Arnold & Porter Snags SCOTUS Veteran John Elwood From Vinson & Elkins
Elwood, succeeding Lisa Blatt, who jumped to Williams & Connolly, said he foresees growing Arnold & Porter's appellate practice.
June 24, 2019 at 07:31 AM
5 minute read
John Elwood, a former law clerk to Justice Anthony Kennedy and an alum of the U.S. solicitor general's office, will head Arnold & Porter's appellate and Supreme Court practice, continuing a “musical chairs” shuffle at the top echelons of the Supreme Court bar.
Known for his rare ability to make analysis of the Supreme Court fun to read, Elwood replaces Lisa Blatt, who left to head Williams & Connolly's Supreme Court and appellate practice in February. She succeeded Kannon Shanmugam, who went to Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison to launch its Supreme Court and appellate team.
Elwood has argued nine cases at the Supreme Court, five while at the solicitor general's office and four at Vinson & Elkins, where he had worked for the past 10 years. Before that, Elwood was a senior deputy in the Office of Legal Counsel at the Justice Department.
In an interview on Friday, Elwood said he decided to join Arnold & Porter in part because it is “a much bigger platform” that emphasizes litigation.
Another attraction, Elwood said, was that two of his Vinson & Elkins colleagues, Craig Margolis and Tirzah Lollar, moved to Arnold & Porter recently. They, like Elwood, specialize in False Claims Act litigation. But Elwood said the firm has “a very broad range of litigation, and they also do a ton of pro bono, so I think there will be a lot of opportunities to argue across the full range.”
Elwood said he foresees growing Arnold & Porter's appellate practice beyond its current numbers. “There's a lot of value in having an appellate practice” embedded with a trial team, he said. During Blatt's 10-year tenure at the firm, the practice won seven Supreme Court cases.
In a statement, Arnold & Porter chair Richard Alexander said, “John is a highly respected appellate and Supreme Court advocate whom clients trust to handle their most challenging and complex issues. His extensive experience, coupled with his record of leadership, makes him the ideal person to lead our top-tier appellate team.”
Apart from his Supreme Court arguments and his tweets, Elwood's visibility includes his intensely obscure “Relist Watch” feature that he writes for SCOTUSblog. He tracks when the court “relists” a pending petition for consideration at its next private conference, an action that can signal when and whether the case will be granted certiorari.
To make the feature lively, Elwood sprinkles throughout the report what he recently described as “especially funny jokes, dank memes and hilarious GIFs. In fact, they are so good that there's a danger that, if people could just read everything, unrestrained mirth would disrupt the workplace.”
That, plus a now-defunct annual review of the court's actions that he used to write for Green Bag, has earned Elwood the title of “The Dave Barry of Supreme Court humor.” In a prescient review of the 2011 term of the court, Elwood wrote, referring to Justice Clarence Thomas' concurrence in the Second Amendment case McDonald v. Chicago: “Justice Thomas seized the opportunity to advocate overruling the Slaughterhouse Cases and United States v. Cruikshank —the last two empty spaces on his 'Overrule 'em All!' punchcard. Having finally completed the set, he won a toaster.”
Elwood said on Friday the Dave Barry moniker still works. “There's a pretty small field of Supreme Court humorists. A little bit of humor makes the medicine go down better.”
Until recently, Elwood was also active at the University of Virginia School of Law Supreme Court litigation clinic. But since his wife, Courtney Elwood, became general counsel of the Central Intelligence Agency in June 2017, it has been difficult for him to travel frequently to Charlottesville.
“There is a requirement, under the ABA rules, that you can only do so many things long distance. And as long as my wife is at the CIA, it kind of impairs my ability to go down and do the lessons,” he said.
At Vinson & Elkins, Elwood displayed some of his collection of Gibson guitars and would occasionally take one down to play, to relieve stress. He said he won't likely bring his guitars to Arnold & Porter, however. “The interior walls are glass, so they may have inferior soundproofing,” he said.
But Elwood was pleased to learn that several of his new colleagues at Arnold & Porter play musical instruments. “Stanton Jones plays both guitar and mandolin, just like I do,” Elwood said, “There's a trumpeter and a cellist, too. They'll show me up as a hack, but I'm planning on getting a fake arm cast so no one ever expects me to play.”
Read more:
Talking SCOTUS With Kannon Shanmugam. What to Watch as Term Wraps Up
A Mayer Brown Supreme Court Duo Leaps to McDermott
Blatt Rejoins Williams & Connolly, This Time as Supreme Court Practice Head
Shanmugam Exits Williams & Connolly to Launch Paul Weiss Appeals Practice
About That Furniture CIA Lawyer Courtney Elwood Retained From Kellogg Hansen
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllIs 1st Circuit the New Center for Trump Policy Challenges?
Insurance Policies Don’t Cover Home Depot's Data Breach Costs, 6th Circuit Says
'Religious Discrimination'?: 4th Circuit Revives Challenge to Employer Vaccine Mandate
2 minute readStanding Spat: Split 2nd Circuit Lets Challenge to Pfizer Diversity Program Proceed
Trending Stories
- 1Am Law 200 Firms Announce Wave of D.C. Hires in White-Collar, Antitrust, Litigation Practices
- 2K&L Gates Files String of Suits Against Electronics Manufacturer's Competitors, Brightness Misrepresentations
- 3'Better of the Split': District Judge Weighs Circuit Divide in Considering Who Pays Decades-Old Medical Bill
- 4Which Georgia Courts Are Closed Today?—Here's a List
- 5After DEI Rollbacks, Employment Lawyers See Potential For Targeting Corporate Commitment to Equality
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250