Arnold & Porter's Amy Jeffress Will Be Defense Witness for Gregory Craig
Craig's defense lawyers said Jeffress, a veteran former federal prosecutor, will back Craig's contention he did not need to register his Ukraine work under the Foreign Agents Registration Act.
June 10, 2019 at 07:07 PM
5 minute read
A prominent white-collar defender at Arnold & Porter is expected to testify in support of Gregory Craig, the former Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom partner in Washington who is charged with making false statements about the scope of his work for Ukraine, according to new court filings.
Craig's defense lawyers said late Monday they plan to call Arnold & Porter's Amy Jeffress, a longtime former federal prosecutor, as a trial witness to support their client. Craig was accused in April of concealing information about his work on a report prepared in 2012 for the Russia-aligned government of Ukraine about the prosecution of former prime minister Yulia Tymoshenko.
Federal prosecutors contend Craig, then a Skadden partner, was required to disclose his Ukraine advocacy under the Foreign Agents Registration Act, or FARA, a database maintained by the U.S. Department of Justice that reveals certain services that law firms and lobbyists are performing for foreign government clients. Craig, represented by a team from Zuckerman Spaeder, has denied he misled the Justice Department about the nature of his work.
In their filing Monday, Craig's lawyers said Jeffress, a white-collar and national security partner who joined Arnold & Porter in 2014, would “opine that it would have been reasonable for a knowledgeable practitioner in the field in or around 2012 and 2013″ to believe they did not need to register under FARA for preparing a purportedly independent report “regardless of how the foreign entity intended to use the report or did in fact use it.”
Craig's lawyers said in their filing: “Ms. Jeffress will further opine that it would have been reasonable for a knowledgeable practitioner to believe that providing a copy of the report to a few media outlets and speaking about the conclusions contained in it, in order to ensure that those conclusions were accurately reported in the U.S. media, would not require registration as long as those contacts were not made under the direction and control of the foreign principal, even if the client had an interest in the report's getting public attention.”
Prosecutors said in charging documents that the “purpose of FARA is to prevent covert influence by foreign principals. Proper registration under the statute allows the U.S. government and the American people to evaluate the statements and activities of individuals who are serving as agents of foreign principals.”
Amy Jeffress. Photo: Diego M. Radzinschi/The National Law JournalJeffress formerly served as chief of the national security section of the United States Attorney's Office for the District of Columbia from 2007 to 2009. During that time, Craig's lawyers said, Jeffress “supervised that office's investigations and prosecutions related to FARA, and her knowledge of how the FARA Unit performed its functions.” Jeffress also previously served as the Justice Department's legal attache to the U.S. embassy in London.
Jeffress is the designated FARA adviser for Arnold & Porter, and her name appears on various filings in the FARA database, including a disclosure in February that said the firm was working on behalf of Venezuelan opposition leader Juan Guaidó.
“She will base her opinions on her knowledge gained as a FARA practitioner who often advises clients (including lawyers and law firms, consulting firms, and some foreign companies) on their registration obligations under FARA,” Craig's defense lawyers, including Zuckerman Spaeder's William Taylor III, said in their filing.
Skadden, after reaching a civil settlement with the Justice Department in January, belatedly registered its advocacy for Ukraine. The government's scrutiny of Skadden flowed in part from the special counsel's investigation of Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election. Craig, who joined Skadden in 2010, departed the firm last year.
Prosecutors said Monday they do not intend to call expert witnesses at trial, which is scheduled for August.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllEx-Deputy AG Trusts U.S. Legal System To Pull Country Through Times of Duress
7 minute read'Even Playing Field?' Wiley Rein Intervenes in Federal Election Campaign Spending Row
3 minute readBig Law Lawyers Fan Out for Election Day Volunteering in Call Centers and Litigation
7 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250