Preet Bharara Digs at Kobach's Private-Jet Wishes: 'I Made No Such Demands'
The former Manhattan U.S. attorney spoke in Washington at the Compliance Week conference, where other lawyers, including Stefan Passantino, made remarks about their time in public service.
May 21, 2019 at 02:23 PM
5 minute read
On Tuesday morning, former U.S. Attorney Preet Bharara did something he doesn't do much anymore in his new life as a law professor, author and professional podcaster.
He wore a tie.
The occasion was the Compliance Week conference, an annual gathering in Washington where Bharara had delivered remarks years earlier as the top federal prosecutor in Manhattan. “Since then,” Bharara said, “I was fired by the president. So I don't have to wear a tie quite so often.”
The buttoned-up style stopped at the clothing, as Bharara—once described in a New Yorker headline as “The Man Who Terrifies Wall Street”—gave joking reminders of his unceremonious ouster and riffed on the administration of President Donald Trump.
“People don't mention it in the introduction because they think they're being polite. But I was—I was fired,” Bharara said, pausing as the crowd broke out in laughter. “And I'm not unproud of that, by the way.”
His reflection on the beginning of his tenure as U.S. attorney for the Southern District of New York drifted to the news of the day—a New York Times report that Kris Kobach, the former secretary of state of Kansas, demanded around-the-clock access to a jet as a condition of becoming the Trump administration's “immigration czar.” Among the other conditions were walk-in privileges with the president and assurances he would eventually be nominated to lead the Department of Homeland Security.
“Kris Kobach, who has certain views about immigration—and, as both an American and as an immigrant, I disagree with some of those views—apparently has been auditioning for the job of immigration czar and made various demands that have been reported in The New York Times. If I had known you could make demands like that, I might've asked for a couple things,” Bharara said. “He asked for ready access to a jet to go home on weekends. Basically no-knock entry to the oval office. Jelly beans. Moon pies.”
“I made no such demands, just, 'Please don't kick me out.'”
The Trump administration on Tuesday was reportedly expected to pick former Virginia Attorney General Ken Cuccinelli for the immigration policy role.
Bharara spoke the same morning as Stefan Passantino, who served as a top deputy under Trump's former White House counsel, Donald McGahn. Passantino, now a partner at Michael Best & Friedrich, had been tasked with standing up and running what he called the “ethics and compliance program for the Trump administration.”
“I knew what I signed up for when I signed up for it. I got what I signed up for,” he said, drawing laughter from the crowd.
Passantino said his role in the White House Counsel's Office was not to represent any individual but rather the “institution of the presidency.” McGahn elevated the compliance role inside the White House Counsel's Office “due in no small part,” Passantino said, to “having sort of seen, based on his work on the campaign, that possibly in this administration ethics might be an issue and it might help to have somebody with a little bit grayer hair come in who was going to be able to do that.”
Passantino said he was hired to handle the on-boarding process for administration after years of counseling former House speakers, including Newt Gingrich, on political compliance issues.
“I guess there was some degree of thinking, 'Well, if this person can help keep Newt Gingrich on the straight and narrow for 20 years, then maybe this is our guy. So I was brought in for that purpose,” Passantino said.
Passantino said the administration presented challenges with a number of officials who had not previously served in government and had “not traditionally even served in public companies.”
In private practice, Passantino is representing Trump and his businesses in an effort to prevent House Democrats from obtaining years of financial records. A federal judge this week denied Trump's bid to block his longtime accounting firm from providing records to the House Oversight and Reform Committee.
On Tuesday, Trump's legal team took the case to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit.
Read more:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All4th Circuit Revives Racial Harassment Lawsuit Against North Carolina School District
3 minute readFenwick and Baker & Hostetler Add DC Partners, as Venable and Brownstein Hire Policy Advisers
2 minute readDOJ, 10 State AGs File Amended Antitrust Complaint Against RealPage and Big Landlords
4 minute readSpecial Counsel Jack Smith Prepares Final Report as Trump Opposes Its Release
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Some New Twists and Old Tricks for an Ethical New Year
- 2TikTok Hit With California Class Action for Allegedly Mining Children's Data Without Parental Consent
- 3New York Latest to Adopt NextGen Bar Exam
- 4People in the News—Jan. 9, 2025—Rawle & Henderson, Armstrong Teasdale
- 5Thinking Outside the RFP: AI’s Impact Beyond Scaling Review Efficiency
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250