READ: DOJ Memo Defends Trump's Refusal to Release Tax Returns
Steven Engel, head of DOJ's Office of Legal Counsel, said Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin "quite reasonably, concluded that Chairman [Richard] Neal had not articulated the real reason for his request."
June 14, 2019 at 05:50 PM
5 minute read
The U.S. Treasury Department is acting lawfully in refusing to provide President Donald Trump's tax returns to House Democrats despite a federal law that says the government “shall furnish” any requested information about a private citizen, the Justice Department said in a new legal memo published Friday.
Federal law has long permitted the U.S. House Ways and Means Committee to inspect the tax returns of private individuals, and the law does not require congressional lawmakers to state a reason for wanting to review a citizen's tax records. But the Justice Department is arguing that Democrats have offered “pretextual” reasons for wanting to see Trump's records and that the Treasury secretary was not out of bounds to “close his eyes and blindly accept a pretextual justification for that request.”
“Congress could not constitutionally confer upon the committee the right to compel disclosure by the executive branch of confidential information that did not serve a legitimate legislative purpose,” the DOJ's Office of Legal Counsel memo stated. “While the executive branch should accord due deference and respect to congressional requests, Treasury was not obliged to accept the committee's stated purpose without question, and based on all the facts and circumstances.”
Representatives from the House Ways and Means Committee did not immediately comment Friday about the DOJ legal memo.
The Treasury Department's refusal to provide Trump's tax returns marks the latest clash between the administration and House Democrats and could spur a new legal fight in Washington's federal trial court. Trump's lawyers already are fighting in two federal appeals courts now to block House committees from obtaining financial records from his accounting firm and two banks. Judges in Washington and New York have upheld subpoenas issued to financial institutions in Trump's orbit.
House Ways and Means Chairman Richard Neal, D-Massachusetts, first requested Trump's tax returns in April from Charles Rettig, the Internal Revenue Service commissioner.
“Consistent with its authority, the committee is considering legislative proposals and conducting oversight related to our federal tax laws, including, but not limited to, the extent to which the IRS audits and enforces federal tax laws against a president,” Neal wrote.
The Justice Department's memo, written by Steven Engel, the Senate-confirmed head of the Office of Legal Counsel, declared: “No one could reasonably believe that the committee seeks six years of President Trump's tax returns because of a newly discovered interest in legislating on the presidential-audit process.”
Engel said Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin “quite reasonably, concluded that Chairman Neal had not articulated the real reason for his request. The chairman's request that Treasury turn over the president's tax returns, for the apparent purpose of making them public, amounted to an unprecedented use of the committee's authority and raised a serious risk of abuse.”
The Justice Department's new legal memo memorializes advice given to the U.S. Treasury Department, which had resisted, for weeks, disclosing the requested tax records of Trump and related business entities.
Mnuchin last month said in a letter to Congress that the Justice Department was preparing a legal memo on the dispute.
“In reliance on the advice of the Department of Justice, I have determined that the committee's request lacks a legitimate legislative purpose, and pursuant to section 6103, the department is therefore not authorized to disclose the requested returns and return information,” Mnuchin wrote in his letter on May 6.
Mnuchin said in his letter that the Ways and Means committee's request “is unprecedented, and it presents serious constitutional questions, the resolution of which may have lasting consequences for all taxpayers.”
Trump had vowed for months on the campaign trail that he wanted to release his tax returns but was facing an IRS audit. Tax professional said then that any pending audit would not have precluded Trump from releasing his returns, as presidential candidates have done for decades.
“I'm always audited by the IRS—which I think is very unfair,” Trump said after one Republican presidential debate. “I don't maybe because of religion or something else.” He added: I'm a strong Christian and I feel strongly about it—and maybe there's a bias. You have many religious groups that are complaining about that.”
The new OLC memo is posted below:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllGovernment Attorneys Are Flooding the Job Market, But Is There Room in Big Law?
4 minute readWill Khan Resign? FTC Chair Isn't Saying Whether She'll Stick Around After Giving Up Gavel
'Almost Impossible'?: Squire Challenge to Sanctions Spotlights Difficulty of Getting Off Administration's List
4 minute readDC Judge Rules Russia Not Immune in Ukrainian Arbitration Award Dispute
2 minute readTrending Stories
- 1GC With Deep GM Experience Takes Legal Reins of Power Management Giant
- 2Atlanta Attorneys Rely on Google Earth, YouTube for Evidence in $6M Faulty Guardrail Settlement
- 3Feds Chide Defense Attorney Alex Spiro for Extrajudicial Comments in NYC's Adams Case
- 4These Law Firm Leaders Are Optimistic About 2025, Citing Deal Pipeline, International Business
- 5‘A Force of Nature’: Littler Mendelson Shareholder Michael Lotito Dies At 76
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250