Arnold & Porter Snags SCOTUS Veteran John Elwood From Vinson & Elkins
Elwood, succeeding Lisa Blatt, who jumped to Williams & Connolly, said he foresees growing Arnold & Porter's appellate practice.
June 24, 2019 at 07:31 AM
5 minute read
John Elwood, a former law clerk to Justice Anthony Kennedy and an alum of the U.S. solicitor general's office, will head Arnold & Porter's appellate and Supreme Court practice, continuing a “musical chairs” shuffle at the top echelons of the Supreme Court bar.
Known for his rare ability to make analysis of the Supreme Court fun to read, Elwood replaces Lisa Blatt, who left to head Williams & Connolly's Supreme Court and appellate practice in February. She succeeded Kannon Shanmugam, who went to Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison to launch its Supreme Court and appellate team.
Elwood has argued nine cases at the Supreme Court, five while at the solicitor general's office and four at Vinson & Elkins, where he had worked for the past 10 years. Before that, Elwood was a senior deputy in the Office of Legal Counsel at the Justice Department.
In an interview on Friday, Elwood said he decided to join Arnold & Porter in part because it is “a much bigger platform” that emphasizes litigation.
Another attraction, Elwood said, was that two of his Vinson & Elkins colleagues, Craig Margolis and Tirzah Lollar, moved to Arnold & Porter recently. They, like Elwood, specialize in False Claims Act litigation. But Elwood said the firm has “a very broad range of litigation, and they also do a ton of pro bono, so I think there will be a lot of opportunities to argue across the full range.”
Elwood said he foresees growing Arnold & Porter's appellate practice beyond its current numbers. “There's a lot of value in having an appellate practice” embedded with a trial team, he said. During Blatt's 10-year tenure at the firm, the practice won seven Supreme Court cases.
In a statement, Arnold & Porter chair Richard Alexander said, “John is a highly respected appellate and Supreme Court advocate whom clients trust to handle their most challenging and complex issues. His extensive experience, coupled with his record of leadership, makes him the ideal person to lead our top-tier appellate team.”
Apart from his Supreme Court arguments and his tweets, Elwood's visibility includes his intensely obscure “Relist Watch” feature that he writes for SCOTUSblog. He tracks when the court “relists” a pending petition for consideration at its next private conference, an action that can signal when and whether the case will be granted certiorari.
To make the feature lively, Elwood sprinkles throughout the report what he recently described as “especially funny jokes, dank memes and hilarious GIFs. In fact, they are so good that there's a danger that, if people could just read everything, unrestrained mirth would disrupt the workplace.”
That, plus a now-defunct annual review of the court's actions that he used to write for Green Bag, has earned Elwood the title of “The Dave Barry of Supreme Court humor.” In a prescient review of the 2011 term of the court, Elwood wrote, referring to Justice Clarence Thomas' concurrence in the Second Amendment case McDonald v. Chicago: “Justice Thomas seized the opportunity to advocate overruling the Slaughterhouse Cases and United States v. Cruikshank —the last two empty spaces on his 'Overrule 'em All!' punchcard. Having finally completed the set, he won a toaster.”
Elwood said on Friday the Dave Barry moniker still works. “There's a pretty small field of Supreme Court humorists. A little bit of humor makes the medicine go down better.”
Until recently, Elwood was also active at the University of Virginia School of Law Supreme Court litigation clinic. But since his wife, Courtney Elwood, became general counsel of the Central Intelligence Agency in June 2017, it has been difficult for him to travel frequently to Charlottesville.
“There is a requirement, under the ABA rules, that you can only do so many things long distance. And as long as my wife is at the CIA, it kind of impairs my ability to go down and do the lessons,” he said.
At Vinson & Elkins, Elwood displayed some of his collection of Gibson guitars and would occasionally take one down to play, to relieve stress. He said he won't likely bring his guitars to Arnold & Porter, however. “The interior walls are glass, so they may have inferior soundproofing,” he said.
But Elwood was pleased to learn that several of his new colleagues at Arnold & Porter play musical instruments. “Stanton Jones plays both guitar and mandolin, just like I do,” Elwood said, “There's a trumpeter and a cellist, too. They'll show me up as a hack, but I'm planning on getting a fake arm cast so no one ever expects me to play.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAmazon, SpaceX Press Constitutional Challenges to NLRB at 5th Circuit
Will the 9th Circuit Still be Center Stage in Trump Policy Challenges?
11th Circuit Revives Project Veritas' Defamation Lawsuit Against CNN
End of an (Chevron) Era: DC Circuit Tackles Challenge to Fishing Monitor Rule, Again
Trending Stories
- 1Judicial Ethics Opinion 24-61
- 2Decision of the Day: School District's Probe Was a 'Sham'; Title IX Administrator Showed Sex-Based Bias
- 3US Magistrate Judge Embry Kidd Confirmed to 11th Circuit
- 4Shaq Signs $11 Million Settlement to Resolve Astrals Investor Claims
- 5McCormick Consolidates Two Tesla Chancery Cases
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250