General Litigation Winner: O'Melveny & Myers
O'Melveny & Myers once again proved its mettle as a litigation machine in 2018, as the firm scored clean wins for top-billing clients in cases…
May 30, 2019 at 11:59 PM
4 minute read
O'Melveny & Myers once again proved its mettle as a litigation machine in 2018, as the firm scored clean wins for top-billing clients in cases that could shape the business industry.
One of those victories came through the firm's representation of AT&T Inc. and Time Warner, who became mired in a major legal battle with the federal government in November 2017, when the Justice Department brought a historic challenge to their $85 billion merger. It was the first time the government had sought to block a vertical merger in decades, and many had questioned whether President Donald Trump's well-documented dislike for CNN, Time Warner's signature news brand, had motivated the lawsuit.
But the two companies brought on O'Melveny partner Daniel Petrocelli to lead the pack of lawyers and firms defending the deal in a grueling six-week trial in Washington. "I learned a long time ago to put blinders on, and to stay focused," Petrocelli said, describing the legal issues in the case as "straightforward." That was a lesson that proved crucial to O'Melveny's big win. U.S. District Judge Richard Leon cleared the merger in June 2018, and the D.C. Circuit later affirmed the ruling, blessing a deal that's reshaped the media industry.
But O'Melveny notched another big win last year, this time for client Samsung Electronics, as it fought allegations in years of intense multidistrict litigation that it was involved in a conspiracy to fix prices for optical disk drives. Partner Ian Simmons, who co-chairs the firm's antitrust and competition practice, led the team that represented the electronics conglomerate and said his team of partners and associates "outworked and out-thought" the opposition to achieve dismissal in the case. "The theory is they colluded to have x be the result. Let's see if X actually happened," Simmons said of the firm's central argument in the case. "That's what we did. We showed the judge, we didn't just tell him."
Even while other disk-making companies involved in the case had previously settled for tens of millions of dollars and agreed to guilty pleas with the Justice Department, U.S. District Judge Richard Seeborg of the Northern District of California, agreed to dismiss the claims against Samsung Electronics. In the end, O'Melveny helped Samsung fend off antitrust claims seeking $1 billion in actual damages and $3 billion in treble damages.
Simmons said the case highlighted the importance of facts, good lawyering, and a fair-minded judge. In August 2018, Samsung and Toshiba, another defendant in the case, agreed to pay $25 million to end the allegations against them, and compensate the class of indirect purchasers suing them and cover their legal costs and fees.
Firm Facts:
Name of Firm | O'Melveny & Myers |
Founded | 1885 |
Total number of attorneys | 705 |
Litigators as percentage of firm | 68% |
Litigators as percentage in D.C. | 95% |
Litigation partners firmwide | 126 |
Litigation associates firmwide | 316 |
D.C. litigation partners | 24 |
D.C. litigation associates | 49 |
Keys to Success: "Avoid distractions and any external influences in your case, and keep your eye on the prize, look straight ahead and stay focused for your client." — Daniel Petrocelli
"Clients can often be stigmatized; great lawyers are able to overcome bad optics." — Ian Simmons
Ellis Kim, based in Washington, D.C., covers the federal judiciary, D.C. courts and national litigation trends. Follow her weekly newsletter, Trump Watch. Contact her at [email protected], or on Twitter: @elliskkim.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllThree Akin Sports Lawyers Jump to Employment Firm Littler Mendelson
Brownstein Adds Former Interior Secretary, Offering 'Strategic Counsel' During New Trump Term
2 minute readWeil, Loading Up on More Regulatory Talent, Adds SEC Asset Management Co-Chief
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Critical Mass With Law.com’s Amanda Bronstad: LA Judge Orders Edison to Preserve Wildfire Evidence, Is Kline & Specter Fight With Thomas Bosworth Finally Over?
- 2What Businesses Need to Know About Anticipated FTC Leadership Changes
- 3Federal Court Considers Blurry Lines Between Artist's Consultant and Business Manager
- 4US Judge Cannon Blocks DOJ From Releasing Final Report in Trump Documents Probe
- 5White & Case KOs Claims Against Voltage Inc. in Solar Companies' Trade Dispute
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.