2 Whistleblowers, Represented by Motley Rice, Split $3 Million Award From SEC
The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission has awarded about $3 million to a pair of whistleblowers who jointly alerted the agency to misconduct harming retail investors and assisted with an investigation that resulted in a successful enforcement action.
June 03, 2019 at 03:19 PM
3 minute read
The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission has awarded about $3 million to a pair of whistleblowers who jointly alerted the agency to misconduct harming retail investors and assisted with an investigation that resulted in a successful enforcement action.
Announcing the settlement Monday, the SEC hailed the whistleblowers' efforts to first report the misconduct internally, crediting them for promptly participating in their employer's compliance system and also for suffering “hardships by raising concerns about the violation.”
The SEC also praised the tipsters for meeting with the agency's staff in-person and identifying potential witnesses.
The award will be split evenly between the two tipsters.
“These whistleblowers showed great tenacity by repeatedly reporting internally and advocating for the firm to disclose the violative conduct and remedy the attendant investor harm,” said Jane Norberg, chief of the SEC's whistleblower office. “Their critical information and assistance helped the SEC bring an important enforcement action aimed at protecting retail investors.”
The SEC, following its policy, did not identify the whistleblowers or the enforcement action that gave rise to the award. The whistleblowers were represented by Rebecca Katz, a New York City-based senior counsel at Motley Rice, who previously served as a senior counsel in the SEC's enforcement division. Katz declined to identify the enforcement action or her clients, saying they wanted “complete confidentiality.”
The trumpeting of the whistleblowers' internal reporting comes at a time of increased risk for employees who decide, at least initially, to report misconduct only within their companies.
Last year, the Supreme Court ruled that the Dodd-Frank Act's robust protections against workplace retaliation extend only to whistleblowers who report misconduct to federal regulators. The court's unanimous decision, in Digital Realty Trust v. Somers, effectively struck down the SEC's view that Dodd-Frank's anti-retaliation protections extended even to whistleblowers who only reported internally.
Since that ruling, Norberg and former SEC officials have sought to raise awareness of the need for whistleblowers to contact the commission directly in order to tap into Dodd-Frank's anti-retaliation protections. Norberg said last year, just months after the Digital Realty decision, that whistleblowers would be “rolling the dice” if they wait to report misconduct to the commission.
“I think that the ruling is very clear: Whistleblowers who want to preserve their rights under the Dodd-Frank anti-retaliation provisions must report to the commission. Full stop. And we need to get those reports before the retaliation occurs,” Norberg said in June 2018. “In my opinion, whistleblowers will be rolling the dice not to report to the commission either at the same time or before reporting internally if they want the more robust protections under the Dodd-Frank statute.”
Last month, the SEC referenced the Digital Realty decision in an announcement of a more than $4.5 million award to a whistleblower whose internal report prompted his company to investigate allegations of foreign bribery and disclose the misconduct to the government. That whistleblower had also contacted the SEC.
The SEC did not include a similar reference to the Digital Realty decision in the announcement of the latest award. With the $3 million awarded Monday, the SEC has now issued more than $384 million in bounties to a total of 64 whistleblowers.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLaw Firms Expand Scope of Immigration Expertise Amid Blitz of Trump Orders
6 minute readAm Law 100 Lateral Partner Hiring Rose in 2024: Report
Trending Stories
- 1Uber Files RICO Suit Against Plaintiff-Side Firms Alleging Fraudulent Injury Claims
- 2The Law Firm Disrupted: Scrutinizing the Elephant More Than the Mouse
- 3Inherent Diminished Value Damages Unavailable to 3rd-Party Claimants, Court Says
- 4Pa. Defense Firm Sued by Client Over Ex-Eagles Player's $43.5M Med Mal Win
- 5Losses Mount at Morris Manning, but Departing Ex-Chair Stays Bullish About His Old Firm's Future
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250