Mueller Says His Report 'Speaks for Itself' in First Public Remarks
"It would be unfair to potentially accuse somebody of a crime when there could be no court resolution of the actual charge," Mueller said, speaking alone at a podium at Main Justice in Washington.
May 29, 2019 at 11:14 AM
5 minute read
Special Counsel Robert Mueller III, making his first public remarks on his two-year investigation of Russia's interference in the 2016 election, said Wednesday that charging a sitting president with a criminal violation was “not an option we could consider.”
“It would be unfair to potentially accuse somebody of a crime when there could be no court resolution of the actual charge,” Mueller said, speaking alone at a podium at Main Justice in Washington. “That was Justice Department policy. Those were the principles under which we operated. We would not reach a determination one way or the other whether the president committed a crime.”
He added: “We will not comment on any other conclusions or hypotheticals about the president.”
Mueller said he was “speaking out today because our investigation is complete. We are formally closing the special counsel's office.” Mueller declined to take questions from the throng of news reporters who had assembled in the room. He spoke for about 10 minutes.
Read Mueller's prepared remarks below:
Mueller's remarks came as U.S. House Democrats seek his testimony on the investigation he oversaw into ties between the Kremlin and the Trump campaign, along with the president's reported efforts to obstruct the probe.
U.S. Rep. Jerrold Nadler of New York, the top Democrat on the House Judiciary Committee, has said Mueller has expressed a willingness to testify before Congress but would prefer to speak behind closed doors to avoid a “political spectacle.”
Mueller expressed reluctance Wednesday to testifying, but said that any public remarks would not go beyond the report that his office prepared.
“I hope and expect this to be the only time that I will speak about this matter,” Mueller said. “I am making that decision myself—no one has told me whether I can or should testify to speak further about this matter.”
The special counsel's office found no evidence Trump's campaign coordinated with Russia's efforts to sow conflict into the presidential election.
On the question of whether Trump obstructed the probe, Mueller's team identified 10 instances of potentially obstructive acts committed by the president. Those acts included Trump's efforts to convince the White House counsel at the time, Donald McGahn, and other subordinates to fire Mueller, and Trump's removal of James Comey as the FBI director.
Still, Mueller's team did not make a final conclusion on whether Trump should be charged with obstruction of justice. “While this report does not conclude that the President committed a crime,” Mueller's team wrote, “it also does not exonerate him.” Mueller's report pointed to Justice Department policy that counsels against prosecutors bringing criminal charges against a sitting U.S. president.
“As set forth in our report, after that investigation, if we had confidence that the President clearly did not commit a crime, we would have said that,” Mueller said Wednesday.
U.S. Attorney General William Barr and his then-deputy, Rod Rosenstein, concluded the identified acts did not amount to obstruction of justice. That decision fueled criticism from former federal prosecutors, who argued in a widely shared blog post that Trump would have faced “multiple felony charges” were he not president.
Mueller's investigation resulted in several prosecutions of close allies of Trump, including his former campaign chairman, Paul Manafort, who was convicted on charges related to his lobbying work for the Russia-aligned government of Ukraine. Trump's former national security adviser, Michael Flynn, is awaiting sentencing in Washington on a charge of lying to federal agents. Several other Mueller-related prosecutions are pending, including a case against longtime Trump aide Roger Stone.
Mueller's 448-page report on the Russia investigation has become a wedge between the Justice Department and House Democrats, who've demanded access to the full, unredacted copy of the document. The Justice Department has offered to allow a select group of lawmakers and their staffs to review what Assistant Attorney General Stephen Boyd has described as “98.5 percent” of the report, with only grand jury-related information redacted. But Democrats have refused to back down.
Mueller, who left his partnership at Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr after being named special counsel in 2017, has not publicly announced his next steps. He said Wednesday he is returning to “private life” but did not say where.
Other members of his prosecution team have returned to earlier posts. Greg Andres returned to Davis Polk & Wardwell, and Andrew Weissmann has taken a post at New York University School of Law.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllRead the Document: 'Google Must Divest Chrome,' DOJ Says, Proposing Remedies in Search Monopoly Case
3 minute readAmir Ali, MacArthur Justice Center Director, Confirmed to DC District Court
Health Care Giants Sue FTC, Allege Lina Khan Using Loaded Process to Vilify Pharmacy Benefit Managers
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Womans Suit Alleging Negligence to Sex Trafficking by Hotel Tossed by Federal Judge
- 2Dog Gone It, Target: Provider of Retailer's Mascot Dog Sues Over Contract Cancellation
- 3Lululemon Faces Legal Fire Over Its DEI Program After Bias Complaints Surface
- 4Plaintiff Gets $500K Policy Limit Without Surgery
- 5Philadelphia Bar Association Executive Director Announces Retirement
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250