The NLJ 500: Climbing Mountains, Cracking Ceilings
The 2019 Women in Law Scorecard has a new firm at No. 1, as others push to recruit and retain women lawyers.
June 25, 2019 at 08:10 AM
8 minute read
When Frieda Garcia joined Berry Appleman & Leiden about 18 years ago, the immigration firm was much smaller and had fewer female attorneys. Over the years, as the firm quadrupled its size, it has grown into one of the top destinations for female firm leaders.
This year, the San Francisco-based firm sits atop the The National Law Journal's 2019 Women in Law Scorecard.
Garcia, a senior partner in Berry Appleman's San Francisco office, said seeing female attorneys in leadership roles is one of the biggest changes she's noticed at the firm since she joined: "More women have grown through the ranks and are now in the partnership position, more so than men."
The Women in Law Scorecard rankings are calculated by adding each firm's percentage of total lawyers who are women with the percentage of partners who are women.
How does your firm compare to peers and competitors? Get the NLJ 500 data exclusively on Legal Compass.
At Berry Appleman, which reported having 142 lawyers in 2018 in data submitted to The National Law Journal, 59.2% of them are women. And women accounted for 60% of the total partnership and 57.8% of associates at the firm.
This year, 271 of the nation's 350 largest law firms by head count answered the survey for the Women in Law Scorecard, which ranks the nation's largest law firms by representation of women attorneys. (Berry Appleman was not included in the Scorecard rankings last year because the firm was outside the top 350 of the NLJ 500 based on 2017 lawyer head count.) Among all 271 firms surveyed, women comprised 36.5% of 141,466 attorneys in 2018. But the equity partnership ranks were only 23.5% women, out of 59,000 total partners. Women comprised 47% of the 67,166 associates at all 271 firms.
|A Push for Gender Diversity
Firms best known for practices that have traditionally attracted more women lawyers—namely, immigration and labor and employment—remained leaders on the Women's Scorecard. But other firms, particularly some on the Am Law 200, are angling to climb up the list by diversifying lateral searches for partners.
"Over the last couple of years, and each year more so than the year previous, most of my clients—firms in the Am Law 100, Am Law 200—are very specific when they're conducting lateral partner searches that they want me to focus on finding the female or minority partner candidates," said Avis Caravello, who has run her legal recruiting firm for 30 years.
She added, "awareness of the number of female partners is becoming more of a focus each year for firms," and that is largely a result of client requests.
Tracking the numbers for women at law firms can contribute to meaningful improvement in representation, said Jeremy Fudge, Berry Appleman's Dallas-based managing partner, who has been leading the firm since 2013. "The great thing about competitions and competitors is, if you are approaching it correctly, then it is making you better," he said.
Berry Appleman has been deliberately growing the firm's female and diversity attorney head counts, in part to compete with peers, Fudge said. Part of that stems from changes the firm has made to internal policies to cut down on lawyer attrition more broadly, like allowing for remote work and flexible work schedules.
In addition to the changes aimed at improving diversity, Berry Appleman's primary focus as an immigration law firm helps, as the practice historically tends to attract more women attorneys.
Last year's leader, New York-based immigration boutique Fragomen held a seven-year streak atop the list—and holds the No. 2 spot this year. The firm reported that women made up 65.2% of its 582 lawyers in 2018 and that women accounted for 51% of partners. Additionally, 69.5% of associates at the firm are women.
Regardless of gender, "the immigration area is very conducive to attracting people who want to help others," said Carmita Alonso, a Fragomen partner and executive committee member. "We deal with cultural differences and ethnic differences, different groups, from different countries." After Berry Appleman and Fragomen, four of the next five firms on the Women in Law Scorecard focus on labor and employment law: Kubicki Draper at No. 3; FordHarrison at No. 5; Constangy, Brooks, Smith & Prophete at No. 6; and Littler Mendelson at No. 7.
|Progress in Big Law
The majority of the top 30 firms on this year's scorecard have a head count of fewer than 300. Exceptions include San Francisco-based Littler Mendelson (No. 7); Greenville, South Carolina-based Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart (No.14); New York-based Jackson Lewis (No.17); and Los Angeles-based Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith (No. 25)—all of which have a strong emphasis on labor and employment. These firms also appeared in the top 30 on last year's list.
In 2018, a number of other large firms boosted their stats on the Women in Law Scorecard. Those that moved up in the ranks place women in leadership roles and foster a pipeline of female and diverse attorneys.
O'Melveny & Myers landed at 68th on the Women in Law Scorecard this year—up from 104th the previous year. In 2018, women made up 40.3% of O'Melveny's 673 lawyers. Women accounted for 21% of equity partners and 45.5% of associates. From 2017 to 2018, the firm's total female partner head count increased by six.
"Our pipeline of women from counsel to partners has been incredibly strong in the last five years. At least 40% of our partner promotees have been women," said Mary Ellen Connerty, O'Melveny's director of diversity and engagement. "It really speaks to [us having] our eye on these women from a very early stage, up through the years that we bring them to the partnership."
Ropes & Gray, which elected a woman partner as chair for the first time in its more than 150-year history, has moved up to 32nd place on this year's NLJ scorecard, from 36th last year. Julie Jones is set to take over that role when current chair, R. Bradford Malt, retires at the end of 2019.
In 2018, women made up 43.1% of Ropes & Gray's 1,210 lawyers, as well as 26.1% of the equity partners and 45.7% of associates at the firm.
Amanda Morrison, a private equity partner who co-chairs the firm's Women's Forum, said that women attorneys are drawn to Ropes & Gray because they have seen other female leaders succeeding in a variety of practices, and not pigeonholed.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'So Many Firms' Have Yet to Announce Associate Bonuses, Underlining Big Law's Uneven Approach
5 minute readAs Profits Rise, Law Firms Likely to Make More AI Investments in 2025
'Serious Disruptions'?: Federal Courts Brace for Government Shutdown Threat
3 minute readPre-Internet High Court Ruling Hobbling Efforts to Keep Tech Giants from Using Below-Cost Pricing to Bury Rivals
6 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250