Hogan Lovells Partner Cate Stetson Takes Banner 'Serial' Case to SCOTUS
"This case presents an important question of federal law on which state and federal courts are now divided," Stetson, co-leader of the firm's Supreme Court practice, told the justices. A petition is expected in the coming weeks at the high court.
June 19, 2019 at 11:14 AM
5 minute read
Catherine Stetson of Hogan Lovells. Credit: Diego M. Radzinschi/ ALM
A team from Hogan Lovells in Washington is preparing to file a petition at the U.S. Supreme Court that will urge the justices to confront the high-profile murder conviction of the Maryland man who was at the center of the podcast “Serial.”
Adnan Syed's case garnered substantial attention from the podcast, which chronicled—and questioned—the charge that Syed killed his high school ex-girlfriend.
The Hogan Lovells team, led by Catherine Stetson, a partner in Washington and co-leader of the firm's Supreme Court practice, told the justices in a filing on Monday that the petition in Syed's case would be forthcoming. She asked for a 30-day extension so she could submit the petition by Aug. 19.
Chief Justice John Roberts Jr. on Tuesday granted the routine request. As the circuit justice for the Fourth Circuit, Roberts handles such applications arising from cases in Maryland. Earlier in his career, Roberts was a partner at Hogan Lovells.
Syed won a new trial after the 2014 podcast aired, but the Maryland Court of Appeals in March overturned a lower court and reinstated the conviction by a 4-3 vote. Stetson argued on Syed's behalf before the Maryland high court in November 2018.
Then, as now, Syed's primary claim is that his first trial lawyer gave ineffective assistance that was prejudicial by failing to contact a possible alibi witness.
“This case presents an important question of federal law on which state and federal courts are now divided: whether trial counsel's failure to investigate a credible, non-cumulative, and independent alibi witness is prejudicial under Strickland v. Washington,” Stetson told the Supreme Court in her application for an extension, which is the first and only document alerting the court that the petition will be filed.
Stetson also said there is a split among federal and state courts on the issue, asserting that many courts have ruled that failing to contact a key alibi witness is prejudicial and deprives a defendant of a fair trial. The Maryland appeals court said in March that “given the totality of the evidence the jury heard, we conclude that there is not a significant or substantial possibility that the verdict would have been different” had Syed's trial lawyer presented an alibi witness.
![John Roberts](https://images.law.com/contrib/content/uploads/sites/398/2018/10/Gorsuch-Investiture-Article-201810301556.jpg)
The Hogan Lovells pro bono team, working with defense lawyer C. Justin Brown of Baltimore's Brown Law, includes senior associates James Clayton, Kathryn Ali, W. David Maxwell and Katie Wellington, who clerked for Roberts during the 2015-2016 term. Earlier, Wellington clerked for then-Judge Brett Kavanaugh on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit. Kavanaugh is now a Supreme Court justice.
When Hogan Lovells first became co-counsel with Brown for Syed in 2016, the firm's pro bono partner, T. Clark Weymouth, said in a statement, “We are happy to assist Mr. Brown in his defense of Adnan Syed. It's no secret that many of those subjected to our criminal justice system lack the resources to mount an effective defense. Where, as here, the system fails, the private bar must help to protect the accused's right to a fair trial.”
The statement also noted that “the defense of Mr. Syed is the latest addition to Hogan Lovells' long list of pro bono representations of those who have been wrongly incarcerated.”
Brown, the criminal defense lawyer who'd long represented Syed, said he approached the firm about serving as co-counsel. Brown told the NLJ in 2016 that Syed's case has “gotten to the point where it's so complicated and it demands so many resources. It's hugely advantageous to the client to bring in support and firepower and brilliant lawyers.”
Stetson co-leads the Hogan Lovells' appellate team with Neal Katyal, the former Obama-era acting U.S. solicitor general. Stetson arrived at the the firm, then known as Hogan & Hartson, in 1997 as an associate. In 2005, Stetson testified in support of the confirmation of Roberts, her former colleague at the firm, to the Supreme Court.
“I grew up as a lawyer on Judge [John] Roberts' watch,” Stetson told the Senate Judiciary Committee. “It was my six years working for him at Hogan & Hartson, first as his associate, and later his law partner, that taught me how to be an advocate and a lawyer. And what a teacher to have.”
Read more:
Leading the SCOTUS Travel Ban Showdown
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All!['Erroneous Rulings'?: Wilmer Asks 4th Circuit to Overturn Mosby's Criminal Convictions 'Erroneous Rulings'?: Wilmer Asks 4th Circuit to Overturn Mosby's Criminal Convictions](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://images.law.com/nationallawjournal/contrib/content/uploads/sites/398/2021/08/Fourth-Circuit-Court-of-Appeals-767x633.jpg)
'Erroneous Rulings'?: Wilmer Asks 4th Circuit to Overturn Mosby's Criminal Convictions
3 minute read![DC Circuit Rejects Jan. 6 Defendants’ Claim That Pepper Spray Isn't Dangerous Weapon DC Circuit Rejects Jan. 6 Defendants’ Claim That Pepper Spray Isn't Dangerous Weapon](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://images.law.com/nationallawjournal/contrib/content/uploads/sites/398/2021/11/US-District-Courthouse-Washington-02-767x633.jpg)
DC Circuit Rejects Jan. 6 Defendants’ Claim That Pepper Spray Isn't Dangerous Weapon
![Supreme Court May Limit Federal Prosecutions Over 'Misleading' but True Statements Supreme Court May Limit Federal Prosecutions Over 'Misleading' but True Statements](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://k2-prod-alm.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/brightspot/c8/77/f124cba543fa8136c4921935f5c2/federal-deposit-insurance-corporation-building-1-767x633.jpg)
Supreme Court May Limit Federal Prosecutions Over 'Misleading' but True Statements
![US Judge OKs Partial Release of Ex-Special Counsel's Final Report in Election Case US Judge OKs Partial Release of Ex-Special Counsel's Final Report in Election Case](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://images.law.com/nationallawjournal/contrib/content/uploads/sites/292/2024/10/Trump-Cannon-767x633.jpg)
US Judge OKs Partial Release of Ex-Special Counsel's Final Report in Election Case
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Special Section: 2025 Real Estate Trends
- 2Snap Paid $63M in Fees to 2 Am Law 200 Firms in '24
- 3Lawyers Across Political Spectrum Launch Public Interest Team to Litigate Against Antisemitism
- 4Jones Day Names New Practice Leaders for Antitrust, Business and Tort Litigation and Latin America
- 5Russia’s Legal Sector Is Changing As Sanctions Take Their Toll
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250