Who Is Trevor McFadden? Meet the Judge Assigned the Trump Tax Returns Case
The former Baker McKenzie white-collar partner earlier served on Trump's transition team, vetting potential cabinet picks. "I do not know the President and have never met him in any capacity," McFadden said last year in a case where he was asked to recuse.
July 03, 2019 at 12:59 PM
7 minute read
A federal trial judge in Washington and former Big Law partner who served as an unpaid volunteer on President Donald Trump's presidential transition team will oversee the U.S. House lawsuit that seeks to force the Treasury Department and IRS to disclose several years of the president's tax returns.
The judge, Trevor McFadden, who joined the bench from the Justice Department in 2017, was randomly assigned the case Wednesday. The House filed suit this week, arguing the Trump administration is violating federal law by refusing to turn over Trump's tax returns to the House Ways and Means Committee.
Federal law commands that U.S. tax officials “shall” disclose any private citizen's returns on the request of the committee. Justice Department and Treasury officials contend, in their refusal to comply with a congressional subpoena, that lawmakers are acting outside the scope of their authority.
A dispute about whether McFadden should recuse in an unrelated subpoena case that came before him in 2017 raised questions about his ties to the Trump campaign, which he called “attenuated” and said would not affect his impartiality. He rejected the suggestion in that case, which involved the research firm Fusion GPS, to step down.
“I will evaluate any other real or potential conflict, or relationship that could give rise to an appearance of conflict, on a case-by-case basis and determine appropriate action, with the advice of parties and their counsel, including recusal where necessary,” McFadden said at the time of his nomination to the trial court.
Who is McFadden? Here's a brief snapshot of his career in the law.
>> McFadden is a former Baker McKenzie white-collar partner in Washington who joined the Justice Department in January 2017. He was a leading supervisory attorney in the criminal division at Main Justice, serving there until his appointment by Trump to the Washington federal trial court. At Main Justice, McFadden “was by far the most prolific U.S. government speaker on the anti-corruption circuit in early 2017,” according to a report by the law firm Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher. (McFadden was a summer associate at Gibson Dunn in 2005 and 2006.) McFadden, in various speeches, said prosecutors were committed to “vigorously” enforcing the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act. McFadden was a partner at Baker McKenzie from 2015 to 2017, and he was an associate from 2013 to 2015. McFadden estimated that about 20% of his work at Baker & McKenzie was in litigation. McFadden was an assistant U.S. attorney in Washington from 2009 to 2013. He clerked for Judge Steve Colloton of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit in 2006. In 2008, McFadden served as counsel to then-Deputy Attorney General Mark Filip, who now leads the government enforcement defense and international investigations team at Kirkland & Ellis.
>> McFadden's ties to the Trump presidential campaign were in focus in a subpoena fight that landed in front of McFadden. Lawyers for the research firm Fusion GPS, involved in the production of the so-called “Russia dossier,” were fighting efforts by a Russian businessman to get information from the company. Fusion's attorneys said McFadden should have stepped aside in the dispute. “The lawyers wrote that McFadden's impartiality could be questioned because of his work for President Donald Trump's transition team, his time as second in command at DOJ's Criminal Division and his representation of clients in private practice at Baker & McKenzie,” the National Law Journal reported last year.
McFadden declined the invitation. He called his service on Trump's team “sporadic and unpaid volunteer activity” that “did not make President Trump my employer.” McFadden said: “As a volunteer, I reviewed public-source information about potential cabinet appointees for approximately four hours every few weeks for two to three months.” He continued: “I did not come into contact with Mr. Trump or any of the senior members of his campaign team. In fact, I do not know the President and have never met him in any capacity.” He called his connection to Trump “attenuated.”
McFadden said at one point in the Fusion GPS subpoena case: “Whatever the President's political interests may be, Fusion has not shown that his personal fortune and personal freedom are jeopardized by the discovery dispute in the underlying case. Every president has a wide range of political interests, and President Trump has commented on a plethora of people, companies and cases. It cannot be that the president has a cognizable interest in every matter that has the potential to indirectly vindicate his public comments.”
>> McFadden recently said the U.S. House doesn't have legal “standing” to challenge how Trump is paying for the administration's border wall. “Few ideas are more central to the American political tradition than the doctrine of separation of powers,” McFadden wrote in the opening lines of his ruling. “Our Founders emerged from the Revolution determined to establish a government incapable of repeating the tyranny from which the Thirteen Colonies escaped. They did so by splitting power across three branches of the federal government and by providing each the tools required to preserve control over its functions.” The judge continued later: “While the Constitution bestows upon members of the House many powers, it does not grant them standing to hale the executive branch into court claiming a dilution of Congress's legislative authority. The court therefore lacks jurisdiction to hear the House's claims and will deny its motion.” Lawyers for the House are challenging McFadden's ruling on appeal.
>> McFadden got a call from the White House—about his candidacy for the trial bench—shortly after arriving at the Justice Department. “On March 2, 2017, I was contacted by the White House Counsel's Office and informed that I was one of the candidates being considered to fill a judicial vacancy on the United States District Court of the District of Columbia. Since that time, I have been in contact with officials from the White House Counsel's Office and the Office of Legal Policy at the Department of Justice,” McFadden said in a questionnaire submitted to the Senate Judiciary Committee. McFadden said in 2017 that he had been a member of the Federalist Society since 2003. He also served as co-chair of the Washington chapter of the University of Virginia Federalist Society Alumni. McFadden graduated from the University of Virginia School of Law in 2006. “I joined the Federalist Society as a law student because the group sponsored debates on important legal issues and I was interested in going on the group's annual trip to the Supreme Court,” McFadden told senators at the time of his nomination. He was asked whether he “agreed” with the views of the Federalist Society. His response: “I have not studied the views espoused by the Federalist Society. In any event, it would be improper for me to state a personal belief about matters that may come before me. If confirmed as a judge, I pledge to apply binding precedent to the facts before me.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All6th Circuit Judge Readler Cautions Against Shaming Lawyers Over Election Challenges
3 Lawyers Mount Defense Against Ethics Charges Over 2020 Election Fraud Lawsuits
Paladin Launches Pro Bono Election Protection Portal for Attorneys
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Dechert partners Andrew J. Levander, Angela M. Liu and Neil A. Steiner have stepped in to defend Arbor Realty Trust and certain executives in a pending securities class action. The complaint, filed July 31 in New York Eastern District Court by Levi & Korsinsky, contends that the defendants concealed a 'toxic' mobile home portfolio, vastly overstated collateral in regards to the company's loans and failed to disclose an investigation of the company by the FBI. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Pamela K. Chen, is 1:24-cv-05347, Martin v. Arbor Realty Trust, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Arthur G. Jakoby, Ryan Feeney and Maxim M.L. Nowak from Herrick Feinstein have stepped in to defend Charles Dilluvio and Seacor Capital in a pending securities lawsuit. The complaint, filed Sept. 30 in New York Southern District Court by the Securities and Exchange Commission, accuses the defendants of using consulting agreements, attorney opinion letters and other mechanisms to skirt regulations limiting stock sales by affiliate companies and allowing the defendants to unlawfully profit from sales of Enzolytics stock. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Andrew L. Carter Jr., is 1:24-cv-07362, Securities and Exchange Commission v. Zhabilov et al.
Who Got The Work
Clark Hill members Vincent Roskovensky and Kevin B. Watson have entered appearances for Architectural Steel and Associated Products in a pending environmental lawsuit. The complaint, filed Aug. 27 in Pennsylvania Eastern District Court by Brodsky & Smith on behalf of Hung Trinh, accuses the defendant of discharging polluted stormwater from its steel facility without a permit in violation of the Clean Water Act. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Gerald J. Pappert, is 2:24-cv-04490, Trinh v. Architectural Steel And Associated Products, Inc.
Who Got The Work
Michael R. Yellin of Cole Schotz has entered an appearance for S2 d/b/a the Shoe Surgeon, Dominic Chambrone a/k/a Dominic Ciambrone and other defendants in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The case, filed July 15 in New York Southern District Court by DLA Piper on behalf of Nike, seeks to enjoin Ciambrone and the other defendants in their attempts to build an 'entire multifaceted' retail empire through their unauthorized use of Nike’s trademark rights. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald, is 1:24-cv-05307, Nike Inc. v. S2, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Sullivan & Cromwell partner Adam S. Paris has entered an appearance for Orthofix Medical in a pending securities class action arising from a proposed acquisition of SeaSpine by Orthofix. The suit, filed Sept. 6 in California Southern District Court, by Girard Sharp and the Hall Firm, contends that the offering materials and related oral communications contained untrue statements of material fact. According to the complaint, the defendants made a series of misrepresentations about Orthofix’s disclosure controls and internal controls over financial reporting and ethical compliance. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Linda Lopez, is 3:24-cv-01593, O'Hara v. Orthofix Medical Inc. et al.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250