Clarence Thomas Praises High Level of Supreme Court Advocacy
"If there is a .400 hitter, you will go with someone who will increase your odds," the justice said Monday.
June 03, 2019 at 05:11 PM
3 minute read
Supreme Court advocacy has vastly improved in recent years, Justice Clarence Thomas said Monday, and he doesn't blame clients for hiring top-tier lawyers to argue their cases.
“If there is a .400 hitter, you will go with someone who will increase your odds,” Thomas said at the court in a conversation with philanthropist David Rubenstein. The event was part of the annual meeting of the Supreme Court Historical Society, and Rubenstein is a trustee.
Thomas, who joined the court in 1991, recalled that early in his tenure, there were “local attorneys” who were not up to the task of arguing before the court. But now, he said, “I don't see too many lawyers being overmatched.” He also praised the proliferation of state solicitors general as a “great” improvement over earlier years, when unpolished state attorneys general fumbled their way through arguments.
Rubenstein also asked the perennial question about Thomas's practice of rarely asking questions at oral argument.
The justice said he prefers to give “more opportunity for the lawyers to talk” rather than engaging them in dialogue. “I don't learn by the back and forth,” Thomas said, noting that “I taught myself algebra one summer.”
By asking too many questions, Thomas added, “the risk is that you monopolize or freeze out the time” allotted to the lawyers.
Thomas brushed off recent rumors that he might retire soon. “I have no idea where this stuff comes from,” he said. While he didn't explicitly say he would not retire, he did deny the rumors at a Pepperdine University School of Law event in April.
Thomas said he still loves the court as a “human institution” that is collegial and friendly, “a wonderful place.” He added dryly, “I don't really have a lot of stress. I cause stress.”
Asked for his views on allowing camera coverage of the Supreme Court, Thomas shrugged that it is “almost inevitable,” but he is not a fan. “When a camera is produced, it changes the proceeding.”
Returning to his theme about how inaccuracies circulate in Washington, Thomas said he recently learned that the display that features him at the National Museum of African American History and Culture contains inaccuracies about his views on affirmative action. Thomas said he hasn't seen the display for himself.
Rubenstein was the right person for Thomas to tell that anecdote to. “As chairman of the Smithsonian,” Rubenstein said, “we'll fix that.” The museum, which opened in 2016, is part of the Smithsonian Institution. Rubenstein is chair of the institution's board of regents, and Chief Justice John Roberts Jr. is chancellor.
Read more:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllGovernment Attorneys Are Flooding the Job Market, But Is There Room in Big Law?
4 minute readWill Khan Resign? FTC Chair Isn't Saying Whether She'll Stick Around After Giving Up Gavel
'Almost Impossible'?: Squire Challenge to Sanctions Spotlights Difficulty of Getting Off Administration's List
4 minute readDC Judge Rules Russia Not Immune in Ukrainian Arbitration Award Dispute
2 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Volunteers Unreimbursed Expenses — Tax Incentives For Itemizers
- 2Carter Mario Achieves $225,000 Settlement in Motor Vehicle Case
- 3Legal Departments Gripe About Outside Counsel but Rarely Talk to Them
- 4'Further Investment in Power' Will Drive Big Law Business—But What About Clean Energy Projects?
- 5SEC Penalizes Wells Fargo, LPL Financial $900,000 Each for Inaccurate Trading Data
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250