DC Circuit Is Urged to Fast-Track Trump's Subpoena Appeal
The proposed schedule would push the dispute into mid-July, and during that time the House would agree to suspend the production of documents that are required by the subpoena to Mazars.
May 22, 2019 at 07:15 PM
5 minute read
Lawyers for Donald Trump and for the U.S. House on Wednesday asked a Washington federal appeals court to expedite its review of a congressional subpoena that seeks financial records from the president's longtime accounting firm.
The new case in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit will mark the first time a federal appeals panel will weigh a House subpoena that demands Trump-related financial information. The president has vowed to resist congressional subpoenas seeking records and testimony from lawyers and other officials in his orbit.
U.S. District Judge Amit Mehta of the District of Columbia on Monday ruled Trump and his businesses have no lawful ground to block the House Oversight Committee subpoena that was served on the accounting firm Mazars USA LLP. Mazars, represented by a team from Blank Rome, has not taken a position on the demand for records.
“Courts have grappled for more than a century with the question of the scope of Congress's investigative power,” Mehta said in his ruling. “The binding principle that emerges from these judicial decisions is that courts must presume Congress is acting in furtherance of its constitutional responsibility to legislate and must defer to congressional judgments about what Congress needs to carry out that purpose.”
Trump's attorneys—he is represented by the firms Consovoy McCarthy Park and Michael Best & Friedrich—on Wednesday jointly filed court papers asking the D.C. Circuit to expedite the appeal. The proposed schedule would push the dispute into mid-July, and during that time the House would agree to suspend the production of documents that are required by the subpoena to Mazars.
“I was very encouraged earlier this week when the district court issued its strong ruling supporting Congress' right to conduct investigations, and I am encouraged that we have now been able to reach this agreement to seek an expedited appeal,” U.S. Rep. Elijah Cummings, chairman of the House Oversight Committee, said in a statement. “I hope the court approves our request so we can move forward and effectively discharge our responsibilities under the Constitution.”
The court filing said Mazars has agreed to continue “collecting and preparing responsive documents but not to produce any documents in response to the subpoena during that period.”
Trump's attorneys said they would file “emergency” court papers to freeze enforcement of Mehta's ruling if the D.C. Circuit does not agree to the proposed expedited schedule.
“The committee, through counsel for the House of Representatives, agrees to suspend the time for production set by the subpoena until that motion is decided and, if it is denied, until seven days thereafter,” according to Wednesday's court filing.
The litigation in the D.C. Circuit is unfolding amid a broader dispute between House Democrats and the White House related to ongoing investigations of Trump and his business empire, access to his tax returns, and access to an unredacted copy of the special counsel's investigation of Russia's interference in the 2016 presidential election.
Trump's lawyers had urged a New York federal court to block a subpoena that involves House Democrats' demands for information from Deutsche Bank and Capital One. U.S. District Judge Edgardo Ramos of the Southern District of New York, who heard arguments Wednesday afternoon, ruled against Trump. Ramos, like Mehta, also denied to stay enforcement of the subpoena pending Trump's appeal.
Democrats and other critics of the Trump administration are hopeful the federal courts will move quickly on the various subpoena fights. Mehta sped up his deliberation of the accounting firm subpoena, over objections made by Trump's legal team.
Both sides Wednesday asked the D.C. Circuit to hear oral arguments sometime after mid-July, which would mark a rare hearing for the court. The D.C. Circuit's argument cycle typically ends in May, and it resumes in the fall.
Wednesday's court filing in the D.C. Circuit was signed by Douglas Letter, the U.S. House general counsel; William Consovoy of Washington's Consovoy McCarthy, a lead attorney for Trump; and Jerry Bernstein of Blank Rome, a lawyer for Mazars.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllBankruptcy Filings Surged in First Half of 2024 Amid Uptick in Big Chapter 11 Cases
3 minute readTrump Financial Statements From 2011 to 2020 'Should No Longer Be Relied Upon,' Accountant's GC Says
Bonuses and Beyond: Law Firms Wrap Up Lucrative Year With Record-High Rewards
Trending Stories
- 1Where Do Web-Tracking Class Actions Belong? 8th Circuit Weighs the Issue
- 2While Data Breaches May Lead to Years of Legal Battles, Cyberattacks Can be Prevented
- 3The Definition of Special Employment
- 4People in the News—Nov. 21, 2024—Willig Williams, Hangley Aronchick
- 5Rawle & Henderson Hires New Del. Managing Partner
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250