Trump's 'Character and Fitness' Is Questioned in Hotel Liquor-License Case
"The board correctly rejected Trump's attempt to silence the public and to be held above the law," said a lawyer for the residents who are opposing the renewal of the license at Trump's hotel in downtown D.C.
June 14, 2019 at 03:00 PM
4 minute read
Lawyers representing President Donald Trump's hotel in downtown Washington this week lost their bid to dismiss claims from a group of District of Columbia residents, including a retired federal judge, that Trump's alleged poor character and fitness should bar the renewal of the venue's city liquor license.
The hotel's lawyers had argued the D.C. residents should not be allowed to question the character of Trump as only one of the names appearing on the alcohol license on his hotel just blocks from the White House. Five members of the Alcoholic Beverage Control Board rejected the argument in an order dated June 12.
“The board has consistently held that 'the mere creation of a corporate entity does not shield the individuals holding an interest in a corporation or limited liability company from having their records as owners scrutinized by the board,'” the panel said in its order, quoting from an earlier board decision.
Character and fitness is one of the requirements a liquor-license holder must show before the board grants any renewal. The D.C. residents, including Henry Kennedy, who retired from the federal bench in 2011 after 14 years of service there, contend Trump lacks good character. They base their allegations on various Trump statements and his behavior, which they argue negatively affects peace, order and pedestrian safety.
“The ruling is a victory for the rule of law. The board correctly rejected Trump's attempt to silence the public and to be held above the law,” Joshua Levy, a lawyer for the license protesters, said in a statement Friday. “In the District, no one is above the law.”
Levy, a partner at Washington's Cunningham Levy Muse, formerly was a counsel to the U.S. Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Government Affairs. He practiced for more than a decade in the litigation and white-collar groups at Arnold & Porter and Stein Mitchell Beato & Missner, the firm from which Pat Cipollone departed last year to serve as Trump's White House counsel.
Stephen O'Brien, a commercial litigator and partner at Washington's Mallios & O'Brien who represented the Trump hotel, was not reached for comment Friday. O'Brien is also of counsel at Odin Feldman Pittleman in Fairfax, Virginia.
In his motion to dismiss, O'Brien had argued the “general public is not empowered to participate in litigation before the board on the character issue. If it were otherwise, every license application, new or renewal, easily could disintegrate into a popularity contest.”
Alan Garten, general counsel to the Trump Organization, told ABC News last year that the challenge to the hotel's liquor license “is not about the neighborhood, not about the common good and certainly not about the law. This is politics at its worst and an obvious effort to misuse the power of government to advance a political agenda.”
The Alcohol Beverage Control Board stressed that its decision was procedural and not a determination on the merits of the dispute. Lawyers for the hotel will still be allowed to contest whether the residents have standing to press their opposition to the renewal of the liquor license.
Trump's hotel in Washington, where administration officials occasionally dine, and where foreign leaders sometimes rent rooms, is the centerpiece of ongoing litigation about conflicts of interest lodged against the president. Several cases contend Trump is violating the Constitution's ban on accepting gifts or payments from foreign states. One of Kennedy's former colleagues on the trial bench, Emmet Sullivan, last month refused to dismiss a suit brought by 200 Democratic lawmakers.
The D.C. alcohol board's order is posted below:
Read more:
2 Amicus Briefs Played Big Roles in Latest 'Emoluments' Ruling Against Trump
Trump's Morgan Lewis Tax Lawyer Faces U.S. House Scrutiny
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllHigh Court Rejects 'Heightened' Standard for Employers Defending FLSA Cases
3rd Circuit Strikes Down NLRB’s Monetary Remedies for Fired Starbucks Workers
K&L Gates Secures $10.5M Verdict for Washington Meat Retailer in Lawsuit Over 'Boneless' Chicken Product
Frozen-Potato Producers Face Profiteering Allegations in Surge of Antitrust Class Actions
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1'Astronomical' Interest Rates: $1B Settlement to Resolve Allegations of 'Predatory' Lending Cancels $534M in Small-Business Debts
- 2Senator Plans to Reintroduce Bill to Split 9th Circuit
- 3Law Firms Converge to Defend HIPAA Regulation
- 4Judge Denies Retrial Bid by Ex-U.S. Sen. Menendez Over Evidentiary Error
- 5Lawyers: Meet Your New Partner
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250