Mueller Says His Report 'Speaks for Itself' in First Public Remarks
"It would be unfair to potentially accuse somebody of a crime when there could be no court resolution of the actual charge," Mueller said, speaking alone at a podium at Main Justice in Washington.
May 29, 2019 at 11:14 AM
5 minute read
Special Counsel Robert Mueller III, making his first public remarks on his two-year investigation of Russia's interference in the 2016 election, said Wednesday that charging a sitting president with a criminal violation was “not an option we could consider.”
“It would be unfair to potentially accuse somebody of a crime when there could be no court resolution of the actual charge,” Mueller said, speaking alone at a podium at Main Justice in Washington. “That was Justice Department policy. Those were the principles under which we operated. We would not reach a determination one way or the other whether the president committed a crime.”
He added: “We will not comment on any other conclusions or hypotheticals about the president.”
Mueller said he was “speaking out today because our investigation is complete. We are formally closing the special counsel's office.” Mueller declined to take questions from the throng of news reporters who had assembled in the room. He spoke for about 10 minutes.
Read Mueller's prepared remarks below:
Mueller's remarks came as U.S. House Democrats seek his testimony on the investigation he oversaw into ties between the Kremlin and the Trump campaign, along with the president's reported efforts to obstruct the probe.
U.S. Rep. Jerrold Nadler of New York, the top Democrat on the House Judiciary Committee, has said Mueller has expressed a willingness to testify before Congress but would prefer to speak behind closed doors to avoid a “political spectacle.”
Mueller expressed reluctance Wednesday to testifying, but said that any public remarks would not go beyond the report that his office prepared.
“I hope and expect this to be the only time that I will speak about this matter,” Mueller said. “I am making that decision myself—no one has told me whether I can or should testify to speak further about this matter.”
The special counsel's office found no evidence Trump's campaign coordinated with Russia's efforts to sow conflict into the presidential election.
On the question of whether Trump obstructed the probe, Mueller's team identified 10 instances of potentially obstructive acts committed by the president. Those acts included Trump's efforts to convince the White House counsel at the time, Donald McGahn, and other subordinates to fire Mueller, and Trump's removal of James Comey as the FBI director.
Still, Mueller's team did not make a final conclusion on whether Trump should be charged with obstruction of justice. “While this report does not conclude that the President committed a crime,” Mueller's team wrote, “it also does not exonerate him.” Mueller's report pointed to Justice Department policy that counsels against prosecutors bringing criminal charges against a sitting U.S. president.
“As set forth in our report, after that investigation, if we had confidence that the President clearly did not commit a crime, we would have said that,” Mueller said Wednesday.
U.S. Attorney General William Barr and his then-deputy, Rod Rosenstein, concluded the identified acts did not amount to obstruction of justice. That decision fueled criticism from former federal prosecutors, who argued in a widely shared blog post that Trump would have faced “multiple felony charges” were he not president.
Mueller's investigation resulted in several prosecutions of close allies of Trump, including his former campaign chairman, Paul Manafort, who was convicted on charges related to his lobbying work for the Russia-aligned government of Ukraine. Trump's former national security adviser, Michael Flynn, is awaiting sentencing in Washington on a charge of lying to federal agents. Several other Mueller-related prosecutions are pending, including a case against longtime Trump aide Roger Stone.
Mueller's 448-page report on the Russia investigation has become a wedge between the Justice Department and House Democrats, who've demanded access to the full, unredacted copy of the document. The Justice Department has offered to allow a select group of lawmakers and their staffs to review what Assistant Attorney General Stephen Boyd has described as “98.5 percent” of the report, with only grand jury-related information redacted. But Democrats have refused to back down.
Mueller, who left his partnership at Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr after being named special counsel in 2017, has not publicly announced his next steps. He said Wednesday he is returning to “private life” but did not say where.
Other members of his prosecution team have returned to earlier posts. Greg Andres returned to Davis Polk & Wardwell, and Andrew Weissmann has taken a post at New York University School of Law.
Read more:
'Multiple Felony Charges': Ex-Federal Prosecutors Call Out Trump's Conduct
Read the Letter: Mueller Complains Barr Caused 'Public Confusion'
'Stormy Weather Lies Ahead': What Lawyers Said About Barr's Obstruction Call
Mueller's Restraint, Barr's Press Conference: Here's What Lawyers Are Saying
William Barr Has Reached That Point Where House Dems Explore 'All of the Options'
Rachel Brand Was on Trump's Radar for Russia Probe, But Aide Resisted Inquiries
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Something Else Is Coming': DOGE Established, but With Limited Scope
Supreme Court Considers Reviving Lawsuit Over Fatal Traffic Stop Shooting
US DOJ Threatens to Prosecute Local Officials Who Don't Aid Immigration Enforcement
3 minute readUS Judge Cannon Blocks DOJ From Releasing Final Report in Trump Documents Probe
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 15th Circuit Considers Challenge to Louisiana's Ten Commandments Law
- 2Crocs Accused of Padding Revenue With Channel-Stuffing HEYDUDE Shoes
- 3E-discovery Practitioners Are Racing to Adapt to Social Media’s Evolving Landscape
- 4The Law Firm Disrupted: For Office Policies, Big Law Has Its Ear to the Market, Not to Trump
- 5FTC Finalizes Child Online Privacy Rule Updates, But Ferguson Eyes Further Changes
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250