Dori Bernstein Will Depart as Georgetown Law's Supreme Court Institute Director
Georgetown Law's Supreme Court Institute has become an almost essential go-to destination for the Supreme Court bar.
May 24, 2019 at 11:05 AM
5 minute read
Dori Bernstein, director of the influential Supreme Court Institute at Georgetown University Law Center, is stepping aside after nine years of organizing and participating in hundreds of moot courts for veteran and neophyte high court advocates alike.
Bernstein said she will continue at Georgetown teaching a clerkship practicum for law students and taking on other activities, but she is leaving her institute role to spend more time with her aging parents in Connecticut. Georgetown is seeking applicants for a new director.
“I really love the program, and the job was a blast, but the schedule is somewhat relentless when the court is in session,” she said in an interview. “I just need to be able to drive up to Hartford and hang out for a week or so, when I feel like it.”
In addition to moot courts, the institute, led by executive director Irv Gornstein and faculty director Steven Goldblatt, also puts on briefings and panel discussions about the Supreme Court and hosts what has been dubbed the annual end-of-term “prom party” for court practitioners.
The institute has become an almost essential go-to destination for the Supreme Court bar. For lawyers who learn that the court has just granted certiorari in their case, their first or second phone call is to the institute for first dibs on scheduling a moot court.
In the current term, the institute mooted lawyers for one side or the other in 70 of the 71 cases argued. It would have been 71, but one recalcitrant lawyer prefers his moot courts to take place in Chicago. Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg once said the institute is “a tremendous service to the court,” and other justices have said the same.
“Dori is largely responsible for the Georgetown Institute's central role in Supreme Court practice. It's hard to imagine doing a moot court at the Institute without Dori there,” said Paul Weiss partner Kannon Shanmugam, who mooted all four of the cases he argued this term at Georgetown.
Bernstein, who clerked for Ginsburg when she was a circuit court judge, was a litigator for the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission before coming to Georgetown.
“Dori is one of the best lawyers in Washington, period,” said Roy Englert Jr., partner at Robbins, Russell, Englert, Orseck, Untereiner & Sauber. “She is brilliant but always uses her brilliance to bring out the best in others, from the profession's youngest aspirants to its most accomplished practitioners.”
A highlight of her job, Bernstein said, was occupying “the front row seats to see the best legal talent in the country. I'd already spent my career as an appellate litigator, and I kept thinking, 'Wow, it would have been helpful if I did all these moots before I started arguing cases.'”
Without naming names, Bernstein added, “Oh my god, there are some [advocates] who are just astonishing.”
But the logistics of organizing moot courts and recruiting five lawyers to serve as “judges” for each one became something of a grind.
“Every year for at least the last three years we've gotten the court's February [argument] calendar on December 23rd or 24th,” Bernstein said. “And that means I would spend the next couple of weeks where the school is shut down and we're all supposed to have the time off, and I'm spending it trying to get ahold of everybody to get scheduled. It's like the clock is ticking.”
But Bernstein was not just an event planner. She sometimes recruited herself to be a moot court judge, and helped advocates in other ways.
“I remember her pulling me aside when I had a slew of back-to-back arguments and telling me I had to take better care of myself,” Hogan Lovells partner Neal Katyal said. “She was like this with every student and every advocate. And she was a phenomenal mooter and thinker. I would always request her for every single moot.”
Read more:
Garland Dishes SCOTUS Humor as DC Circuit Goes to School
Shanmugam Exits Williams & Connolly to Launch Paul Weiss Appeals Practice
Former SCOTUS Clerks Dominate the Ranks of Trump's Judicial Nominees
Mueller's Restraint, Barr's Press Conference: What Lawyers Are Saying
Bank-Robber-Turned-Law-Prof Lands a Starring Role in Criminal Justice Reform
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllDeluge of Trump-Leery Government Lawyers Join Job Market, Setting Up Free-for-All for Law Firm, In-House Openings
4 minute read'As I've Grown Older': John Morgan Looks Back at a Life in Law
The 'Biden Effect' on Senior Attorneys: Should I Stay or Should I Go?
9 minute read2024 GC Pay Report: Signing Bonuses Swell in Size as Companies Shy Away From Internal Hires
7 minute readTrending Stories
- 1ACC CLO Survey Waves Warning Flags for Boards
- 2States Accuse Trump of Thwarting Court's Funding Restoration Order
- 3Microsoft Becomes Latest Tech Company to Face Claims of Stealing Marketing Commissions From Influencers
- 4Coral Gables Attorney Busted for Stalking Lawyer
- 5Trump's DOJ Delays Releasing Jan. 6 FBI Agents List Under Consent Order
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250