Senate Green-Lights LA Munger Partner Daniel Collins for 9th Circuit Seat
The confirmation from the full Senate on Tuesday came despite objections from California's Democratic senators.
May 21, 2019 at 02:42 PM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on The Recorder
For the second time in as many weeks, the Republican majority in the U.S. Senate has confirmed a California-based nominee to sit on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit over the objections of the state's two Democratic senators.
The Senate voted 53-46 on Tuesday to approve the nomination of Daniel Collins, a partner at Munger, Tolles & Olson in Los Angeles. Sens. Dianne Feinstein and Kamala Harris withheld the so-called blue slips for Collins that home-state senators traditionally return to the Senate Judiciary to indicate their sign off on a nominee for a federal judicial seat based in their state. The full Senate vote comes just a week after the full Senate voted 52-45 to confirm Jenner & Block partner Kenneth Lee to the Ninth Circuit, whom the senators also opposed.
While the senators' opposition to Lee hinged on his initial failure to hand over controversial college writings to judicial vetters, with Collins, they raised concerns about what their judicial selection committee called issues of “temperament and rigidity.”
“In particular, we were told that Mr. Collins has a history of taking strong litigation positions for no reason other than attempting to overturn precedent and push legal boundaries,” the senators said in a joint statement in January.
Collins, a graduate of Harvard University and Stanford Law School, served as a summer associate at Munger in 1988 before clerking for Judge Dorothy Nelson at the Ninth Circuit and Justice Antonin Scalia at the U.S. Supreme Court. He served as an attorney adviser in the Justice Department's Office of Legal Counsel from 1989 to 1991, and as an assistant U.S. attorney in the Central District of California from 1992 to 1996 before returning to Munger, where he made partner in 1998. Collins served as associate deputy attorney general from 2001 to 2003 before returning to Munger. where he's practiced ever since with a focus on appellate and complex civil litigation.
According to financial disclosures Collins made to the Senate during the nomination process, he earned $1,228,852 in partnership income from Munger in 2017, $900,600 in 2018, and had made $120,100 at the time of the filing Feb. 6. According to the attached financial statement, Collins has $587,707 in the firm's capital account. Munger had profits per equity partner of $1,838,000 for 2018, according to The American Lawyer.
The Senate disclosure forms also indicated that Collins has an undisclosed amount in the firm's defined-contribution plans and cash balance defined benefit plan, which he planned to roll over into individual retirement accounts upon confirmation.
Collins' confirmation means that the Ninth Circuit now will have six judges appointed by President Donald Trump among its 27 current active judges. Before Collins and Lee, Judge Bridget Bade, who previously served as a magistrate judge in the District of Arizona, was confirmed to the court in March in a 78-21 vote. Trump also appointed Circuit Judges Mark Bennett, Ryan Nelson and Eric Miller to Ninth Circuit seats based in Hawaii, Idaho and Washington, respectively.
Harris and Feinstein have objected to Trump's nomination of Kirkland & Ellis partner Daniel Bress to fill another vacant Ninth Circuit seat left empty after former Chief Judge Alex Kozinski abruptly retired in 2017 amid sexual harassment allegations. In January the senators released a joint statement saying that Bress was based in Washington, D.C., and is young and lacks judicial experience. The senators last week both released statements again raising objections to Bress, saying he has voted in Virginia for the past decade and isn't based in California. Bress is scheduled to appear before the Senate Judiciary Committee, where both California senators sit, for a nomination hearing Wednesday morning.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllWilmer, Miles & Stockbridge, and Polsinelli Hire Litigation, Government Contract Attorneys
2 minute read'Sharp and Profound' Policy Shifts Prompt DC Law Firms to Evaluate Opportunities, Challenges
5 minute readTrump Election-Interference Prosecution Appears on Course to Wind Down
4 minute read'Rapidly Closing Window': Progressive Groups Urge Senate Votes on Biden's Judicial Nominees
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Judicial Ethics Opinion 24-58
- 2Sweet James Clinches $17.4M Personal Injury Jury Verdict in California's Kings County
- 3In Lame-Duck Session, US Senate Confirms Illinois Federal Judge on Bipartisan Vote
- 4Gordon Rees Opens 80th Office, ‘Collaboration Hub’ in Palo Alto
- 5The White Stripes Drop Copyright Claim Against Trump Campaign
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250