad Verdicts': Plaintiffs Attorney Breaks Down $129M Wrongful-Death Verdict From Conservative Venue
Meet the Pacific Northwest Judges Who Rejected the Kroger-Albertsons Supermarket Merger
4 minute read11 Red State AGs Demand Damages in Antitrust Lawsuit Shaming ESG Climate Investors
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250